"People are always searching for ways to better themselves. It is said that those who read fiction tend to be more understanding, empathizing, and open minded. Humans are naturally flawed but reading seems to improve people. One natural, unavoidable characteristic of humans is judgment. People have an initial instinct to judge those whom they have just met. While it is true that judgment impairs one’s perspective when it comes to others, generalizations are the true barriers that do not allow people to get to know one another. The topic of judgment is greatly exemplified in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein as it becomes apparent that characters tend to generalize beautiful people, like Elizabeth, and ugly people, like Victor’s creature. The first …show more content…
King Arthur judges the young knight, the protagonist, in court for the rape of a young maiden. This act exposes the ugly arrogance that the knight possesses and exposes King Arthur’s form of justice. King Arthur sentences the knight to death; however, Queen Guinevere proposes an endeavor that saves the knight’s life. King Arthur groups the knight with all other criminals and sees no worth in him while the wise Queen Guinevere does not judge so quickly and harshly. Chaucer also portrays the knight as judgmental and narrow-minded when encountering the old woman, his wife. The knight is angry and disgusted with his new wife whom he only sees as " ugly, elderly, and poor” (Chaucer. 1063). The knight has practically barred himself from being happy with her because of his close-minded, unchanged generalization and the wife is upset because of her judgmental, single-minded …show more content…
However, to avoid judgment altogether is impossible for man. No matter what, humans will always have an initial judgment of someone or something. What truly determines our character is how we react to our initial judgment. When people generalize others as ugly, poor, or monstrous, people are only separating themselves from others as if to mentally and physically block them from their lives and to make themselves feel superior. Having a primary judgment is natural, but preventing oneself from experiencing human interaction because of some broad title is uncalled for and rude. Those who read fiction and mentally observe this socially constructed isolation tend to be more understanding, empathizing, and open minded. By using literature and even historical events to open one’s mind, one can surpass this subconscious animalistic judgment and break these metaphorical barriers of social
Against Judgement It is human nature to judge--maybe even criticize--everyone we meet. We all do it. The only matter is how we go about it. Are we going to give-in to stereotypes and peoples’ appearances, or are we going to judge a person only by who they really are? In the enthralling novel To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee uses foreshadowing, symbolism, and allegory to convey that some things--some people--are more than meets the eye, a message that is still relevant in today’s society.
The actions of an individual defines the boundary between sympathy and wickedness. Their behaviors and thoughts change the plot of the story and character identity. Mary Shelley uses moral ambiguity to overlook the unrealistic nature of her story. In Frankenstein, this concept incorporates itself into Mary Shelley’s characters. Ambiguity invokes an attachment between the figures and readers.
It is pretty obvious that the knight doesnt want to marry the old lady. He offers everything else he has but begs her to let him be free. ¨Old lady, by the Lord I know indeed that such was my behest, but for Gods lovethink of a new request, take all my goods, but leave my body free¨. (232-235) After this she agrees that she is not all that pretty, has no money, and is foul. But despite all this she wont agree to change her mind, she in the end forces the knight to wed her and all his arguments are futile.¨ If I agree!
The Knight from the Wife of Bath’s tale was weak and powerless, which is not what one would expect from a knight. In The Canterbury Tales, Chaucer not only has The Knight from the Wife of Bath’s tale, but he also includes another Knight in the prologue. The Knight in the prologue was described as being “a most distinguished man”; He was characterized as “truth[ful], honor[able], generous, and courte[ous]”(46). The Knight from The Wife of Bath’s Tale was the complete opposite;he was weak, powerless and did not uphold integrity. The Knight from the Wife of Bath was so powerless that he went out into the world looking for power, and in order to make himself appear and feel powerful he with his “lusty liver” raped an innocent young girl.
In a world filled with judgement and criticism, people struggle with this on the daily. Always having an opinion about every little thing. Whether people choose to share or not that is their own perspective and everyone’s is different. A person can never have judgement for a person, until they can physically feel and see what they go through each and every day. In Harper Lee’s
Mary shelly demonstrates that human injustice is caused by fear of what is different, through the novel Frankenstein. This injustice takes the form of unfair treatment. Frankenstein demonstrates how unfair treatment of others is caused by fear of their differences. This is shown by Frankenstein’s abandonment of his creation. Frankenstein abandons his creation because of his fear of its inhumane appearance.
After childhood, people come to realise that the world is a cruel place. People misjudge others; thus, over time, people grow to accept the amount of brutality in the world. Parents often tell their children that first impressions count, mainly because others are quick to judge. In To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, and The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-time Indian by Sherman Alexie, first impressions of people are never correct, as we judge people after mere seconds, and we are often incorrect in our assumptions of people.
Duality is shown in Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, a gothic tale of a scientist whom looks to advance the life-giving qualities of mother nature. Through this novel, Shelley proves that good and evil in human nature is not always simple to define, and that everyone has both of these qualities within them. The duality of human nature is shown through the characters of Victor Frankenstein and his monster, who are both heroes in the novel while simultaneously displaying anti-hero qualities. Shelley forces the reader to sympathize with them both but also creates gruesome ideas of the two. Frankenstein’s creature places himself in a submissive position when he begs his creator to have mercy on him and asking the creator to “create a female for [him] with whom [he] can live in the interchange of those sympathies necessary for [his] being.”
She just could not choose which one to love not knowing her destin is to be with a charming knight. A knight is kinda mischevious in a way. No one truly knows what he does everyday . Though it is thought that he follows the code of chivalry . He tells the truth which is hard to find a honest man, This knight was also very honorable .
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein follows the story of a scientist and his experiment gone wrong. Victor Frankenstein, the scientist, abandons his creature at the first sight of it coming to life. The monster, left alone and afraid, transforms from a warm, loving character to one that seeks revenge as the toils of nature and reality begin to take control. Their title changes of “master” and “subordinate” are often referenced in Frankenstein, and plays off the feelings of vengeance they have for each other. Shelley has built the novel around this relationship in a way that captures not only the audience’s attention but also the character’s feelings of regret and hatred as the consequences of exceeding these moral boundaries come to haunt them in the decisions they make and influence the people around them.
Student: Omnia Saad Kamel (Code: 351) Emotions as a Feature of Romanticism in Marry Shelly's Frankenstein The overflow of emotions in Marry Shelly's Frankenstein defines it as a Romantic work. Emotions unify the characters at various points in the story, portray their individual personalities, and contrast them against each other. The influence of nature on the thread of emotions and how the inner feelings of main characters are interpreted by others emphasizes the importance of emotions to the Romantics.
They develop in us bad habits. They mislead and misguide. Bad books ruin our intellect (Mehta).” However, before taking this into account, one must ask himself what a “good book” is. For example, two of Miller’s most famous works portray that image of tragedy to a tee.
The Knight’s tale is looked upon by some critics as a shining example of Chivalry which embraces the traits of knightly virtues, honor and courtly love. Admittedly, the duel they fought to contend for their mutual lover, to some extent, reflected the valor and determination of a knight, but the hatred towards one another spawned by this deformed love illustrates Chivalry at an immense discount. Should fraternal love be excluded from Chivalry? After all, they had a close brotherly bond which was so easily demolished by the sense of competition and the craving to monopolize a flower girl. Fair play is irreproachable and typical of knights in the medieval time, but violence against brothers is far from the essential morals of Chivalry.
While the knight described in “The General Prologue” demonstrates honorable characteristics of chivalry, such as “generousness and courtesy,” the knight in the “Wife of Bath’s Tale” is considerably less of a gentleman (GP 46). In “The Wife of Bath’s Tale,” the knight is othered several times by different people; he is alienated
After both falling in love with her, they began to bicker over who should court her. This woman wasn’t just any wench off the street, she was honorable and virginal, a fair lady that any knight could hope to wed. This correlates back to the description of the knight. After describing a man who was chivalrous and wise, it would only make sense that the prize in his story would be to fight for the hand of a fair lady. Once again, Chaucer uses the characteristics of a knight to relate back to the narrator and also progress the story.