Summary We are living in a century of revolution and great advancements in many fields of biology. These advancements and discoveries are for improving accuracy in different traditional methods or approaches. However, in the field of taxonomy, the problem regarding species concept has never been solved since early 1700s and some biologists still thinks this is impossible. Due to different views, beliefs and descriptions amongst biologists, many species concepts has been proposed, each with it is merits and limitations but there is no single accepted definition of a species. Morphological species concept is the traditional concept that has been used to identify and classify species accordingly. However, discoveries and advancements in molecular biology (genomics) has caused some controversies and conflicts as it produces results that are incongruent to those obtained when applied morphological species concept. Although morphological species concept has unique advantages over other species concept such as pertinency to museum/herbarium specimens, fossil species, it also simple and cost effective and uses ontogenetic information, cryptic species and homology are still not accommodated by this concept. According to some studies, incorporating genetic and morphological data (integration …show more content…
Why should we still proceed to use morphological species concept? The most obligating reason to proceed collecting morphological data advance to the future is to settle the phylogenetic correlations of fossil taxa as well as their ‘kinship’ to existing taxa (Scotland et al., 2003). Therefore, the rebuilt Tree of Life must accommodate fossil taxa. According to some approximations, nearly 99% of the evolved species are currently extinct and their majority were ecologically vital, diverse and very different from existing congeners (Wiens, 2004). Current and future relationships of many fossil taxa can only be ascertained by phylogenetic analysis of morphological data (Mallet,
Chapter 1: 1: The author and his colleagues chose to focus on 375 million year old rocks because they were looking for a missing link. They had found fish without amphibious qualities in rocks 10 million years older than their focus age, and 10 million years later the focus age they had found amphibians that looked different than fish. Thus sending them on the search for a missing link. The type of rock these fossils where found in were sedimentary because sedimentary allows the fossil to be preserved inside of it. The igneous and metamorphic rocks are formed from lava and extreme heat/pressure (igneous formed by lava and metamorphic formed by intense heat and pressure).
As my team and I discovered a new fossil in our excavation project, the unknown site yielded the skull of a mysterious specimen. Our goal as reputable anthropologist was to analyze the specimen to the best of our ability so our team can provide the most probable and reliable taxonomic identification. In order for us to effectively interpret the results our experiment yielded, we needed to review our knowledge in human evolution. The field that uncovers the mystery of the evolution of humans is paleoanthropology, the study of human evolution through the fossil record.
Dr. John Whitmore’s Argument for Biblical Truth Based on the Fossil Record Dr. John Whitmore, a geology professor at Cedarville University, presented a compelling case for Young Earth Creationism and Noah’s Flood in his discussion entitled “How Does the Fossil Record Support a Biblical View of Earth History?” His argument centered on ten key points, which he called the “10 Lessons from the Fossil Record.” Each of these ‘lessons’ emphasized the discrepancies between what evolutionists have expected to find in the fossil and geologic records and the data that has actually been observed and recorded.
Due to the aforementioned factors, we are tempted to see the species of today as a monument of the theory of evolution, but it actually undercuts the facts of evolution. Furthermore, a number of misconceptions have erupted throughout the years for the sole reason of not having an appropriate explanation for the facts of the theory of evolution. We are forced to accept wrong notions for us to be able to fully understand the said
The first fossilized fish appear buried below the first fossilized amphibians which appear below the first fossilized reptiles which appear below the first fossilized birds and mammals. This is consistent with the Darwinian model of origins which says that birds and mammals evolved from reptiles which evolved from amphibians which evolved from fish. Not everything about the order in which fossils are found supports Darwin’s theory however. The basic structure of known
Sallan and Andrew Galimberti, the co-author of the study, looked at the fossil records of over one-thousand species of vertebrates that were alive during the ninety-six million year period before and after the mass extinction. For sixty million years the size of the vertebrates steadily increased in size reaching up to sizes matching a school bus. However, the vertebrate species that survived the mass extinction during the thirty-six million year period following the mass extinction were much smaller compared to the size of the vertebrates before the extinction. In fact, most of the surviving species observed by the team were measured to be less than forty centimeters in length. Information about this adaptation was published earlier in The Science Magazine, which stated that this change is unrelated to the climate and oxygen levels at the time.
Humans use bipedal locomotion, yet there was a time in our ancestral history where a different mode of locomotion existed, which gives rise to the controversy introduced in this paper. Roughly 2.5 m.y.a. (million years ago), Homo habilis evolved from our closest ancestors, chimpanzees and gorillas giving us the first known genus Homo. Around 1.9 m.y.a. , and approximately 600 thousand years following the evolution of Homo species, a differentiation in gait occurred where; according to some, Homo erectus began running to acquire prey.
How Should the Unknown Organism Be Classified? Introduction: In science taxonomy is used to classify different organisms into the hierarchy of taxonomy, this helps separate organisms by species, genus, family, class, phylum, kingdoms and domains and allows for comparing and contrasting of different organisms. The question presented to our group was "How should the unknown organism be classified?".
The discovery of this mammal was proof that mammals had lived alongside the dinosaurs. It gave scientist a small glimpse into ancient mammal species. Chapter 6– Questions
To put this into perspective, paleontologists scale life’s history down to an earth year in which humans did not appear until the very last day of the calendar year. In fact, most of life has consisted of single-celled organisms. The first bodies were not even really seen until the 1920s, and when they were finally discovered, people didn’t even pay much attention, that is until Martin Glassner came around. Glassner, after observing the findings of Martin Gurich and Reginald Sprigg, proved, without a doubt, that their fossils where 15 million to 20 million years older; these fossils came from the Precambrian period, a period thought to to be absent of life. Some of these fossils resembled primitive creature such as jellyfish and sponges, but the patterns found on some of the others matched absolutely zero living creatures.
Gould’s work lacks credibility and fails to complete an accurate explanation for the extinction of dinosaurs. In order to have been completely wiped out from the face of Earth,
Perhaps the most misleading aspect of a dinosaur 's prehistoric figure may simply prove to compromise a reality of inhumane creatures that demolish and create unique structures thus reuniting and additionally eliminating the openly incredibly rescinding factor which could possibly lead to an overall
Fossils are the preserved remains of plants and animals. Fossils are usually found in the earth’s crust in either a frozen form, petrified form, or trapped in a substance like tar or amber. An example of fossils are the bones of dinosaurs that have gone extinct after a massive meteorite impacted the earth at the end of the cretaceous period. Another type of fossil is a trace fossil. These fossils are not the fossilized organism itself but they are the indirect evidence that the organism had once existed.
If evolution was a true event that happened, there should be many transitional species today that scientists could study. Today scientists don’t have any live animals that are thought to be a transitional species that is going to evolve into something else. With similar species thought to come from a common ancestor, all traits of one of the species should be found in the other species in about the same area. There are many cases where two species have many things in common, but the two species also have some very distinct characteristics that are unbridgeable between the two. This means that there had to have been different ancestors that had things about them that kept them from having a common
The fossils found north of Johannesburg, South Africa, are of a previously unknown species, classified as Australopithecus sediba, with a mix of traits belonging to Australopithecus and Homo. The pelvis of the two individuals found so far were similar to that of H. erectus indicating they were bipedal, however their long arms associate them with Australopithecus-like tree-dwellers. Other juxtaposed traits include; small brain with an expanded frontal region, a human-like ankle and a primitive heel, small hands and ape-like grasping capabilities.