ipl-logo

How Does Section 319 (2) Of The Criminal Code Prohibits Hate Propaganda

549 Words3 Pages

James Keegstra was a high school teacher in Alberta, who lost his teaching license in 1984. Keegstra taught his students that the Holocaust was made up by the Jews to receive sympathy from society. Therefore, Keegstra was accused of being discriminatory towards the Jewish community. Section 319(2) of the criminal code prohibits hate propaganda, not including in private conversations. Subsection 2(b) of the Charter protects hate propaganda because it is a form of expression. Therefore, subsection 319(2) of the criminal code violated subsection 2(b) of the Charter. Section 319(2) of the criminal code establishes a reasonable limit on freedom of expression under section 1 of the charter. The court found that section 319(2) of the Criminal Code did not violate freedom of expression as guaranteed by section 2(b) of the Charter. The crown appealed the court of appeals decision to the Supreme Court of Canada, in the case R v. Keegstra. In December 1990, the court upheld Keegstra’s conviction because section 319(2) of the Criminal …show more content…

Keegstra appealed to the Court of Queen’s Bench, before his trial, for an order to overturn the charge. The defense argued that the appeal should be allowed because sections 319(2) and 319(3) (a) of the Criminal Code are constitutional. Section 319(3) (a) of the code states that a person cannot be convicted of promoting hate if he or she establishes that the statement is true, guaranteed in section 11 of the Charter. However, Keegstra was unable to demonstrate the truth of the many prejudice statements he made to his students and many of Keegstra’s former students testified against him. Keegstra appealed his conviction and claimed the conviction was in violation of section 2(b). Section 2(b) guarantees freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including the freedom of the press and other media of

Show More
Related

Kim Keegestra's Case And Bertham Cates Inherit The Wind

640 Words | 3 Pages

Kim Keegestra’s case and Bertham Cates’ case in Inherit the Wind are similar as both Keegestra and Cates taught in a small town and broke the law, yet Keegestra and Cates are different as to how they taught/interpreted their lessons. One way in which Jim Kessestra and Bertham Cates’ case are similar is through them both breaking the law. Firstly, Keesgestra promotes hatred against an identifiable group (Jews) that violates the law. Though it was his opinion and we know in Canada that every Canadian has the rights of freedom of speech though what Keegestra did was different since he was expressing his own opinion about his hatred for Jewish people into his classroom. During his first trial, “he was charged with unlawfully promoting hatred against

Read More

RV Stinchcombe's Case: Precedent Set For Canada

880 Words | 4 Pages

Firstly, this case set precedent that when a criminal proceeding is initiated against an accused

Read More

Korematsu Case Law

438 Words | 2 Pages

Moreover, the fact that this case was not over turned even though it was recognized as a gross mistake is interesting in itself. Forty years after the fact in the case of Korematsu v. United States, 584 F.supp. 1406 (N.D. Cal. 1984), Korematsu’s writ of coram nobis was granted. A writ of coram nobis allows a court to correct the error of fact in an original judgment. This eradicated Korematsu’s previous conviction.

Read More

Kevin Swanson Case Study

1816 Words | 8 Pages

The following paragraphs will provide an analysis of the First Amendment issues posed in this

Read More

Zundel's Did Six Million Really Die?

1134 Words | 5 Pages

The Supreme court ruled that Section 181 of the Criminal Code intersects section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees the right to freedom of expression as long as the expression is not violent. They defined that the booklet that he created was not violent and allowed under the concept of freedom of expression as the form is different from the content in this scenario thus, the allegation made did not apply. The court found that section 181's attempt to censor all expressions unjustifiable since many acceptable expressions could fit that description. According to analysis, section 181 was a reasonable limit on freedom of expression in a free and democratic society. In the end, majority of the Supreme Court held that section 181 of the Criminal Code was unconstitutional and therefore, his conviction was overturned even though this is not what most wanted, the situation was dealt in this matter due to the

Read More

Should Neo Nazis Be Allowed Free Speech Analysis

1043 Words | 5 Pages

Thane Rosenbaum, in his “Should Neo-Nazis Be Allowed Free Speech?” essay, used the Supreme courts justifying the right of a church group opposing gays serving in the military to picket the funeral of a dead marine with signs that read, “God Hates Fags” as well as neo-Nazis marching in a holocaust survivors’ town as an opportunity to oppose on justifying hate speeches with offensive intentions. Even though it was a strong topic, by missing an ethos appeal and stressing pathos appeal, Rosenbaum failed to make an effective and convincing argument. Rosenbaum did not share that his parents survived the holocaust, and that he is heavily involved in opposing the Nazi regime. He is a law professor in the U.S., and he was also visiting professor at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University in Israel, where he has been a frequent speaker, including at the annual Yom HaShoah Lecture hosted jointly by the American Society for Yad Vashem and Cardozo 's Program in Holocaust & Human Rights Studies on “Remember How the Law Went Horribly Wrong”; the 60th anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials on "A Reappraisal and Their Legacy"; and as the Uri & Caroline Bauer Distinguished Lecturer on Rosenbaum 's book, “The Myth of Moral Justice."

Read More

Supreme Court Case: Gregg V. Georgia 1976

1304 Words | 6 Pages

Gregg v. Georgia 1976 Constitutional Question: Is the death penalty constitutional, or is it a violation of his 8th and 14th amendment rights? Background Information: In 1976, a man named Gregg was tried and and found guilty for the murder of two people. After his trail he was sentenced to death.

Read More

Fourth Amendment Pros And Cons Essay

562 Words | 3 Pages

This was called the bill of rights which was the first 10 amendments to our constitution. The first amendment covers are civil liberties. The freedom of speech is where we can say what we want about the government without getting in trouble. The freedom of press is where we can print what we want as long as it 's not a lie.

Read More

Constitutional Act Of 1982 Essay

953 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution Act of 1982 was imperative in addressing the above concerns with the Canadian Bill of Rights, since it is a part of the constitution that provides solid, expansive grounds to the protection of individual rights. This was received with both excitement and trepidation. According to the Constitution Act of 1982, our Charter of Rights and

Read More

How Did The Alien And Sedition Acts Violate The Constitution

566 Words | 3 Pages

The first amendment states that “Congress cannot enact laws limiting ”the freedom of speech or press.”’ (Kentucky Resolutions) Again, in short, this amendment is saying that the federal government is not able to pass a law that takes away someone’s right to speak their opinion. Contrary to this amendment, the Federal government did exactly the opposite of what the amendment said was allowed. The acts, passed by John Adams, take away the human right of speaking what is on the mind and using what they say to show them off as a threat.

Read More

Essay On First Amendment In College Campus

754 Words | 4 Pages

This section is an extension of the privacy act. It states that you have the right to say what you may. However, it is the same way with the freedom of speech. You are allowed to express your opinion on multiple topics. You cannot say anything that is sensitive or may cause a rally or fight.

Read More

Prison Releasee Reoffender Act (PRA)

972 Words | 4 Pages

He appealed his conviction and sentence to the Fourth District Court of Appeal and they affirmed that the Act does not violate any constitutionality challenged the defendant. Facts 1. The defendant committed to serve time for certain crimes and he was prison released in August 1996. 2.

Read More

Censorship Of The First Amendment Essay

865 Words | 4 Pages

Censorship of The First Amendment This paper will discuss how censorship denies citizens of the United States our full rights as delineated in the First Amendment. It will outline how and why the first amendment was created and included in the Constitution of the United States of America. This paper will also define censorship, discuss a select few legal cases surrounding freedom of speech and censorship as well as provide national and local examples of censorship.

Read More

What Is The Effect Of Steven Truscott On Harper's Rights

461 Words | 2 Pages

Steven Truscott, at the age of 14 years old, was sentenced to the death penalty for supposedly murdering his classmate, Lynn Harper. A short and unfair trial ensued that violated many rights given to this young man in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The rights that were violated include the right to not be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned, to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this Charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Fighting Words

680 Words | 3 Pages

On the sidewalks of Rochester in the year 1942, Walter Chaplinsky was arrested for repeating ' You are a God damned racketeer' and 'a damned Fascist’ to a police officer. Chaplinsky’s statements violated a New Hampshire law prohibiting offensive, derisive, or annoying words or sounds said unto an individual or party in a public place. He appealed the decision of the District Court, and when it came to the Supreme Court, they came to a profound decision. Supreme Court Justice Murphy said there are certain words that could reasonably result in a fight or a breach of peace when uttered.

Read More

More about How Does Section 319 (2) Of The Criminal Code Prohibits Hate Propaganda

Related Topics

Open Document