“America Needs its Nerds” Analysis Leonid Fridman’s use of irony, the rhetorical triangle, and rhetorical questions in his article “America Needs its Nerds” develops his argument that American society should be more accepting of intellectuals. His tone is critical of society’s values, which is seen through his use of phrases such as, “there is something very wrong with the system of values,” (1). Through his reference to Harvard University, a “prestigious academic institution” (11), he demonstrates that society tends to look down upon intellectuals by revealing that many students are “ashamed to admit” (13) the amount of time they spend on their studies. The fact that even at Harvard, a school known for its focus on intellectualism, students still perpetuate the anti-intellectualism stereotype shows the extent of the problem with the values of America’s current society.
In the article “America Needs its Nerds” by Leonid Friedman; Fridman argues that “intellectually curious and academic serious people” are not as respected as they should be. Instead of the more intellectual people being praised for their intelligence, they are ignored by society. Fridman builds this argument by using logic and facts, creative word choice, and comparisons. Leonid Fridman uses interesting facts to develop his argument "nerds ".in the American society.
In the article "America Needs It 's Nerd" Lenid Fridman begins to build his arguement that America needs its nerds by first pointing out how much American 's discriminate the intellectually curious. Fridman first points out the derogitory nature of the word "nerd" which is defined as a freak that bites of the heads off of live chickens. Moreover, Fridman point out the discrimination of the intellectually curious at Prestigious school like Harvard, where he says "anti-intellectualism is rampant...nerds are ostracized while athletes are idolized." He then begins Amerias anti-intellectualism to the rest of the world that values education, Stating "in East Asia, a kid who studies hard is lauded and held up as an example to other students."
The author of this essay, Marty Nemko, has worked in both career and educational counseling, as well as writing as a columnist. His has firsthand experience with not only university presidents, but also a wide range of the students. Knowing he’s worked with the area he is writing about, may led some credibility to his ethos. However, he may have a personal stake in writing this piece because he has written several books concerning educational psychology and its related issues. He even directly says in this essay “…data I used for my book, How to Get an Ivy League Education at a State University.”
In the weighty argumentative essay, “America Needs Its Nerds”, by Leonid Fridman, he points out a very important issue students who are academically gifted face: their intellectual advances often have them labeled as degrading terms such as geek or nerd. Throughout Fridman’s argument, he structures his agreement to attend to the appeal to logos and his belief that we do, in fact need our “nerds.” Fidman first exemplifies his assertive tone in the mere first few words of the text saying, “There is something very wrong with the system of values in a society that has only derogatory terms like nerd and geek for the intellectually curious and academically curious.” His anger towards the American system of values becomes evident early on, thus
In poetry and other literary and rhetoric works, parallelism is a term that refers to a literary or rhetorical device that makes components or parts of a sentence have the same constructions or look grammatically similar. In other words, parallelism entails using repeated words, phrasal forms or successive verbal constructions that parallel in their meter or grammatical structure to create a particular pattern to prose or a literature passage. Authors and poets establish parallelism by using devices such as antithesis, anaphora, and asyndeton, among other literary devices in different possibilities of juxtaposed contrast and repetition. In “The Declaration of Independence” there are several examples of parallelism, and the one I select for
Logos is the most useful device for influencing an audience to agree with a claim. Although ethos and pathos contribute to a persuasive argument, logos are the most important. logos, and logical and scientific reasoning are two of the few ways to limit the amount of counter arguments. Logos is the only form of persuasion that moves the audience on the basis of truth. It is the most relatable method of communication to an audience and offers specific facts and examples.
Mark Antony Over Marcus Brutus One can see as they read through Mark Antony’s and Marcus Brutus’ speeches, that they left a major effect on the crowd at Julius Caesar’s funeral. The varied reactions out of the crowd were based on the rhetoric these two characters illustrate. They both exercised parts of ethos, pathos, and logos. Mark Antony’s speech at Caesar’s funeral had more effect on the people of Rome.
The creator of this examination is Nicholas A. Bowman. He moved on from the University of Michigan with PhD in brain research and instruction and two graduate degree in training. His examination intrigues incorporate the results an of and mental procedures connected with school assorted qualities encounters, the estimation of undergrad advancement, and the effect of school rankings on different constitutions. American schools and colleges have seen more noteworthy differing qualities among their college understudies and awesome urban intrigue and activity among these understudies. Differences encounters are connected with expansions in urban attitudes,behavioral intentions,and practices.