Lindberg Baby Case Summary

On May 12, 1932, a shocking discovery was made, Charles A. Lindbergh Jr. was found dead in a wooded area a couple miles from the Lindbergh estate in Hopewell. Charles Lindbergh and Betty Gow both confirmed the child’s identification and by his clothing worn at the

The Strange Kidnapping of the Lindbergh Baby Famous pilot Charles Lindbergh became world famous for his great transatlantic flight of 1927, but since then, something strange would happen that would then change his life, his family’s life, and the entire world of crime stopping forever. Charles Lindbergh’s son was kidnapped out of nowhere at around 20 months old, and the police started a frantic search. After around 2 years, the police tracked down the possible kidnapper down to a German immigrant named Bruno Hauptmann. The entire world wanted him to be guilty, but was he really?

During, trial it was brought to light that the nurse

2 Theories About The Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping Kidnapping. Taking someone away illegally by force, typically to obtain a ransom. The Lindberghs were a sweet family and everyone loved them, especially after they had their first son, or that 's what everyone thought. The Lindbergh’s son was killed after being kidnapped from their house in New Jersey. The mystery behind the Lindbergh baby kidnapping can be summed up in the theories: it was done by Bruno Hauptmann or Charles Lindbergh helped the kidnapper.

The jury was shown videos of more normal times for the family, when things seemed to be going well. Expert testimony also played a role in the outcome of the first trial. The evidence presented in this case was able to help the jury come to a decision when determining Mrs. Yates final

Also told the judge, the defense 's argument is not newly discovered evidence and the defense knew of this expert during trial. "There 's nothing new for counsel at the time of trial. As far as presentation at trial, the fact that is may have surprised defense counsel, I think they had time prior to trial to get their expert around. I think they were more so upset because we had the better expert," said Rider-Ulacco. Judge Peter Bradstreet denied the defense request for a new trial.

For them to know the defendant they would be biased in their decisions. The arraignment clause makes the charges clear and understandable. It used to be that people would be put in jail without the knowledge of what they were put there for. Confrontation clause deals with the witness in a trial. The defendant now has the right to have the witness directly involved be brought to the stand.

COURTS The court system is made up of many operational parts that all work together to achieve an overall goal. For my courtroom observation I have chosen the State of Florida v Casey Marie Anthony trial. This trail took place on the 23rd floor of the Orange county courtroom in Florida which seats about 50 people. Casey Marie Anthony (the defendant) is on trial for the death of her two-year-old daughter Caylee Marie Anthony. She is being tried for first degree murder, aggravated child abuse, aggravated manslaughter of a child, and four counts of providing false information to police.

Innocent people who are incriminated under improper evidence are hanged. Parallel in the McMartin day care abuse case, the McMartin family, who administrate the establishment, and other members are accused illegally of having abused sexually numerously of the children under their vigilance. The accusations used against the McMartin

2 Theories About The Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping. Taking someone away illegally by force, typically to obtain a ransome. The Lindberghs were a sweet family and everyone loved them, especially after they had their first son, or that 's what everyone thought. The Lindberghs son was kidnapped and killed from their house in New Jersey. The mystery behind the Lindbergh baby kidnapping can be summed up in the theories: it was done by Bruno Hauptmann or Charles Lindbergh helped the kidnapper.

During the trials the only evidence to prove the accused of guilty or not guilty came from children. The only type of evidence they had was spectral evidence. Spectral evidence is evidence based upon dreams or visions. Spectral evidence is no longer permitted in the court due to it not being valid. Social injustice was committed by hanging those accused by the children without hard evidence.

Procedural History • The State of Minnesota convicted Kelbel in violation of first-degree murder, past pattern of child abuse, and second-degree murder. • The Supreme Court of Minnesota sentenced Kelbel to life in prison. • Kelbel first appealed that the jury must find beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed the violations. • Secondly, Kelbel appealed that the evidence presented was insufficient.

3. How did the defense attorney's attitude change as the trial process progressed (cite specific examples)? The defense becomes more confident as evidence that is more bogus was presented from the DA. For example, when he said that the children had not been abused and their thoughts on abuse and the satanic acts had been coached by the therapists.

The police was called and there were threats to press criminal charges against the

Both men were successful in their appeals as a verdict of guilty could not be settled upon as the case was based on improbabilities and circumstantial evidence that could not lead to a definite