Do you think it’s ethical to use your religion as a way to dominate and control others or instead use it to unshackle and help the oppressed? The latter describes liberation theology and the primary describes how mainstream Christianity used their religion. In this essay I’m going to explain how Jesus as liberator and Kairos time shows that liberation theology and mainstream Christianity are on the opposite ends of the theological spectrum. Liberation theology believes in equality and socialism and mainstream Christianity believes in domination and capitalism. I am also going to bring up how the new method shows how liberation theology is a better alternative to mainstream Christianity, as it shows how by following liberation theology mindsets on many …show more content…
So anything they do they do have to reflect what Jesus preached and did like choosing to live his life like the poor to emphasize how unhealthy and selfish it is to live like a king when there are so many people that don’t have anything. On the other hand, mainstream Christianity uses their religion as a way to make them feel more superior than everyone else that doesn’t believe in exactly what they believe in. They use this belief of superiority to justify the domination of others like Christopher Columbus did to the Native Americans when he came to their land. He thought they were savages just because they were different than him and didn’t believe in the same God as him. Mainstream Christianity supports this idea that they are the only ones that deserve privilege. “The people to fear the most are those who claim that they know exactly what they-and-we must do” (Brown, 58). This quote shows that therefore mainstream Christianity is something to fear and not support because this way of thinking will only lead us to wars, death, and division, which was seen in the Thirty Years’ War and the Spanish Inquisition, and the genocide of Native
“In a word, fear, the mainstream fears christians opprobrium and ridicule” (LaVey 10). LaVey’s point has proven that other religions mainly Christians are very against Lavey's ideas. LaVey introduced everyone to his religion not only to his deciles but to everyone who is finding ones self. LaVey is trying to open people's minds in finding one's own religion. Although He’ll struggle Lavey will find ways to have it his way.
When different political views and spiritual beliefs are put together, the consequences behind that mixture are often dire and it ultimately results to violence. He emphasizes the importance of learning the past as well as the most up-to-date events of these particular religions. Kimball does his best to explain why those types of problems tend to occur, but he also gives us insight as to how these problems can be corrected, which could lead to a better hope for the future. All it takes is people of good faith as well people of goodwill to come together to speak aloud against the fundamentalists.
4 They crush people with unbearable religious demands and never lift a finger to ease the burden.” (Matthew 23:2-4). The Pharisees had prayed loudly, used church money, and never followed their own rule just like a hypocrite. Jesus never was rich, he followed the poorest of the poor, and gave everything he had to the poor. “Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children.
Dr. King’s way of speech in “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” starts off with, “My Dear fellow Clergymen,” which seems oddly reserved. He had learned that Birmingham clergymen had issued a declaration critiquing him and flattering the city’s narrow-minded police influence, when Dr. King had been in solitary quarantine. Due to this, anyone could agree that Dr. King had every right to write an enraged letter. However, his topic was not to go off on this matter, but to explain himself. Thus, Dr. King starts his letter with “fellow clergymen,” which depicts the main idea of his argument, which is “brotherhood.”
Perhaps, the most frightening aspect of this book is the ever-darkening depravity of American culture. Honestly, if a reader traces the opponents of fundamentalism through the work, they find a disturbing trend that explains why America is facing the problems she’s facing today. Slowly but surely, those who hold to fundamentalism are becoming fewer in number. Now, most well-educated people would not know what fundamentalism is or (more importantly) what it stands for. Small wonder America is going to Hell in a handbasket (pardon my
In the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, written by himself, the author asserts that the Christianity of the slaveholders is hypocritical and used to justify their actions. Douglass supports his claim by, first, talking about the affairs that the white men had with female slaves. The wife’s knew about it but, did not think any of it since slaves were considered property. Also second, Douglass’s purpose is to point out the hypocrisy of slave owners who profess to be Christian in order to treat the slaves as not as people. Based on Douglass detailed writing is for people in power make a change in slavery.
He uses religious metaphors to emphasize that Americans need to resist the vast and well-equipped oppressors such as the time when Moses parted the Red Sea and the people were left with no choice but to either cross the parted sea and close upon their “pursuers, or a life and death struggle will ensue between oppressors and oppressed - between those who would destroy and enslave and those who are seeking to enter into the inheritance prepared for them by a beneficent Father” (795). Weaver emphasises that currently in society, men have been reduced to slaves who are victims of corporate feudal powers and unless the common people do not acknowledge this slave relationship to the corporations, then more chaos will ensue. We, as human beings of God, should know through our history and past experience to steer clear of this danger by resisting the vast and well-equipped oppressors. This religious metaphor takes inspiration from Providentialism with the idea that Americans are living in a biblical epic and hence must act as moral agents for the sake of furthering God’s plan. Therefore, this biblical language and tone are familiar to Americans, therefore, easier for Americans to digest.
Evangelical preachers, in keeping with their social doctrine that targeted the disadvantaged in society, attempted to convert slaves and Native Americans. Prior to the Awakening no one had made a serious effort at their conversion for fear that Christianity was “a step towards freedom” (357). Slaves attended evangelical sermons en masse, wary of the Anglican ministers who supported their masters. Evangelical Christianity offered moments of release and equality from the perpetual suffering of a slave’s life. This did not mean, however, that the evangelists actively opposed slavery.
Niyazi Nabiyev Reading and Writing IV Compare Contrast Essay – Final Draft 20.05.2014 Totally freedom can be described as: “The right, given to people by God, to create their own choices.” You freedom cannot be damaged by any power other than God. Humans can always work out their freedom when selection.
“Religion itself dominates less a revealed doctrine than a commonly held opinion. I do, therefore, realize that, among Americans, political laws are such that the majority exercises sovereign power over society” (Page 501, Chapter 2, Democracy in America, Tocqueville). In this quote Tocqueville explains how Americans try to find answers to their everyday lives and challenges they encounter in religion. They need something to rely on when everything in their lives turns out wrong, and religion is usually their
In a small classroom at Liberty University, students enrolled in an upper level psychology course have discussed the various models of the integration of psychology and Christianity as proposed by David N. Entwistle (2015). The models that were discussed include Enemies, Foreign Spies, Domestic Spies, Colonialists, Rebuilders, Neutral Parties, and Allies. One specific part of the curriculum for the class includes the input of each student on which of these seven models seem to be the strongest. From the perspective of one student in particular, this paper considers and makes arguments supporting why the Allies model provides the best explanation for the integration of psychology and Christianity. In this paper the case for why the Allies model
Douglass’s words that captured such “veracity” is his saying that “slaveholder’s profession of Christianity is a palpable imposture” (xiv). The strong declaration, which gained many witnesses, proves his first-hand experience with slavery and therefore, justifies his credibility, regarding his religious persecution. Through this, he proves that Christianity, as they call it, is an illicit form of religion bent toward justifying white slaveowners’ actions while praying for “heavenly union” (Douglass 106). In the following occurrences, Douglass provides insight into the religious masking that Christian slaveholders use to cover-up the unjust treatment of their slaves, shining light onto the misinterpreted cult they have formed to justify their crimes and the effect religion has upon the white dominant culture
Religion and its relationship to slavery is a contradictive subject, whether it was forced upon slaves or was a form of hope and freedom is still commonly debated about to this day. However, these individuals were devoted Christians in the abolitionist movement who all
Christianity, often linked with innate goodness and charity, defends men who continue to rape, abuse, and commit other sins. This reveals the paradox of the situation. As man becomes more and more reliant on this manpower for their luxuries, they turn to methods such as praying for salvation. “The religion of the south is a mere covering for the most covering crimes...strongest protection” (67) expresses the power of religion as a driving force of evil instead of good. The 19th century plantation owner prays to prove his devotion, which excuses him for his irreligious
Christianity was, to the slaves of America, (something with a double meaning). In the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass an American Slave, Frederick Douglass, the author, argues about how Christianity can mean one thing to a free white man and something completely different to a black slave. The slave owners follow the ‘Christianity of the Land’ while the slaves follow the ‘Christianity of Christ.’ Frederick begins to build his credibility to a, white, northern, audience by including documents from trustworthy writers and by getting into personal experiences through his writing. Throughout the narrative, he is articulate in how he writes, and it shows the reader that he is well educated.