In the world there have been different kinds of leaders, both good and bad. One such is Peggy from the story King Peggy by Peggielene Bartels and Eleanor Herman. Peggy was a woman from Otuam Ghana, who worked at the embassy in Washington D.C. She was called one day to become the king of her village Otuam. Joseph Stalin was another example of a leader with a strong following. Stalin was the dictator of the Soviet Union. According to Wikipedia Stalin ruled from the 1920s – 1950s. He made Russia into a communist country. Although they both wanted to address corruption in their communities, Peggy and Stalin ruled very differently because of the way they treated their people, and how they made decisions for them.
One of the ways that Peggy and
…show more content…
For example, Peggy decided to let her people choose a religion for themselves. Also, people in Otuam were allowed to hold religious ceremonial events for past ancestors. Peggy embraced her ancestor's religion, and she also prayed to them when she needed help. In contrast, Stalin banned religion for every person. He also promoted atheism through schools, and he even killed people that tried to promote any religion. Stalin as well demolished churches all around Russia. Those decisions made Peggy and Stalin different from each other. It also showed that Peggy was thoughtful, and cared about what she did. Stalin made decisions to control people, instill fear, and to get power.
In conclusion, Peggy and Stalin ruled very differently due to the treatment of their people, and their decision making. Also, one of the reasons Peggy was a good person was because she wanted to help her village. Stalin was not a good person since he didn’t care what anyone thought. Peggy and Stalin each made their own minds on how they wanted to rule. That’s what separates the good people from the bad. So in all whether someone ruled a village or a country. If that person is good or bad, that would determine how that place would end up, and how its citizens would be
The denial of human rights in Ukraine and Cambodia has had huge impacts on regional and international communities. Ukraine was very independent, and Stalin wanted to remove the threat that the Ukrainians were becoming. In Cambodia, Pol Pot attempted to create a utopian Communist agrarian society. When Stalin came into power after Lenin’s death in 1924, the government was struggling to control and unwieldy empire.
A group named the Tories have been watching Mrs. Hart for awhile. Her daughter once spotted a spy looking through a hole in the wall. Nancy was making soap at the time when her daughter found the spy. She then threw a ladle of boiling soap. Through the hole, the spy was hit with the hot soap.
Heda felt a certain way due to her religious and political standing in the Czech society and reacted due to what was done to her. Her involvements tend to differ from proof found in McDermott’s article. There are many similarities that strengthen Heda depiction of popular opinion under Communist dictatorship. When Rudolf, her husband, was arrested, he was forced to admit things that he did not do. Heda analyzed that he must have been drugged because she could tell by the tone and attitude of his voice.
She was able to inspire her readers to sympathize with the Communist Cause by making the Russian characters and their ideas so likable and attractive, especially after the Great War and the Civil War caused so much pain and suffering. Russia offered peace and stability through its’ ideals, whereas America proved to only want money by any means necessary - up to and including murder. Shaginian made Mess-Mend into propaganda in order to gather support for communism. Contradictorily, does she also not imply that something must be wrong with communism if so many people are trying to stop
Main characters of films and short stories are evolving tremendously, from their actions to their character traits. In the thriller short story “All the Kings Horses” by Kurt Vonnegut, the main character portrays himself as an excellent and intelligent individual. Reason being in the short story Kelly was placed in a really bad situation. However because of specific reasons; his actions, determination, and sacrifices he was able to get the result he wanted while being under so much pressure. Colonel Bryan Kelly, father of two and husband to one, had to play a life or death game of chess.
Cutting Queen Margaret seems to not be appropriate because her main role is condemning Richard and emphasizing how Richard III continues to be the villain through out the play. There are many instances through out the play that Richard deems himself the villainous character. The audience does not seem to need any more affirmation of how manipulative Richard is. In Act I Scene I, Richard and Elizabeth began arguing because Richard accused Elizabeth and her Kinsmen of hoping that Edward will die soon. As they are arguing Queen Margaret walks into the scene where Richard and Elizabeth arguing and, out of bitterness, she decides to express her discontent.
During the novel, Anthem by Ayn Rand, the author includes many examples of communism which can relate to communist Russia. “It was not that the learning was to hard for us. It was that the learning was too easy. It is a great sin, to be born with a head which is too quick. It is not good to be different from our brothers, but it is evil to be superior to them.”
In a repressive regime, many people cannot conclude whether it was the fault of the people or the fault of the ruler. Without taking the people into consideration, new rulers come into the government, knowing how they want things to go, regardless of how the people feel. Stalin used his power, and fear to be sure that they were going to do what he wanted. Although while Stalin was getting power, the people were not aware of what was going on. The people were at fault because they sat back and watched the events unfold.
She was a prostitute held in slavery by a drug dealing brother of the Russian President that she follows, obeys, and offers herself to Agent 47 even though he remains distant to her. Agent 47 is in Russia on a job to assassinate Belicoff, the President of Russia. Towards the end of the
Not only is she dying, but her death is abnormal to observers because she aged developing wrinkles and gained weight. After his mother’s death, John was not able to control his emotions and erupted at the citizens of World State who do not understand his troubles. Huxley also uses pathos by siding with Lenina when she tries to seduce John and he gets furious and berates her by calling her a “strumpet.” Lenina does not understand why she was the perpetrator because her values are different from John’s. Lenina’s and John’s contrasting practices and emotions represent immoral and moral beliefs.
Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro were dictators famous for their communist ideology and violent reigns while totalitarian dictators. Defined by Dictionary.com, Totalitarianism is “absolute control by the state or a governing branch of a highly centralized institution” and a dictator is “a person exercising absolute power, especially a ruler who has absolute, unrestricted control in a government without hereditary succession.” Dictators are usually stern, but passionate in front of the public. Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro both came to rise in environments that were challenging politically, economically, socially or all of the above. They offered another light that people were desperate to see.
Joseph Stalin was and still is universally known for his harsh leadership in the Soviet Union. To examine the extent of his cruelness, World Civilization II: The Rise and Fall of Empires© 1500-present stated, "Stalin was not a communist; he was a sociopath. He enjoyed hurting people and ordering their deaths. In his time as dictator of the Soviet Union, he was responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of his people, and the cruel torture and imprisonment of millions more" (Sattler, 71).
While Lenina has learned portions about John's culture, she still doesn’t fully understand John's convictions, and out of marriage John would not do such a thing. Her ignorance of John's culture is there to show how her lack of knowledge influences how she perceives her own morals compared to John's morals. She couldn't possibly fully understand John's ethics, because they are directly adverse to each other, and Lenina's conditioning was too strong to overcome. Huxley effectively uses Lenina's contradictions in the end to continue the idea that ignorance can alter
The King’s first wife was Catherine of Aragon. Catherine was originally from Spain and her parents were the King and Queen of Spain Ferdinand and Isabella. Catherine was born in 1485 (she was older than Henry by 6 years). Henry was not Catherine’s first husband. Henry’s older brother Arthur was Catherine’s first husband and was the original King of England but sadly died.
Sex is casual and expected. She believes “everyone belongs to everyone else” (BNW, 34). However, Lenina has a long sexual relationship with Henry Foster which makes her unusual. Eventually she moves on to a new relationship with Bernard Marx. “But, Bernard, you 're saying the most awful things. '