Pros And Cons Of The Gatesburggreen Initiative

Before1954, human behavior could have segregated public education through two methods: de facto and state mandated. The former arose from residential patterns and local school policy; the latter had roots in innate discrimination based on racial classifications. “Some have suggested that the de jure-de facto distinction is wholly artificial. If only the facts were known, they argue, any long-continued racial imbalance would be found the product of purposeful segregation policy and school authorities” (Goodman 1). This argument proved correct, and desegregation efforts shifted to the constitutionality of laws. Therefore, in 1954, the Supreme Court held in Brown v. Board of Education that state-imposed racial segregation in public institutions violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. While Brown has come to be regarded as a civil rights milestone, the court’s actions also had negative effects on the black people it intended to help.

In this essay I will be explaining the pros and cons of each plan then explaining which one is better. In the Wade-Davis bill the cons were: Having to Pledge to the union and Only white males who didn 't fight could vote,President Lincoln did not like this plan but Wade Davis made President Lincoln realize he would have to compromise. The Wade Davis bill also made it hard for people to vote so they started looking at the 10% plan. In the 10% plan the pros were : Only 10% of voters had to pledge allegiance to the union , there would be a new constitution to ban slavery and offered amnesty to the southerners or official pardon for illegal acts supporting the rebellion. The cons were: you had to swear an oath to the U.S and had to agree that slavery was wrong , most people agreed that the 10% plan didn 't go far enough and the amnesty did not apply to confederate leaders.

What we need to do is recycle more. We need to keep our world clean and not full of trash. Some people just think it is alright to throw their garbage out the window of their car and think that nothing will happen. Well, that 's not true! Animals that see it think of it as food and once they get into it they may get stuck or get cut on the thing that you threw out.

John Tierney’s piece is very interesting. It goes against I and many other people have been taught when it comes to recycling. As I read his article I kept saying to myself, oh wow, I never taught of that or that is an interesting perspective. When it comes to the environment I am not someone who keeps up with it so I know that (or taught) recycling is good, carbon emissions are bad, don’t litter, and so on. So, reading this, I don’t really have facts that may counteract what he said so in my case I will most likely take his word as fact more than other people would. The really shocking point was actually the last sentence when he stated: “How can you build a sustainable city with a strategy that can’t even sustain itself?”. I was very surprised reading that because we think of recycling as being sustainable. But when it comes to Tierney he believes that we have to get a carbon tax so that it is more expensive to put garbage in landfills and subsidize recycling. That is a very interesting point that he makes.

Q1. Explain the differences between the private sector, the public sector and the voluntary sector. (1.1)

It is a duty of each citizen to preserve the city and it is not excusable to throw away garbage on the streets, however, a few measures could serve as friendly reminders of a person’s obligation. There is a lack of garbage bins in the park and on the sidewalks and this could be one of the reasons of why people are disrespecting the environment. If there is plenty of places to dispose the garbage properly,

This year has been really hectic, with protests and elections alike. Something that had to do with the protests part is the Dakota Access Pipeline, or DAPL. Most people would probably think that the Dakota Access Pipeline is just another pipeline, like the Alaska pipeline, except, it's not just another pipeline. The reason why DAPL is important is because of the fact that it is running over ancient indian land, and not only that it is going over their water source.The clean water the Sioux once had could be gone in just a few months with DAPL going over the standing rock’s water (Michael Bennet). That’s not all because the drinking water downstream from DAPL could be affected too, and next thing you know hundreds of thousands of people will

The JJDP Act was created to protect juveniles, however, each state has the right to establish the age limit that they considered an adult. Essentially, each state can have their own legal defined age limit for when an individual is no longer considered a juvenile. Most states in the U.S has seventeen as the age when a person is considered an adult under the law. However, Georgia, Texas and few other states have the juvenile cut off age at sixteen and in past times, other states had it as low as fifteen (Tiegen, 2017). Inherently, this means that a young man or woman can’t be taken from family or juvenile court to adult court and taken through the same due process as an adult at the tender age of fifteen. Experts have argued that a fifteen or sixteen-year-old young boy or girl is not as developed in their thinking or actions as an adult. An individual at the age of adolescents will not behave or think in the same way that someone in the middle adulthood stage of life will think. Defining who is a juvenile based on age has its

Doctor Michelle Stanford, was served as the chief resident at Children’s Hospital in Denver among many other accolades. Dr. Stanford, states it undermines the integrity of the medical profession; she goes on to quote the American Medical Association “Allowing physicians to participate would cause more harm than good, physicians assisted suicide is fundamentally incompatible with the physician’s as healer would difficult or impossible and would pose serial societal risks.” (Prop 106 - Dr. Michelle Stanford).

Imagine living in a world where the air is polluted and most people are afraid to step outside their front door, in the near future, this may be reality for Americans. Americans throw out over 200 million tons of garbage a year, yet recycle not nearly as much. Most people do not realize it but recycling is a vital part of America’s society and if Americans do not perform this action, it will backfire on them. People in America are debating whether Americans are recycling enough and correctly. After analyzing the data, one will definitely agree that Americans need to be more educated on recycling due to the fact that most people do not know what happens after they recycle an item, nearly all Americans are recycling incorrectly, and Am

Recycling is a great idea for it 's a way to make the environment a better place, im a pro for the no recycling laws for Gatesburg. If the law passed it would criminalize violations of its complicated rules. Why would we want someone to tell us how to live our life or having to be worried about being fined for putting an item in the wrong bin. Yet they want to increase out taxes to pay for the services they think is right. This law proposal requires a radio-freguency identification computer chips to the recycling bins is an invasion of our privacy, it tracks the pounds we throw in there every day and if its over the normal amount summons the trash police to check to see if we threw a recycle item in the trash barrel? Why would we pay more to

II. Statement of Significance: Recycling is critical currently if we need to leave this planet for our who and what is to come. It is useful for nature, since we are making new items from the old items which are of no utilization to us. Recycling starts at home. On the off chance that you are not discarding any of your old item and rather using it for something new, at that point you are recycling. When you consider reusing you should consider the entire thought; reduce, reuse and recycle. We 've been indiscreet so far with the way we 've treated the Earth and it 's an ideal opportunity to change; not only the way we get things done but rather the way we think.

To begin, one way plastic bags should be banned is because they cause too much litter. For example, the International Coastal Cleanup in California has collected 7,825,319 plastic bags during the past twenty-five years (1). This shows

To begin with, people should recycle because it protects our living area, Earth. First, recycling can cut down pollution. If people recycle, there would be fewer chances of recyclables being burned, tossed in or near the ocean, parks, natural animal habitats, gutters, and schools. Recyclables being burned create air toxins that harm the natural

“Sustainable agriculture is the efficient production of safe high quality agricultural products, in a way that protects and improves the natural environment the social and economic conditions of farmers their employees and local communities and safe guard the health and welfare of all farmed species“