Argumentative Essay On Recycling In The United States

More than 300 buildings were burned down, and nearly one billion dollars worth in property damage. The riots were started because people were outraged that the police officers were not prosecuted for killing Rodney King. The people only wanted justice for Rodney King, all of this could have been prevented if the justice system did its job and cops were not brutalizing innocent American

There are millions of undocumented immigrants living in the U.S.A., it would be almost impossible to deport every single one of them. The cost of deporting them would be super large and it would almost be a waste of money. People are overlooking all the benefits that illegal immigrants have and are worrying too much about the small number of criminal immigrants

Gun lobbying and industry have horrible campaigns which draw more Americans to buy a gun. So this help them with their profit but puts danger on society around them due to poor decisions. Areas that have high rate for gun sales does not care who has gun because all they worry about is the profit coming into their store every time they sell something. Gun safety is big issue that needs to be consider in areas with high death toll because that where most of use of negligence with guns is happening. Firearms are main cause for crimes and death ,which makes it big cause for control within areas that feel about the poorly use of materials.

If I say that we all are irrational, some of you might defend me say that not all are irrational. But I can prove that all of us have unintentionally been an part of irrational decision making, like not wearing vehicle seat belt because you thought it might spoil your amazing outfit, smoking and drinking alcohol, poor financial decision (buying unnecessary items), not attending a lecture or class, and many more. In a survey conducted in Manhattan 50% of the people had purchased an umbrella for a very high price on rainy day from street vendor. Moreover, 77% of the people said they would purchase an umbrella for a high price on a rainy day if it were necessary. However, 90% of the people will not buy the same umbrella for even half the price if it was a sunny day (Summer, 2012).

This is what the USFG prevents from happening and is another reason as to why I do not believe that the USFG should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance! Also, why should we be so concerned about privacy if we have nothing to hide? Would you feel uncomfortable knowing your parents are watching you do the right thing and following directions? On the other side, I am sure you wouldn't want to be monitored if you were doing something questionable, so really, why worry about surveillance? In times like these, it seems as though surveillance should be enforced and enhanced, not "substantially curtailed", and that is why I think you shouldn't agree with the affirmative side of this

It is not intended for people to abuse it and spend it on illegal activities that can worsen their health and ruin the lives of other around them. People who give their money to welfare want to see the money be put to proper use. This task is nearly impossible while they’re drugs involved. Getting people out of bad habits/harmful activities should be a large goal for welfare. The idea of drug testing welfare recipients came from the idea of not wasting taxpayers money (Cunha).

Today, the biggest problem that our environments face is litter. The more we litter, the more it becomes a habit and it destroy our environment. Many people don’t care about their little mistake can affect their whole environment. Government spends lot of money just to clean up the litter that many people tossed out on the public areas without thinking how bad it is. If anyone thinks about the effects of litter, imaging how much money could be saved and used for more important services.

Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech. Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with

Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech. Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with

Profit and money are the driving factors behind so many things, that people are not very motivated to eradicate something that earns them billions of dollars. Yes, legislation such as those to reduce secondhand smoke positively affect health outcomes, but I feel it is not enough. Tobacco is a legal substance despite its known negative, sometimes fatal repercussions. There is a plethora of research regarding the deadly and harmful effects of smoking and cigarette use, yet it is a legal substance used by millions. I think that the government needs to forget the profit aspect and focus on its citizens health.

Larry is against drug testing for welfare recipients. Why? Welfare participants would have to pay for their tests out of their welfare money, and getting tested isn’t necessarily cheap. He claims that making them pay for their tests is criminalizing, when these people aren’t criminals. comparing welfare recipients to criminals doesn’t justify whether they should

However, many people do not believe her ideas and methods because not everyone can afford everything. Many people have to put a limit on their spendings and many have to keep an eye on sales and deals in the store to buy affordable things. Kondo’s methods forces people to tidying up things, but some may have memories with it or experiences. However, her methods are shown as if people own too much stuff and those things do not bring joy. Therefore, Kondo’s ideas make people to lose their contacts with their past and make people sad about nostalgia.

-Elephant Watch by Peter Canby If you walk into most households around the United States, most families and individuals would argue to you that recycling is very important. These people say this because they believe that what they are throwing out is valuable enough to pay for it to be recycled and turned into new items of value. However, the article Recycling Is Garbage claims that recycling these materials that have been deemed as valuable to be pointless. There is not necessarily a right or wrong answer, but if you choose to believe the resources that we throw away every day to be valuable, then your actions will be based on that principle. -Recycling Is Garbage by John

Many people were for taking the statue down and many against taking it down. The statue should be taken down seeing that as, the statues are an inaccurate representation of our past, many people don’t want to look in the past, and this statue didn’t honor the hero, but honored a killer instead. One reason that the statue needs to be taken down is that this statue is an inaccurate representation of our past. Many people also focus on the money and how much it would cost to maintain the statue. Estimating that the statue cost about $10,000 in 1884, which means it would be about $1 million in 2017.

They don’t believe that people should pay for paper products because how important they were back then. I mean how would people be able to communicate without being taxed. They would have to travel or send a letter. So you’re taxing people because they’re using paper products or sending a letter. Even know the money that is taxed it’s used for defending and guarding the American frontier.