‘The British Government’s response to the Hunger Strikes was counter-productive’
The Hunger Strikes was a series of protests that occurred from 1976 to 1981 which was caused by the Irish Republican Army members in British prisons against the British to gain the right to be treated as ‘prisoners of war’ rather than normal prisoners. Even though the Strikes began during the 1976, the main events occurred during the 1980-1981 Second Hunger Strikes which consisted of the main strikes, protests and verdicts from the British Government. Through these events, Irish prisoner’s demands were not granted by the British government and this response was seen as counter-productive due to the increase in nationalist hostility towards the British, the increased
…show more content…
The Special Category Status was a list of rights passed to prisoners whose crimes consisted of political related offenses such as causing riots and protest for the sake of a certain political party such as IRA. Having this status meant that the prisoners had freedom to rights that does not imply for other prisoners such as not wearing prison uniform, more visits allowed and more social time with other prisoners of the same status. The removal of the Special Category Status from the prisoners caused the beginning of many strong protest movements such as the Hunger Strikes, No Wash protest, Blanket protest and Dirty protest. All these protests consisted of the prisoners using various methods they can take advantage of to show their …show more content…
“On 1st March 1981 the IRA prisoners’ Officer Commanding, Bobby Sands refused food. He was to be joined by a new hunger striker each week and this way the strike would lead to a prisoner dying each week, thus increasing the pressure on the British Government” (bbc.co.uk, n.d.). This quote is about the IRA leader within the Maze prison, Bobby Sands who is an example of the types of people that influenced the nationalist population of Ireland. Stories of these protestors and the British government denying them caused a great increase in the support of IRA. An example of the growing support is also reflected due to the strong British stance against the prisoners gaining these rights. Over the period of the Hunger Strike, prisoners chose death over giving in to the British rule. Many of these actions received large media attention all over Ireland and this led to many nationalist thinking that supporting the IRA was the best way to eliminate the British rule over Ireland. This increased amount of supporters led to the strengthening of the IRA and increased their influence in the political control over Ireland due to the counter-productive response available from the British
This stirred up feelings against the British and caused more people to join the patriots and support the fight for independence. (Document
As they stay longer and longer in the camps, the prisoners began to become former shells of themselves and just had their physical presence to define them. They denied everything, not just human rights, but also their heart, soul, dignity, pride, bravery, confidence, and the
The author uses words like “struggle”, “frustrated,” and “yearning” to give a very descriptive and clear picture of what nonviolent resistance looks like. The author
Dozens of starving men fought desperately over a few crumbs. The worker watched the spectacle with great interest” (Wiesel 101). This shows how the prisoners are being dehumanized and are being treated less than human.
John Dalberg-Acton, an English historian, politician, and writer, once stated, “In every age [liberty's] progress has been beset by its natural enemies: by ignorance and superstition, by lust of conquest and by love of ease, by the strong man's craving for power, and the poor man's craving for food.” The previously shared quote mentions many of the key aspects behind the start and duration of the holocaust. Prisoners in Hitler’s harsh death camps often found themselves forced to make one-sided choiceless choices. They were presented with false options as both paths lead to one final predetermined fate, death. However, despite the exorbitant odds, a few lucky prisoners have survived under such tyranny.
Because of this Beneson submitted an article to the newspaper, the Observer, that exhibits his thoughts on their imprisonment was an abuse of their human rights. It was in this article where he promoted
John Howard who disputed for prison reforms in order to make them suitable for human necessities. Firstly, people were being tried and convicted of crimes they never did and second of all, the prisons they were detained in were not fit for human survival. “You see prisoners, covered (hardly covered) with rags; almost famished; and sick of diseases” (Perry 81). The prisoners were infected with several diseases and other famine due to unsanitary conditions. They also lacked enough food and water needed to survive and were forced to sleep on hard floors and were loaded with heavy irons to torture them.
In the novel “1984” by George Orwell, the Inner Party uses cruelty in a politically and socially effective way by using methods such as torture, starvation, imprisonment, and room 101 as crucial motivation for those being tortured to not only confess but repent of their sins against the party. Furthermore, the use of cruelty by the Inner Party unveils both the victim and perpetrator’s inner conscience. The use of cruelty throughout “1984” by the Inner Party and O’Brien reveals how cruelty functions in the work as a means of oppression and a catalyst of subservience.
It pains me to say that I will not have the satisfaction of giving each and every one of those people who escaped or not the credit and appraisal that they so dutifully deserve. No, in this essay I will be focusing on three people, each with their own hardships and their own “imprisonments”, whether those “imprisonments” were literal or not; they deserve to be appraised. All three of these people contrast against each other greatly but, at the same time have immense comparisons. For example, all three of these people are minorities but, only two of them are male.
And they beat m e ... A g a i n … I can't go on” (Wiesel 110). This shows that some of the prisoners had no mercy for even a dying man. It proves that they were given nothing and that they would have to fight if they wanted to live. The second thing that this quote shows is that these people were desperate.
This caused sympathy for the prisoners and the public demanded their
The famine was caused by a combination of a population explosion, the tenant farmer system, Irish dependance on a single food source, the appearance of a terrible blight, British laws, and insufficient response of the British government. The
One reason the American Revolution was avoidable was Britain could have been fair to the colonists. As shown in the Legislation Bank, the colonists were victim to many different
Orwell, through his characters and their behaviors shows how capital punishment will eventually lead to the degradation of the humanity and violation of the sanctity of human life. In the story, the prisoner and his behavior plays a vital role to convey the message. He was treated as if he were an animal. “We were waiting outside the condemned cells, a row of the sheds fronted with double bars, like small animal cage” (Orwell 100). Thorough this episode Orwell reveals how the prisoner was treated before he was executed.
Because of the barbarism employed by Cromwell’s men, towns surrendered which made Cromwell’s conquest a much easier feat. Small troops of guerilla’s set up in places like the Wicklow mountains, soley to attack Cromwell’s Parliamentairans. This then led to famine and a bubonic plague. The guerilla warfare eventually ended in late 1652, when Parliamentarians signed an agreement that allowed the Irish to serve in foreign