ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Deontology

1202 Words5 Pages

Deontology which is derived from the Greek words Deon (meaning obligation/duty) and logia (science/study) combined to be also known as duty or rule-based ethics or the study of duties or obligations. It is a branch of ethical theories that deals with ethics of conduct, which theories are based on the sort of actions people must perform. It is based on non-consequentialism where the ends do not justify the means and thus deontology is an approach to ethics in which a sense of duty or principle prescribes the ethical decision (Preston, 2007). Deontology affirms duties must be obeyed regardless of the consequences. The theory of Deontology has its flaws as well and this essay will present three criticisms of deontology namely that deontology relies on moral absolutes, allows acts that make the world a worse place, two permissible duties that are right can conflict with each other and will demonstrate these flaws with relevant case studies and dilemmas. To begin with, this theory relies on moral absolutes which can be defined as actions that are entirely right or entirely wrong. Deontologists cannot consider the consequences of their actions, even if the consequences of a particular action bring about more harm than the act itself. Deontology theory says that certain types of actions are either absolutely right or wrong, but provides no way in which to distinguish which action may be right or wrong and thus duties and principles can conflict (Preston, 2007). For instance,

Show More
Related

  • Examples Of Ethical Issues In Up And Vanished Podcast

    1077 Words  | 5 Pages

    They would see that it be their duty and obligation as a judge to provide Ryan Duke with his fair trial that is promised by the Bill of Rights. A deontologist acts solely on the moral obligations that comes with their position. In this case, the deontologist would take the role of the judge which includes the obligations of one. A theorist who focuses on the principle of utility would be considered a consequentialist. The principle of utility intends “to produce the greatest happiness for everyone affected” (Banks, 2017, p. 352).

    Read More

  • National Collegiate Athletic Association: Ethical Issues In Collegiate Sports

    2028 Words  | 9 Pages

    From a deontologist prospective an individual will focus his attention on the moral principles as duties. Individuals have moral duties to do things that are right to do and moral duties not to do things that are wrong to do and to a deontologist whether something is right or wrong doesn’t depend on consequences but rather whether an action is right or wrong in itself. For example if someone is a parent they have a moral duty to provide for their child. Not paying an individual who on most accounts are sacrificing their health and a majority of their time is wrong in itself and using them as a means to generate large sums of money for your school is unfair, which leads to the issue of fairness. Fairness is acknowledged as fulfilling an individual’s agreed upon role in a just system.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism And Deontology In The Place Beyond The Pines

    2519 Words  | 11 Pages

    Deontology, however, views the motive behind

    Read More

  • Essay On Kantian Deontology

    724 Words  | 3 Pages

    One objection to Kantian deontology is that it does not propose a solution where two absolute duties conflict with each other. As previously stated, according to Kant, duties are absolute moral rules and the objective morality grounds on this feature of duties. However, this absolutism leads to possible conflict of duties and Kantian deontology does not provide a form for this kind of situations. For instance, I borrow a pocket knife from my friend and I promise to give it back when she wants back.

    Read More

  • Consequentialism: Jeremy Bentham And John Stuart Mill

    1240 Words  | 5 Pages

    If a man kills someone than in consequentialism the rightness or wrongness of killing must be explained by its consequences : if it has good consequences then it may be right to kill on the other hand ,if has bad consequences then it may be wrong to kill while in deontology the rightness or wrongness of killing cannot be explained simply by its consequeces. The action of killing is wrong in itself, independently of whether they have good consequences. Relativist vs. objectivist According to ethical relativism, whatever you think is right for you really is right for you, and no one can tell you any differently. while ethical objectivism there are such moral values and rules that require one to be honest, just , faithful, among others and such other rules requiring one not to steal, kill, torture.

    Read More

  • Why Is Consequentialism Morally Wrong

    452 Words  | 2 Pages

    This argument might surprise those who think of consequentialism as counterintuitive, but in fact, consequentialists can explain many moral intuitions that trouble deontological theories. Moderate deontologists, for example, often judge that it is morally wrong to kill one person to save five but not morally wrong to kill one person to save a million. They never specify the line between what is morally wrong and what is not morally wrong, and it is hard to imagine any non-arbitrary way for deontologists to justify a cutoff point. In contrast, consequentialists can simply say that the line belongs wherever the benefits outweigh the costs (including any bad side effects). Similarly, when two promises conflict, it often seems clear which one we should keep, and that intuition can often be explained by the amount of harm that would be caused by breaking each promise.

    Read More

  • Kant's Ethics: Jim Doesn T Kill The Indian Man

    1207 Words  | 5 Pages

    As a Kantian, the ultimate goal is to focus on our maxims and not on how much pain or pleasure the act could possibly produce. So as a result, Kant would argue that Jim should not kill the Indian man, even if it would save the other Indian men. The reason why is because Kant does not believe in using people as mere means, it wouldn’t be considered a conceivable maxim, and it would be betraying a perfect duty. The definition of deontology is having the belief that you do what’s right because you have a moral duty.

    Read More

  • Deontological Theory Of Ethics In Sports

    1477 Words  | 6 Pages

    Deontology is defined as an ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of the action. Case in point, the physician who cleared the quarterback to play thought more about the consequences of his decision (the team winning) than what was in the best interest of the player (his duty as a physician). He was clearly in the wrong and in my opinion, he made an unethical decision. According to the International Federation of Sports Medicine ethics code, the team physician has the “responsibility […] to determine whether the injured athletes should continue training or participate in competition”.

    Read More

  • Non Deontological Ethics In Policing

    1042 Words  | 5 Pages

    Hence, a police officer’s duty then is to do the right act as approved by moral standards. Therefore, deontological ethics are duty based. Non-consequentialist ethics are divided into two standpoints; act non-consequentialism and rule non-consequentialism. Act non-consequentialism or intuitionism is described as the act of following one’s intuition in order to determine the morality in a particular situation. However, rule non-consequentialism explains that people should follow the rules that are the basis of morality where the consequences are given less importance.

    Read More

  • Critical Thinking And Ethics In The Public Sector Course At Southern Utah University

    750 Words  | 3 Pages

    For instance, one would not lie no matter the situation or consequence. In addition, if the consequence was bad, then it would not be the moral agent’s fault for what someone else does. In contrast, this strength can also be a weakness. An argument against deontology consists of a thought experiment about lying. If a person that desires to kill your brother knocks on your door and asks if your brother is inside.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism In Nursing Ethics

    1374 Words  | 6 Pages

    Deontology and Utilitarianism are similar in that the tenets of each aims at promoting the well-being of others by doing good. However, there are several differences between Deontology and Utilitarianism. Deontology focuses on the moral intention of an act.

    Read More

  • Essay On Divine Command Theory

    1218 Words  | 5 Pages

    The divine command theory, utilitarianism, Kant’s duty defined morality, natural law theory, and Aristotle’s virtue ethics are the five types of ethical theories. The divine command theory states that what is morally right and wrong will be decided by God. Utilitarianism states that “Action “A” is morally right if and only if it produces the greatest amount of overall happiness. Kant’s duty defined morality states that what is important is acting for the sake of producing good consequences, no matter what the act is. Natural law theory states that people should focus on the good and avoid any evil.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Deontological Ethics

    1536 Words  | 7 Pages

    The distinction between right and wrong has been a matter of discussion for centuries, whether expressed through philosophical essays, social organisation or artistic creation. Deontological ethics is a philosophical theory which dissects acts into right and wrong on the basis of the adherence of an act to a specific rule. One of the many formulations of deontology is Kantianism, a view introduced by Immanuel Kant, which argues that the basis for morality are motives for one’s action rather than the consequences of it and searches a justification for one’s duty to behave in a certain manner. One of the critiques or counter positions of Kant’s ethics is Sartrean existentialism as it denies the possibility of an absolute moral system and focuses on the individual morality rather than social one and bases on one’s commitment to his chosen values. Yet drawing parallels between the two positions is far from impossible, despite Sartre’s strong opposition to Kantian moral theory.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Deontology In Nursing

    338 Words  | 2 Pages

    Margarita Rodriguez Philosophy of Nursing Millers College of Nursing October 16, 2015 How does deontology relate to an individual nurse?s professional practice of nursing? According to the American Nurses Association, Deontology, an ethical theory founded by Immanuel Kant, applies judgments based on the underlying morality, or the rightness or wrongness of an action. It is based upon adherence to rules.

    Read More

  • Kant's Ethics Vs. Utilitarian Ethics

    1023 Words  | 5 Pages

    The theory of deontology states we are morally obligated to act in accordance with obvious set of principles and rules regardless of results. Deontological ethics focuses on duties, and rights. The term deontological was coined by the utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham, who described it as “knowledge of what is right or proper” Bentham thought that deontology points in the direction of principle of utility. But contemporary philosophers use the term deontological to indicate a contrast with the utilitarian focus on the consequences of action. Instead of focusing on consequences, deontological ethics focus on duties and obligation: things we ought to do regardless of the consequences.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Deontology

Open Document