CHAPTER THREE
3.0.0: INTRODUCTION
The Legal framework on Mass Media and Human rights represents aset of rules which is closely associated with the promotion and protection of individual rights especially right to freedom of expression which provided an avenue for freedom of speech which is a key to democracy and to the realization of all human rights. This was recognized by the UN General Assembly at its very first session, in Resolution 59(I), adopted on 14 December 1946, which states: “Freedom of information is a fundamental human right and ... the touchstone of all the freedoms to which the United Nations is consecrated.” The regulation of the media is mostly left to the government. Legal framework regulating the Media and Human rightsare
…show more content…
In 1975, the federal government took over the control of Nigeria 's broadcast media. However, in 1979 the Federal Military Government promulgated Decree No. 105 repealing certain decrees made between 1966 and 1979 which were not in consonance with the operation of democratic government. The two decrees repealed under Decree 105 were The Circulation of Newspapers Decree of 1966 and The Newspaper (Prohibition of Circulation) Decree of 1967. The Federal Government passed the Newspaper Amendment Act in 1964. The Act replaced the Seditious Offences Ordinance passed by the British Government in 1909 'to deal with the newspapers whose activities were getting more and more on the nerves of the British Government’
Mass media policy in Nigeria began with the 1979 Constitution, the original draft failed to define the role of Nigeria media or guarantee their freedom during the post military regime, but after opposition from the Nigerian press and other Nigerians, a vague amendment to the draft constitution was made to protect the freedom of the press during the civilian regime, It is felt that right to freedom of expression is one of the most basic rights in any democratic society and it should be a right to which every Nigerian should be entitled whether or not he is employed by the press
…show more content…
The act in its preamble provides for the act to make public records and information more freely available, provides for public access to public records and information, protects public records and information to the extent consistent with the public interest and the protection of personal privacy, protects serving public officers from adverse consequences for disclosing certain kinds of official information without authorization; and establishes procedures for theachievement of those purposes and for related matters. The promulgation of the act is a watershed in the annals of the protection of the right to freedom of expression in Nigeria. Prior to its enactment, Nigeria had no law which guaranteed access to public records and information,rather a plethora of laws prevents civil servants from divulging official facts and figures, notably the Official Secrets Act which makes it an offence not only for civil servants to give out government information but also for anyone to receive or reproduce such information. The Freedom of Information Act therefore creates the right of access to information in the custody of or under the control of public institutions or authorities and establishes a legal regime for the exercise and/or
This media is much needed because with knowledge of what is right, wrongful doings can be
Section 2(b) guarantees freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including the freedom of the press and other media of
The Act does not allow not only spying but also a lot of other activities, including certain kinds of expressions .that a person will be punished with fine or go to prison for not more than ten years if he or she copies, takes, makes, or obtain anything connected with the national defense. The Act will find any one a criminal if he or she is found getting information with respect to the national defense with a reason to believe
In today's world, human rights still face many challenges and problems. There are still political systems and behaviors in the world that do not respect human rights, such as dictatorial regimes, racial discrimination, gender discrimination, poverty, hunger, and other issues. In addition, new technology and globalization trends have brought new challenges to human rights protection, such as privacy protection, digital rights, and other
Murder, the Media, and the Politics of Public Feelings is a book analyzing two murders that took place and brought attention to the collapsing political experience in the United States of America. The first murder was the pummeling of Matthew Shepard. Shepard was a gay, male student from Laramie, Wyoming, who attended the University of Wyoming. One night Matthew went to a bar and at the end of the night he was seen leaving with two males. The suspects claimed that they pretended to be gay in order to rob Shepard.
Censorship was also implemented against the press.
The 1966 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) was drafted in response to demands from leaders in the press and key individuals within Congress for greater access to government information in order to strengthen accountability in its personnel practices, domestic and foreign intelligence gathering efforts, foreign policy decisions, and other activities. The FOIA serves as a mechanism for the public?s right to know which in effect threatens the government?s right to protect state secrets and other privileged information. As a result, the process of implementing, interpreting, and applying the FOIA over time has been shaped by these competing interests. This article begins with a brief history of the origins of the act, followed by a description
Introduction Technology today is an everyday essential tool used for almost every task done throughout the day. With the evolution of advanced technology, media, along with its forms of distribution, has evolved as well. Popular social media sites that allow you to express yourself on the internet are direct results of the growth of modern day technology. With the growth of social media and people’s free reign to post what they like as they feel, regulating laws and the First Amendment’s restrictions on what is and is not protected come into question. This has created todays debate on the ethical aspect of regulating social media and the First Amendments role in protection of modern day media, raising questions such as should the law protect
In the 1915 case of Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, the Supreme Court observed that motion pictures do not constitute part of the “press” in the State of Ohio. For this reason, motion pictures were held not entitled to First Amendment protection from censorship. This case arose in response to the passing of a statute, whereby
The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s rights to privacy and freedom from arbitrary governmental intrusions. As a public character, the influence of the president is far from imagination. The words of plaintiff and the judgment of the court would greatly affect the president’s reputation, efficiency, etc. It refers to the privacy. Even though these deeds are not against the law, it drags on the appearance of media, which could harm president’s daily life.
It is to be noted that the “Freedom expression” or Freedom of speech rights that are currently in place, were not present during WW2 and so Newspapers could not publish whatever content they wanted to. Censorship aimed to prevent important tactical information from being intercepted by enemy hands, prevent the spread of rumours and fake news about Australia’s military and maintain morale on the home front. Both private transfers of information, including letters from the warfront soldiers to families at home and public reporting in newspapers, radio and film, were heavily censored. An example of censorship’s unpopularity was in 1944 when journalists were so aggravated by the suppression of information, that some Sydney newspapers printed blank spaces throughout articles where Censors had removed content, to show the public the large amounts of information they had not been allowed to publish. This action breached the National Security Regulations and police were involved to stop the distribution of these newspapers.
In a democracy, freedom of speech and the press must be accorded great respect, but other values such as national security, the protection of reputation or public safety sometimes conflict with First Amendment guarantees. Discuss the approaches that have been used by the Supreme Court to define the limits on expression. How have these approaches been applied in specific cases? Several restrictions have been formulated on expression.
Minorities have made significant strides toward autonomy and equality in America society. Movies, television shows and the news are all part of the negative representation of minorities. Also, there is a lack of minority on television and most of the time. The minority character that does exist tends to be secondary to a white protagonist often the best friend or “the bad guy.” The media can also serve to affirm social and cultural diversity and, moreover, provide crucial space in and through which imposed identities or the interests of others can be resisted, challenged and change.
A media source which ignores or censors important issues and events severely damages freedom of information. Many modern tabloids, twenty four hour news channels and other mainstream media sources have increasingly been criticized for not conforming to general standards of journalistic integrity. In nations described as authoritarian by most international think-tanks and NGOs media ownership is generally something very close to the complete state control over information in direct or indirect ways. Undesirable consequences which occur due to media imperialism are: • Commercially driven ultra-powerful mass market media is primarily loyal to sponsors i.e. advertisers and government rather than to the public interest.
But the positive interaction of government-press-society does not mean that each party must lose the function of its functional idealism. For if each existence is not approached with independent and interdependent responsibilities and obligations, it can be ascertained that each party will not be able to assume its rights and responsibilities. It means that the government should be given authority, as an authorized and responsible body to regulate the interests and spheres of its citizens. The press must remain authorized to carry out its distinctive social control functions.