Introduction The concepts of intellectual freedom and privacy are interwoven in public libraries and the information services they provide. Library users cannot take advantage of their intellectual freedom when their interests and other personal information is potentially being tracked and monitored. Recent confidentiality and privacy legislation has impacted the development, delivery, and management of information services. Because of these impacts, libraries may have to find compromise between offering the most valuable services possible while prioritizing users' privacy in order to survive in an age of digital technology and exposure.
Confidentiality and Privacy Legislation Public libraries have had a long history of defending the privacy rights of library users, especially from government agencies. There have been numerous attempts of government agencies to obtain users' library information (Bowers,
…show more content…
The majority of information service tools are purchased through vendors (Pekala, 2017, p. 49). They have become a significant part of libraries, especially in the digital age, and almost every information service system or tool is now provided through a vendor. Magi (2010, p. 267) found that "the privacy policies of major vendors...fail to express a commitment to many of the standards articulated by the librarian profession and information technology industry for the handling and protection of user information." This is significant and illustrates how library users' information and privacy could easily be at risk. Libraries may not offer sufficient user information to government agencies, but those agencies can still access it through library vendors. Public libraries manage information services by holding vendors to a higher privacy standard and not purchasing their tools when their privacy policies are
Because technology is continually growing, new laws are being passed regarding technology and confidentiality. This article questions the “invasive” internet searches and looks for a constitutional answer. As of now, no electronic device can be confiscated and searched without a warrant. This could prove to be beneficial for Arnie. If he was to report Mr. Bowen’s suspicious data to the police, they would be able to obtain a warrant to officially search Mr. Bowen’s computer.
The author only uses testimonies of people in authority and their personal experience on dealing with the digital surveillance that the e-book producers conduct. “We think of it as the collective intelligence of all the people reading on Kindle," says Amazon spokeswoman Kinley Pearsall” (Alter, n.pag.). Apart from experts’ testimonies and statistical data, the fact that the text is published in a reputable media source, the Wall Street Journal, adds a lot of credibility to the information presented in the article. Since the Wall Street Journal is considered to be authoritative in a variety of areas, a reader would tend trust the testimonies and research published in the article. Otherwise, the quotes that the author attributes to some prominent figures and powerful corporations as Google, Amazon, Barnes & Noble, etc. would have been noticed if they were falsified.
Choose to use apps and services that notify you, in plain language, what information they collect and why”. Trapani presents the problem and offers a solution for readers. Like Felten she shows that there is a problem but also helps the reader by giving them an answer. The common reader will not be able to make changes in the application making process, which Trapani knows, but they can be aware of the danger and look to avoid putting themselves in situations where they lose privacy. Her argument is clear and simple, which is perfect for the common app user who may not be an expert.
The rise of Google and other platforms forces people everywhere to wonder what's more important: protection of information through censorship, or the freedom
In a TIMES magazine article Banned Books: A School Librarian’s Perspective, written by Sharon Coatney, a librarian, Coatney, talks about her past experience with censorship while she worked at a small rural high school. Coatney says that “censorship or banning isn’t a new concept for any library, all of which have certain policies that have to be adhered to while selecting books for their collection” (Coatney, 2000). During her time at the high school, she says that the school’s library was practically a metal box that was locked for security reasons. Part of Coatney’s job as a librarian required her to keep all viewpoints balanced and to know what to do when an individual parent requests that a book from their ‘library’ be banned. “The removal of books didn’t take place often, but when it did it was because the book didn’t meet the criteria of the library policies instituted by the administration” (Coatney, 2000).
Nowadays, “privacy” is becoming a popular conversation topic. Many people believe that if they do not do anything wrong in the face of technology and security, then they have nothing to hide. Professor Daniel J. Solove of George Washington University Law School, an internationally known expert in privacy law, wrote the article Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’, published in The Chronicle of Higher Education in May of 2011. Solove explains what privacy is and the value of privacy, and he insists that the ‘nothing to hide’ argument is wrong in this article. In the article, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’”, Daniel J. Solove uses ethos, pathos, and logos effectively by using strong sources, using
“Many are worried that stores would not keep the information private, that it could be stolen or sold.” (Peters 22). This shows that people are scared and that they don’t appreciate that their data could be made non-private. Some people might say that it’s not a big deal that store owners are just trying to become more successful by collecting data. But it’s not part of their business to collect our personal data.
1984 , a novel based upon a society where there is hardly any privacy. Big Brother has surveillance all over the place so he can keep eyes on every person in Oceania. George Orwell, the author of the novel states about how technology is used for surveillance purposes and getting into people 's personal lives. That is also how our society works as well and we are living in it. Imagine being watched all day and night.
The 1966 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) was drafted in response to demands from leaders in the press and key individuals within Congress for greater access to government information in order to strengthen accountability in its personnel practices, domestic and foreign intelligence gathering efforts, foreign policy decisions, and other activities. The FOIA serves as a mechanism for the public?s right to know which in effect threatens the government?s right to protect state secrets and other privileged information. As a result, the process of implementing, interpreting, and applying the FOIA over time has been shaped by these competing interests. This article begins with a brief history of the origins of the act, followed by a description
The best solution, in this case, would definitely be the first alternative. Using the Library Bill of Rights to argue against the fact that libraries should be exempt from this kind of ruling as it violates the librarians’ intellectual and academic freedom. Librarians similar to college professors in which they should be allowed the same amount of freedom to speak and publish in the areas of their expertise. Vigilance would be the Walker Public Library's best defense for protecting these rights. For starters, the library staff must uphold ALA’s statement, "resisting abuse of governmental power, and to support those against whom such governmental power has been employed”, as they plan to fight for getting their rights back.
1a) The internet is compared to provide an interpretation of the first amendment protection as it was not present at the time of passing protection laws as a communication medium to find a common ground because it has similarities and as well as differing natures, values, abuses and dangers to the library, television and public places which the law treats differently. Libraries: It requires the libraries to enable the filter to Internet access for adults as well as children if they want to receive funds for Internet hookups.
The “Nothing-to-Hide Argument” Analyzed: In this rhetorical analysis, I will be taking a look at Daniel J. Solove’s essay “The Nothing-to-Hide Argument,” which is about privacy in the context of personal information and government data collection (Solove 734). Solove’s main argument in his essay is that the general public has a narrow perception of what privacy really is. The purpose behind his main argument is to expose the problems with the nothing-to-hide argument while presenting a way to challenge it for his target audience, government officials. Solove’s argument to his target audience is effective through his exemplary use of substance, organization, and style in his essay.
This completely takes away a person’s right to privacy. The government has access search anyone’s internet or library records. Taking away someone’s right to read what they please also takes away the freedom of writing about controversial topics since anyone who reads it is intimidated by the government (Jacobs and
They cannot be trusted to responsibly handle sensitive data when they lack respect for the law and lack respect for
Technology is growing at a fast pace and every day we see a new product or service that is available. Many times it is hard to even keep up with the latest phone, computer, game console, or software. There are so many different gadgets to choose from and even the internet is on information overload. As a result, we can no longer truly expect to have privacy.