ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

616 Words3 Pages

There are countless Arguments both for and against the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. Some of the main arguments of the Federalist include that a strong National government offered protection for the people’s rights, the government would benefit from a 3 branch system and a system of checks and balances needed to be created. Some of the main ideas of the anti-federalist were that the National Government would have too much power, a Bill of Right needed to be added, the constitutions effect of the government would be too tyrannical, and that the federal court system would be too powerful. Considered the Father of the Constitution, James Madison was detrimental in the creation
In the US Constitution. He was a major part of the Federalist party. Historylearningsite defines Federalism as “a system of government in which a written constitution divides power between a central government and regional or sub-divisional governments. Both types of government act directly upon the people through their officials and laws.”Federalism” History Learning Site, http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/american-politics/federalism/ Madison argued that a strong national government offered protection for the peoples rights. In a time and age when the main system of government i.e. The articles of confederation were failing the people …show more content…

It was argued in favor of the constitution that should the National Government be separated into 3 branches it would limit the instance in which one part of the government would overpower another. This let the citizens know that the new proposed government would be fair, a major concern in pre constitution times. Another argument in favor of the Constitution was the fact that each branch of proposed government would be able to check or limit other branches. So they made a claim and backed it up with a system to ensure that it would be

Show More
Related

  • Primary Arguments Against Ratifying The Constitution Pros And Cons

    210 Words  | 1 Pages

    The primary argument against ratifying the constitution by the Anti-Federalists was that they imagined that the administration would be made would be too effective and they would simply be making ready for another government like the one that they had quite recently contended so energetically to free themselves from England. They likewise needed to include a Bill of Rights before endorsing the constitution and not afterward. The Pros are that the report had expressed to give trust against the unfeeling and unlawful demonstration of decision the american colonies. Freedom of development which is under Article IV. This area said the security and interminable associations and organization among the natives of the rose country.

    Read More

  • Objections To The Constitution Pros And Cons

    322 Words  | 2 Pages

    1. The Constitution originally lacked a Bill of Rights. George Mason from Virginia presented a proposal to add a bill of rights to the document. But his offer was voted down.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

    744 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lora Reed Ontiveros P. Sci 180 01 July, 2017 The Constitutional Convention In February of 1787, Congress decided that a convention should assemble to amend the Articles of Confederation. The Constitutional Convention was held by a small body of well-respected delegates in the Assembly Room of Independence Hall in Philadelphia, to inaugurate a new union. This convention ultimately impelled three crucial proposals, the Virginia and New Jersey Plan, and the Connecticut Compromise, which led to the nation’s fist Constitution.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    770 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander Hamiliton stated “Seperation of powers in any case does anything to protect populations in democracies from tyranny”. The Articles of Confederation gave states more power than the national,central,federal government. This then bought the idea of federalism which divides powers between the federal government and the state government. The framers were scared to give the national government power which called for the separation of powers which gives each branch their own duties. Creating checks and balances to stop any branch from taking on full

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    661 Words  | 3 Pages

    After the ratification of the Articles of Confederation in 1781, a sense of nationalism and unity swept across the young United States of America. Unfortunately, with youth, comes inexperience. It did not take long for numerous problems to be noticed under the Articles including a weak central government, no national judicial system, and little coined money. Due to the controversy and disorder arisen by the Articles of Confederation, the delegates of the United States joined for the 2nd Constitutional Convention in 1787 to make reparations. The top scholars of the nation intended to repair the existing government but instead, created a whole new one.

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

    1511 Words  | 7 Pages

    Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

    Read More

  • Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

    705 Words  | 3 Pages

    At the Constitutional Convention, our founding fathers met to reconstruct the Articles of Confederation, not knowing that they would create the United States Constitution, an entire new format of government. They wanted to create a government that was powerful yet restricted in certain ways, in order to create equal representation for all people. Three main compromises were made at the Constitutional Convention. These compromises were The Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise, and the addition of the Bill of Rights.

    Read More

  • Constitution Vs Constitution Dbq Essay

    758 Words  | 4 Pages

    America has been shaped in many different ways, but one of the most important is the way the country is governed. Once the Revolutionary War was over, the United States of America needed to figure out a new way to govern their country because when the states had more power than the national government, the country was weak. The Framers of the United States Constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the Federal Government rather than the state government because the Articles of Confederation were weak, the Constitution was strong, and the Constitution was more likely to succeed than the Articles. The Articles of Confederation were used to govern America during the Revolutionary War.

    Read More

  • The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists

    99 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

    Read More

  • The Federalist No. 10 Argument

    978 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Federalist No. 10” is a persuasive argument written by James Madison in an attempt to ratify the Constitution. He wrote a series of documents called the Federalist Papers under a pseudonym to convince others to approve of the Constitution. He says that factions are not good for America, neither is a pure democracy. Madison provides extensive arguments and remedies for the problems he is addressing. James Madison is attempting to ratify the Constitution by analyzing the way to deal with factions, comparing a republic to a democracy, and by comparing a small government to a large government.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitution Of 1787

    1512 Words  | 7 Pages

    Constitution 1The Constitution of the United States(1787)The development that prompted to the written work of the 1787constitution became out of disappointment with thefunctioning of the Articles of Confederation. Asearly as 1781, there were proposition to amendthe Articles. The key issue was that theCongress had no free saddling power, andwas reliant on the states for commitments itrequested from them. More than once from 1781 to1786 proposition were made for restricted taxingpower, typically a little altered obligation on importedgoods, yet every one foundered on the necessityof getting consistent sanction of all thestates. By 1786, Congress was largelyparalysized.

    Read More

  • Robert Yates Anti Federalist 17 Summary

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government an excessive amount of power, and while not a Bill of Rights the folks would be in danger of oppression. Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution did not want a Bill of Rights, that it might produce a "parchment barrier" that restricted the rights of the folks, as critical protective

    Read More

  • A Strong Central Government Pros And Cons Essay

    507 Words  | 3 Pages

    Madison represented the party known as the Federalists. He was an elitist who believed that the most fit to rule would rise into the national

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitution

    316 Words  | 2 Pages

    "1. Since we are in the special position, we have to have a ruler, that is why we appointed a governor Josip Jelačić Buzinski of the Triune kingdom, the husband of our people, which governs the army and gathers the Assembly. 2. The state Parliament should be always gathered till the 1st of May this year in Zagreb 3. The new union in every sense of the law comprises the kingdom of Dalmatia together with kingdoms of Croatia and Slavonia, as well as military borders, and evertyhing lost in Hungary and Austria.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

Open Document