ipl-logo

Essay On Kantian Deontology

724 Words3 Pages

One objection to Kantian deontology is that it does not propose a solution where two absolute duties conflict with each other. As previously stated, according to Kant, duties are absolute moral rules and the objective morality grounds on this feature of duties. However, this absolutism leads to possible conflict of duties and Kantian deontology does not provide a form for this kind of situations. For instance, I borrow a pocket knife from my friend and I promise to give it back when she wants back. Next day, when we are together in our neighbor, a guy swears to my friend and she gets really angry. She wants the pocket knife to hurt him and I know that she can really do it. I should keep my promise and give the pocket knife but also I should not help her to hurt somebody. These are different duties but I have to obey the command of each duty. Since they are unconditional and absolute, they cannot both be followed. It is possible to give many similar real life examples where duties are in conflict. How can we decide one duty is more important than another? It is not possible to give a consequentialist account of duty for the Kantian deontology. Therefore, Kantian ethics can be impractical in special kind of scenarios. One …show more content…

Kant himself claims that it is not right to hurt animals. The reason behind this claim is that he believes that hurting animals indirectly infringing the moral duties to rational beings. For example, raping a cat damages the person who performs that action and it affects his or her attitudes toward rational beings. “... so far as animals are concerned, we have no direct duties. ... Our duties towards animals are merely indirect duties towards humanity." However, in my opinion, this respond cannot be a proper respond to the objection because it still does not give a sufficient importance to non-rational

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Why Abortion Is Immoral By Don Marquis

    1384 Words  | 6 Pages

    Essay On Why Abortion Is Immoral This article called “Why Abortion Is Immoral” written by Don Marquis argues and why abortion is prima facie impermissible. Marquis accesses both anti-abortion arguments and also pro-choicer’s claim to protect the legalization of abortion. My paper is going to understand and examine the the both sides arguments, and to attempt to recognize abortion is immoral.

    Read More

  • What Is The Central Message Of The Seventh Of March Speech

    1391 Words  | 6 Pages

    One

    Read More

  • Comparing Kant's Categorical Imperative And John Stuart Mill

    507 Words  | 3 Pages

    Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative and John Stuart Mill’s view of utilitarianism are two very different approaches to ethics and morals. In fact, they are the opposite of one another. Kant’s view of ethics is an ethics of pure reason- a deontological theory of ethics. He stresses that feelings and emotions should have no part in ethics because they are unreliable, changeable, and uncertain. He states that ethical principles must be universal and that ethics are distinctively human.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Deontology

    1202 Words  | 5 Pages

    To begin with, this theory relies on moral absolutes which can be defined as actions that are entirely right or entirely wrong. Deontologists cannot consider the consequences of their actions, even if the consequences of a particular action bring about more harm than the act itself. Deontology theory says that certain types of actions are either absolutely right or wrong, but provides no way in which to distinguish which action may be right or wrong and thus duties and principles can conflict (Preston, 2007). For instance,

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Deontology And Mill's Utilitarianism

    1380 Words  | 6 Pages

    However, even though these are two opposing philosophies, with very different ideas governing their conclusions, we should look to learn from both and apply the knowledge we identify with, thus creating our own philosophies. In this essay I wish to do exactly that; to compare and contrast these two ideologies in order to better understand them and help others do the same. First we must understand what is Deontology. The word deontology when broken down to its roots literally means, the study of the nature of duty and obligation.

    Read More

  • Kant's Ethics: Jim Doesn T Kill The Indian Man

    1207 Words  | 5 Pages

    As a Kantian, the ultimate goal is to focus on our maxims and not on how much pain or pleasure the act could possibly produce. So as a result, Kant would argue that Jim should not kill the Indian man, even if it would save the other Indian men. The reason why is because Kant does not believe in using people as mere means, it wouldn’t be considered a conceivable maxim, and it would be betraying a perfect duty. The definition of deontology is having the belief that you do what’s right because you have a moral duty.

    Read More

  • Cruelty In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

    678 Words  | 3 Pages

    Do you think people are simply cruel or do they have a reasoning to be cruel? In the book of Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, many characters show a cruel side of them that was a bit misunderstanding but had their own personal reasons why they acted cruel. The novel Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, with a very intense storyline is about two best friends named Lennie Small and George Milton who are always on the road looking for work on farms, since they’re planning to own their own farm someday. When luck hits them and find work at a ranch they meet many people at the ranch but everyone doesn’t get along. Sadly in the end when George finds out they wanted to kill Lennie, George ended up killing Lennie himself.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism In Nursing Ethics

    1374 Words  | 6 Pages

    Deontology and Utilitarianism are similar in that the tenets of each aims at promoting the well-being of others by doing good. However, there are several differences between Deontology and Utilitarianism. Deontology focuses on the moral intention of an act.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism

    1228 Words  | 5 Pages

    Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are two of the most notable philosophers in normative ethics. This branch of ethics is based on moral standards that determine what is considered morally right and wrong. This paper will focus on Immanuel Kant’s theory of deontology and J.S. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism. While Mill takes a consequentialist approach, focused on the belief that actions are right if they are for the benefit of a majority, Kant is solely concerned with the nature of duty and obligation, regardless of the outcome. This paper will also reveal that Kantian ethics, in my opinion, is a better moral law to follow compared to the utilitarian position.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Animal Euthanasia

    1326 Words  | 6 Pages

    Abstract Human life is precious, then how about animals? Ending human life is considered as unethical and this is against the law. However, this does not apply to animals. Even though most families treat their animals as part of their family members, animal euthanasia is still a controversial issue nowadays. Millions of dogs are euthanized in each year and several methods are used by the veterinarian to put the animal to death.

    Read More

  • Deontology Vs Utilitarianism Essay

    431 Words  | 2 Pages

    Introduction In this essay, I will be comparing Deontology to Utilitarianism. I will attempt to substantiate why I am justified in arguing that Deontology is a superior moral theory than Utilitarianism. A Discussion of the Main Elements of Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a moral theory developed by English philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1947 – 1832) and refined by fellow countryman John Stuart Mill (1806 – 1873).

    Read More

  • Examples Of Deontology In Nursing

    338 Words  | 2 Pages

    Margarita Rodriguez Philosophy of Nursing Millers College of Nursing October 16, 2015 How does deontology relate to an individual nurse?s professional practice of nursing? According to the American Nurses Association, Deontology, an ethical theory founded by Immanuel Kant, applies judgments based on the underlying morality, or the rightness or wrongness of an action. It is based upon adherence to rules.

    Read More

  • Kant's Formula Of Universal Law

    1969 Words  | 8 Pages

    First, I will explain the Formula of Universal Law and focus on the ethical position of duty belonging to Kant’s deontological ethics. Next, I’ll present Kant’s lying promise case and will analyze his explanation of it being immoral through the Formula of Universal Law. Finally, I’ll end by stating my disagreement with Kant’s

    Read More

  • Kant's Ethics Vs. Utilitarian Ethics

    1023 Words  | 5 Pages

    The theory of deontology states we are morally obligated to act in accordance with obvious set of principles and rules regardless of results. Deontological ethics focuses on duties, and rights. The term deontological was coined by the utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham, who described it as “knowledge of what is right or proper” Bentham thought that deontology points in the direction of principle of utility. But contemporary philosophers use the term deontological to indicate a contrast with the utilitarian focus on the consequences of action. Instead of focusing on consequences, deontological ethics focus on duties and obligation: things we ought to do regardless of the consequences.

    Read More

  • Write An Essay On Kant's Deontologism

    799 Words  | 4 Pages

    Deontology is an ethical or moral duty, commitment, or obligation that is sometimes guided by the rule which binds every individual to discharge and contributes to self, others, and the society. It is the study of nature and a call to responsibility. In the metaphysics of what is morally wrong or right, I think Kant fails to recognize what is morally good but the consequences that termed it wrong may exhibit benefit that is greater. Relating this to organ transplant, would we think it is morally good to terminate one life to save others? Ethically, weighing the benefit to the life expectancy of the recipient can be considered good but will be wrong in Kant’s deontologism.

    Read More

More about Essay On Kantian Deontology

Open Document