ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Utilitarianism

287 Words2 Pages

When it comes to the philosopher that is mostly correct about the kinds of personal sacrifices that morality shouldn’t demand on us to make in the name of common good, it is Bernard Williams. He basically states that utilitarianism is too demanding upon us for the happiness of others, where we can’t even focus on the happiness of ourselves. Not only is a person responsible for the things they do in life, but they have to be responsible for the consequences of things that they don’t do in life that don’t bring the greatest happiness to everyone around them. Utilitarianism states that even if someone were to feel a negative way on a subject due to their values or morals, they should dismiss all personal feelings and emotions to promote general happiness. Williams disagrees and I as well disagree with that statement. Everyone should be able to express how they feel throughout life because those are most of our meaningful moments as human beings. …show more content…

Although, suffering and death are bad things, I don’t think a person should have to devote their entire life to having to solve those issues. Helping contribute to someone else’s struggle I agree with, but not to the extent that Singer expects us to. Fighting global poverty is going to take a lot more than just a person contributing enough of their money, until they contribute no more, but putting a correct system in place economically so poverty will be no

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Famine, Affluence And Morality By Peter Singer

    1654 Words  | 7 Pages

    I also agree with the fact that many people do step down from helping in any situation if they see someone give too much money, when they can only give a little embarrassing amount. Instead of that other person helping they are really damaging others from getting help. If everyone just gave or helped a little that would be enough for everyone else to see and to feel guilt for not stepping in and it would also cross out others stating that they do not have much to give; if in case everyone gave a reasonable amount that no one could not afford. For Singer it was about keeping your morals in place and that one ought to do what is known to be the right thing to do. To help in any way possible and in doing so the world would be very different and there would be less

    Read More

  • Singer Solution To Global Poverty Rhetorical Analysis

    1582 Words  | 7 Pages

    One of Singer’s main and most stressed points was that whenever one has extra, luxury, money, they should not spend it on themselves (new clothes, new car, vacation etc.), but should rather give every penny of it away to those less fortunate. “That 's right: I 'm saying that you shouldn 't buy that new car, take that cruise, redecorate the house or get that pricey new suit. After all, a $1,000 suit could save five children 's lives.” (Singer, 1999) I firmly believe that if you work hard for a wage, you are entitled to the right to spend that money on whatever you deem fit, be that donating to famine relief or buying your children new bikes.

    Read More

  • Importance Of Utilitarianism In Marketing To Children

    1312 Words  | 6 Pages

    It states that an action which is deemed right is one that has not merely some good consequences, but also the greatest amount of good consequences possible when the negative consequences are also given due considerations. According to the utilitarian principle, the righteousness of an action is solely judged on the basis of its consequences. Classical utilitarianism determines the balance of pleasure and pain for each individual affected by the action in question as well as the amount of utility for the whole

    Read More

  • Analysis: The Singer Solution To World Poverty

    794 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to the United Nations, a child dies of hunger every ten seconds. Likewise, millions of people live in poverty and do not know when they will eat again. While the typical American throws away leftover food, children are dying across the world from starvation. To put this into perspective: By the time you have started reading, a child has died of hunger. But who is to blame?

    Read More

  • Who Is Peter Singer Persuasive Essay

    1175 Words  | 5 Pages

    One claim against Singer’s argument for example would be, if I donated a portion of money to help people out in countries that are not as fortunate. How would me, this one particular person help make a big enough difference to help that vast number of people that are suffering out. Even if I gave a lot of money, goods, or materials one person can’t help billions of anguished people out. Although you would hope people would follow in suit with those actions, one can’t guarantee that people will pay it forward with good intentions. However just because other people aren’t going to help the deprived people, doesn’t mean one shouldn’t assist them.

    Read More

  • Singer On Poverty In America

    612 Words  | 3 Pages

    As he included, “if it is in our power to prevent something very bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything morally significant, we ought, morally to do it”(Singer 332). As you said, yes people should help others, but they shouldn’t put themselves in tough situation or “break the bank” trying to help someone else. Also, Singer stated, “The charitable man may be praised, but the man who is not charitable is not condemned” (Singer 334). I think he meant that, it can be the right thing to do to help someone in poverty, but it is not always wrong if you cannot help them. I agree with your opinion that people want to spend money on things that make them happy.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism Evaluation Paper

    611 Words  | 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism is one of the best-known theory under the consequentialism, and its idea is the Greatest Happiness Principle(GHP). According to the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “Utilitarian believe that the purpose of morality is to

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Consequentialism

    964 Words  | 4 Pages

    Answer 2: 1) Consequentialism, it says that an action can be judged as ethical or unethical based on the consequences it creates, practices which bring in a person cannot predict consequences beforehand, an art which could be gained with experience. Consequentialism has its types to evaluate morality, here it is by the human practices based on their act, the rules, the motives behind a specific practice and the character traits of a person who decides. Classic Utilitarianism is regarded as a generally accepted version of consequentialism. An action is considered moral based on the Utility, which is personal satisfaction, commonly stated as “happiness” minus the pain. Thus, an action is morally good or bad is based upon the rise and fall

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty By Peter Singer

    1234 Words  | 5 Pages

    Millions of people are hungry and thousands of individuals die of starvation each day. Meanwhile, the average American spends a portion of their income on luxuries, such as televisions to imported cars. In the article, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” Peter Singer stresses that Americans should donate all of their income that is not needed for necessities to overseas charities and aid organizations in order to resolve world poverty. However, his straightforward proposition to end world poverty lays on a controversial topic that questions one’s morals and rights.

    Read More

  • Peter Singer Rhetorical Analysis

    719 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are several pros to Singer’s belief. One of these is that this idea appeals to morals. To give up luxuries for the good of overs

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty

    576 Words  | 3 Pages

    Singer attempts to close this gap with the age old question of ‘why don’t we give the riches’ money to the poor’. The essence of Singer’s argument is obviously end world poverty. Probably the strongest point made in Singer’s argument is the involvement of the whole world. By taking this money from those across the world eliminates the opportunity for indifference. To stand with indifference is to stand with the oppressor.

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill On Happiness Essay

    852 Words  | 4 Pages

    A man by the name of John Stuart Mill seems to be able to give us some answers to these questions. Mill starts our inquiring journey with defining what utilitarianism stands for. In short he states that it is the construction of utility, which claims that the actions that stimulate happiness in is morally fit and vice versa to be unfit. Happiness is something that we want for

    Read More

  • Peter Singer Solution To World Poverty Analysis

    976 Words  | 4 Pages

    Singer’s Solution Good or Not? Who wouldn’t want to find a solution to end or reduce poverty in the world? A utilitarian philosopher, Peter Singer stated his own solution in his essay called “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”. Singer’s solution is simple: people shouldn’t be spend their money on luxuries, instead they should donate their money to overseas aid organizations. Peter uses two characters in his essay in hope to get to the hearts and minds of the people, and encourage them to donate.

    Read More

  • Essay On Divine Command Theory

    1218 Words  | 5 Pages

    The main principle of utilitarianism is happiness. People who follow this theory strive to fulfill the “ultimate good”. The “ultimate good” is defined as ultimate pleasure with out any pain. It is said that the pleasure can be of any quantity and any quality, but pleasures that are weighted more important are put at a higher level than others that are below it. This ethical theory also states that if society would fully embrace utilitarianism then people would naturally realize their moral standing in the

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Active Euthanasia?

    1188 Words  | 5 Pages

    Steven Hawking, the British physicist asked “We don't let animals suffer, so why humans?” The controversial issues of euthanasia started from 5th Century BC. The Hippocratic Oath prohibited physicians give a lethal drug to anyone, not even if asked for. However, most ancient Greek or Roman physicians ignored. They supported for voluntary euthanasia as opposed to prolonged pain.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Utilitarianism

Open Document