Politics is a critical element of Richard II, and it is a guiding force of King Henry when he makes the decision to banish Exton. Appearances are crucial to any politicians, but particularly to a new king, such as Henry, who overthrew the last king in a military coup. King Henry shows a great understanding of himself and politics and is a better ruler than Richard because of that knowledge. King Henry has to solidify his rule, authority and power, and he has to do it quickly. A new king, one who gained power by force, cannot allow the murderer of the previous king to remain unpunished. Not punishing Exton for his murder of the king, however, desired that outcome, may have been, would be political suicide for Henry. Earlier in the play, Henry demonstrates his understanding of politics and the importance having the favor of the common people by wooing the crowd as he leaves England …show more content…
His ability to see himself and his actions in others, is his reason for pardoning Aumerle. Further, Henry had promised to pardon Aumerle before he learned of the crime, which could also be a factor. But largely, Henry saw himself in Aumerle later on. Knowing that he had committed the same crime in his conquest for power. “I pardon him as God shall pardon me” (5.3.130), He acknowledges his crime here, and speaks to God pardoning him, for the same crime Aumerle committed. Based on these actions, King Henry’s rule compares to King Richard’s in several ways. Politically, King Henry was more talented, understanding the people and the nature of politics better. However, a comparison of their morals, creates an equation that is equal. Both King Henry and King Richard display the same hypocrisy of banishing someone who was loyal to them, and further, banishing for a crime that the kings asked them to do. King Henry does appear to be more aware of his crimes, as he pardons Aumerle. Whereas, Richard treats more, as a matter of
This is shown through Henry recognising the importance of finance in methods of gaining power through loyalty and outside the country, as stated above and in the use of bonds and recognisances to consolidate his dynasty. This is demonstrated additionally in Henry’s use of the Chamber System where Henry would personally check all the items of income received in the chamber and sign each one, and the position of Treasurer of the Chamber was held by two of the king’s most beloved servants; Sir Thomas Lovell and Sir John Heron. However there is one unconvincing phrase in the interpretation of Henry’s attitude towards money, that his reputation as a miser was a result of a ‘misunderstanding of his policies’ which doesn’t take into account the extortionate reputation of Empsen and Dudley through their exploitation, therefore not showing the full extent of Henry’s dedication to
Patrick Henry presented a monumental speech that convinced the Virginia delegates to consider independence from England. Henry’s speech was one of the many catalysts that tilted the once ambivalent and divided mindsets of the colonists about England to a rebellious sentiment. The powerful speech was delivered on March 23, 1775 which called for opposition against the British; the rapid success of the Henry’s speech can be seen by the first military engagements in the Battles of Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775 shortly after the speech was made at the Virginia Convention. In his speech, Henry attempts to persuade the members of the Convention that war with Britain is inevitable and waiting will only make the war more difficult to win.
‘The consolidation of royal authority, in the years 1487-1509, was due to Henry VII’s control over the nobility.’ Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. It can be argued to a certain extent that the consolidation of royal authority for Henry VII, in the years 1487-1509, was a result of control over the nobility. The challenge lied in the ability to decrease their power without alienating them whilst removing their position of threat. However, there were other contributory factors in Henry’s consolidation of his royal authority, such as his diplomatic skills in dealing with foreign powers and the indispensable use of royal finances.
December 17, 1610, winter has dawned upon the isolated colonial village in Main, Colonial America. Women and children anxiously wait in their cold, chapped wooden cabins encased with sheets of ice and snow for their husbands and fathers. There is no food. The cries of young children, infants, and toddlers fill the emptiness in the cold, wet, air.
Unfortunately, the king occupied himself with the pleasures and benefits of fame and power more than he did with ruling his country effectively. This did not benefit the country in any way.
When he said, "Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself guilty of treason towards my own country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings” (9). He is saying that this is what he entails to achieve for his God. Trying to grant the audience a diverse viewpoint, rather than discrediting their own. During his speech, Henry made biblical references such as, “Different men often see the same subject in different lights" (2). The word light was used by Henry, to show again that his views are like gods, and he is not against them.
He also repeatedly petitioned Pope Clement VII for a divorce, which he was continuously denied. He pushed through the British Parliament acts designed to reduce the influence of the pope’s representatives in England. King Henry’s defiant attitude caused him to believe he was better than everyone else. His arrogant actions made him infamous around the world. While he had six wives, King Henry changed many rules so he would get his way and be as powerful as possible.
Henry the 8th had many control over his people. For example, when he would leave from a building his men would follow him without his request. He also had to give people
But they put themselves in a level with wood and earth and stones [...] than men of straw or a lump of dirt’’. Henry’s ethos shows the audience of his strategy of going against the government corruption. Henry’s speech was well-planned out to shows his audience of his experience when rebelling the government; in addition, receiving forced punishment for not paying his poll-tax. He thought out things that made himself to commit this disobedience against the government and wanted to express his experience of his ideas and strategy to disobey the government.
With the death of his father there was much uncertainty from high officials on entrusting their land in an unmarried adolescent. Henry came into his position already trying to implement change from his father’s dynasty. By doing this he gained a lot respect from many officials. He gained respect from many by absolving many of their crimes and debts. “ Noblemen arrested under suspicion of plotting were set free...
He was fond of gambling, dancing, horse riding, hunting and jousting, which he made a weekly tournament in his early years at the helms of the English throne (Weir 25). Furthermore, his dedication was on warfare with notable wars with France and Scotland in 1513 although both were at a substantial cost (Scarisbrick 620). In most of the times, he delegated his duties of overseeing the running of the government in the hands of Cardinal Wolsey and Thomas More, close associates and confidants whom he would later subject to politically instigated executions (Weir 27). As Scarisbrick notes, King Henry VIII’s reign was characterized by a sense of insecurity, due to the fact that England was always prone to rebellions between its great lords as well as between religious factions (619). During his reign, King Henry VIII has been acclaimed for some notable successes including the strengthening of the English Crown and Monarch with the subsequent enhanced control of the country (Scarisbrick 623).
The implication is that the people are being ruled. Henry used his skills in speech to persuade the Council or Parliament that trying to rule over others was wrong. He spoke out against the way things had always been done and
When he urges Bolingbroke and Mowbry to “forget, forgive; conclude and be agreed” (Act I, scene i, 156), his beautiful poetry is unable to convince them not to fight. Instead of digging his heals in and asserting his authority, he quickly resigns and sets a formal date for a fight, as per the wishes of Gaunt, Bolingbroke, and Mowbry. Similarly, after Richard makes the unpopular decision to wage war in Ireland, Willoughby and Northumberland don’t even give Richard credit for being a poor leader; instead they complain he was “basely led by flatters” (Act II, scene i, 242) who “inform, merely in hate, ‘gainst any of us all.” Provided, pinning Richard’s leadership issues on his advisors could just be a way to get around speaking out against God by proxy of the king, however, even then the king has no agency in the matter and is nothing more than a figurehead. Although Richard goes through the motions of a king, he seems to lack any real
Secondly, the king’s life must be preserved in order to preserve the life of the body politics. As Barker claims, “The figure of the king guarantees, as locus and source of power and as master-signifier, a network of subsidiary relations which constitute the real practice
His father discovers Aumerle’s plot against Henry, and soon he begs for forgiveness and ends up being King Henry's man stating, “Unto my mother's prayers I bend my knee” (5.3. 97). His loyalty interchanged from Richard to Henry because of him asking for forgiveness. Although this is a compulsory switch, his loyalty still