ipl-logo

Peter Singer Argument

495 Words2 Pages

The less fortunate are often overlooked because of their distance in the world. Contrary to this popular belief, philosopher Peter Singer believes that distance is both irrelevant and insignificant when helping others. Throughout this essay, I will argue in favor of Singer’s arguments. I believe Singer is accurate when he claims distance is irrelevant when human lives are at stake. Privileged people should always help the less fortunate as long as they are not sacrificing anything of comparable moral value. I will first summarize Singer’s interpretation of distance and moral responsibility and the examples he uses to further explain it. Then I will legitimize why distance is irrelevant in the given situation of famine and morality. Lastly, …show more content…

In addition, he explains that these fatal instances are not inevitable, and they can be stopped. Therefore, he believes we all must do everything in our power to prevent starvation and famine from occurring. Singer’s only condition is to help others without sacrificing anything of comparable value. For instance, do not give money to the needy if by doing that you will become poor yourself. In his explanation he uses a drowning baby as an example. If a man witnesses an innocent child drowning in a nearby pond, he should not be concerned about getting muddy or ruining his brand new pair of shoes, he should save the baby, because dirtying a pair of clean shoes or getting wet is not giving up something of comparable moral value ( Singer (1972), pg. 231). Additionally, Singer clarifies the distance between charity and duty. He explains charity is something that is beyond duty and it is not required for everyone to participate. And this explains why a charitable person is praised for their actions and an uncharitable man is not condemned. Singer believes that duty is required for every person (Singer (1927), pg. 235). Ultimately, Singer believes that the fortunate need to drastically revise their way of thinking. Giving to famine relief should be thought of as a duty rather than charity and should be morally required by everyone

Show More
Related

  • John Proctor Sacrifice

    1097 Words  | 5 Pages

    In hard times sacrifices must be made in order to determine the moral characters of an individual in their society

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Can The Law Make Us Be Decent? By Jay Sterling Silver

    1294 Words  | 6 Pages

    Without the cruelty of the world, there would be no need for aid, however, it may not be the case. Although society has good samaritans, many people will not be insured safety unless there are more individuals with good morals to provide assistance. As the result of needing aid, there are human beings in the public to reveal they are ethically responsible, even if it is through obligations. In which, tells what the meaning of ethical responsibility is; it is to have the duty to follow a morally correct path and doing what is right for people or oneself. In the article, “Can the Law Make Us Be Decent?”

    Read More

  • Responses To The Poor Between 1450 And 1700

    1468 Words  | 6 Pages

    Between 1450 and 1700, almost half of Europe was living in poverty. As famine, war, and economic dislocation grew rampant, there were regions where 80 percent of the population faced starvation daily. The massive poor population led to a myriad of attitudes and responses towards the poor, including that the poor were idle, that they needed to be regulated, that helping the poor was the moral thing to do, and that the poor should be helped because it will improve the life of the donor.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Quality Of Life In John Steinbeck's Cannery Row

    277 Words  | 2 Pages

    This chapter shows how the quality of human life is dependent upon intentions and heart, rather than the status of a

    Read More

  • Shera And Boba Singer

    318 Words  | 2 Pages

    Singer commits the fallacy of emotionally charged language when he accuses people who do not donate money to charity as morally. He accuses people who do not donate money to charity as morally wrong. He is arguing that if Americans do not donate money to save children lives overseas they are morally wrong. If you do not donate to children overseas, you are morally wrong by causing their deaths. We know in other countries or in our countries there are children who suffer from poverty that do not have food, clothing or anything that is necessary for them to survive and by this Singer arguing here that in the case of Dora and Boba they both did not assist in their lives of needy children; but rather for money and luxury than saving lives.

    Read More

  • Peter Singer Famine, Affluence And Morality

    1562 Words  | 7 Pages

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Peter Singer condemns the inactivity of affluent countries in aiding East Bengali refugees. Building on the discussion of famine relief, he moves to argue for his major contention, which is the altering of moral conceptual scheme so that affluent countries become morally obliged to assist needy regions, thereby eliminating inequality (Akintayo, 2013). This essay will first identify major arguments in support of the contention. It then applies the framework of critical thinking to evaluate each argument and culminate in reflecting on the previous analysis.

    Read More

  • Peter Singer's Argument In Famine, Affluence And Morality

    3128 Words  | 13 Pages

    Philip Manning 12504697 Q) Evaluate Peter Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. There can be no doubt that Peter Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’ is unrealistic, unfair and not sustainable. Singer’s arguments are valid arguments but not sound. In order to get a clear and balanced view of my arguments which disprove the Singer article, it is first necessary to examine and lay out the main aspects of Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. My arguments against Singer’s claims shall then be detailed and examined in depth.

    Read More

  • Singer Solution To World Poverty Argument

    1292 Words  | 6 Pages

    While pointing out that it is much easier to ignore an appeal for money to help those you’ll never meet than to consign a child to death, Singer uses his utilitarian philosophy to deflect the argument, stating that “if the upshot of the American’s failure to donate the money is that one more kid dies… then it is, in some sense, just as bad as selling the kid to the organ peddlers.” This argument, however, can only be made while using false dilemmas. Singer also addresses a large criticism of his work, that one can’t decide moral issues by taking opinion polls. The argument to this reiterates how the audience would feel being in these situations. This argument is poor as it does not address how the entire article is based on how everyone feels about this particular subject.

    Read More

  • Peter Singer Argument Analysis

    1983 Words  | 8 Pages

    In Peter Singers segment we hear his thoughts on ethics. He makes the argument that anyone would wade into a shallow pond to rescue a drowning girl, even if you were wearing expensive shoes. Then he explains how it is different from not purchasing the shoes, but donating the money to UNICEF to essentially achieve the same type of rescue or prevention of loss of life just through different means.

    Read More

  • Strength In What Remains

    974 Words  | 4 Pages

    Most people want to influence the world and make a difference in the lives of others, but how exactly can one achieve this? Not all people are born into a comfortable life, but those who are have a responsibility to assist people in more unfortunate circumstances. Fortunately, this idea of giving changed the life of an impoverished man named Deogratias. In the book Strength in What Remains by Tracy Kidder, Deo, along with the rest of his country, lived in a deprived state.

    Read More

  • Peter Singer's Argument On Suffering

    1464 Words  | 6 Pages

    As I suggested, Singer might tune his argument to respect human autonomy in arguing for us to donate only as much as is not morally significant in damaging our autonomy rather than our basic biological life. This may do well to make subscribing to his argument more appealing for those who are not utilitarians. Though the argument still misappropriates utilitarianism on a larger scale than intended, Singer must also find a way to create a less demanding argument as well. Regardless, Peter Singer’s argument must be honoured as an important part to modern practical ethics by doing what ethics does best: allowing us to deeply reflect on our modern situation of gluttony, and realize we perhaps do have some duty in one form or another to help the impoverished who desperately need

    Read More

  • The Singer Solution To World Poverty Analysis

    1805 Words  | 8 Pages

    Due to this reason, Singer states that the fair donation argument fails and would not be enough to fix the problem. Now that we have an understanding of Singer’s beliefs, I can show how Singer would respond to the question given in the prompt. Peter would say that yes he should donate, but the small amounts he would be choosing to donate would be nowhere near the amount that he should be choosing to give. Singer would say that any money that he isn’t spending on necessities should be donated to help those in dire situations, and that not doing so is

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty By Peter Singer

    913 Words  | 4 Pages

    What do you do when charitable organizations call you asking for money? Do you donate money to the organization or do you ignore it? In 1999 Peter Singer wrote the article The Singer Solution to World Poverty where he argues “that each one of us with wealth surplus to his or her essential needs should be giving most of it to help people suffering poverty so dire as to be life-threatening.” Singer accomplishes this by introducing his article with two exceptionally different examples: a woman who saved a child’s life and a man who killed a child to save his Bugatti. Secondly, he proposes how much money would be required to save a child from starvation, $200, and explains why a majority people do not give even though $200 is not actually that much money considering what people on other desires.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty

    576 Words  | 3 Pages

    Singer attempts to close this gap with the age old question of ‘why don’t we give the riches’ money to the poor’. The essence of Singer’s argument is obviously end world poverty. Probably the strongest point made in Singer’s argument is the involvement of the whole world. By taking this money from those across the world eliminates the opportunity for indifference. To stand with indifference is to stand with the oppressor.

    Read More

  • Man's Search For Meaning

    1551 Words  | 7 Pages

    They may have been few in number, but they offer sufficient proof that everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms — to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way” (Frankl, 65). Why, when placed in those circumstances, would anyone choose to give away what they need to survive in order to help someone they have no attachment? Even when treated like animals, many humans will remain humane. Even when they may choose inhumanity, like rifling through a dead man’s pockets without offering any dignity, that can be attributed to need, but the remorse will remain (86). True, morals can be outweighed by needs and desires, but the morals will never disappear entirely.

    Read More

More about Peter Singer Argument

Open Document