Do we think about language when thinking about the origin of racism? We most likely don’t think about it since language and racism do not appear to be correlated. But aren’t they associated? Yes, they are associated in the sense that language itself can take the form of racism. It is essential to acknowledge that language is one of the most influential contributors to racism in order to see the correlation between them. Words have the power to create great things just like they have the power to destroy them. Claudia Rankine uses her book, Citizen: An American Lyric, to illustrate the idea that racism has become an everyday component of our society. This book expresses the idea that language normalizes the existence of racism. This particular …show more content…
The author was describing what people said about Williams when the following was stated: “She is a woman in love, one suggests. She has grown up, another decides, as if responding to the injustice of racism is childish and her previous demonstration of emotion was free-floating and detached from any external actions by others” (Page 35). The words used in the expression “she has grown up” imply that the racism experienced by Williams was not acknowledged as something out of the ordinary since the change in her actions was attributed to her level of maturity rather than to the acts of racism occurred. It is possible to determine that the person who said the expression was most likely a racist individual trying to cover the racism present in this context by placing Serena (obviously the victim) as the perpetuator and the perpetuators as irrelevant to the matter. It is crucial to pay close attention and notice that this is one of the few moments in which Rankine places her own emotion into her writing. Rankine, through her language, emits her anger toward those who said that responding against racism was “childish.” This shows Rankine’s awareness in regards to the normalization of racism and how she is clearly against
Despite her recurring emphasis on Native Americans in her reading, one must also realize how subjective her writings would be towards the white population. One must not forsake that she is white, which may lead her to feel inclined to have pity towards Native Americans, black Americans, and those of Hispanic
In “Slurring Perspectives,” Elisabeth Camp begins with the argument that slurs are “powerful” and “insidious” precisely because they “present contents from a certain perspective, which is difficult to dislodge despite the fact that it is precisely what a nonbigoted hearer most wants to resist.” It is this reason why slurs are considered more offensive than “pure expressives” like “damn,” because they denote certain negative properties which are meant to contain harmful, “truth-conditionally robust properties” (Camp 330). Camp then goes on to say that slurs “conventionally signal a speaker’s allegiance to a derogating perspective on the group identified by the slur’s extension-determining core” (Camp 331). It is this derogating perspective
This is shown when she says, “…racial caste system do no require racial hostility or overt bigotry to thrive. They need only racial indifference, as Martin Luther King Jr warned more than forty-five years ago.” (Alexander, 2010, p.14) As mentioned earlier, the one of the central themes of the book is racial aggression even though the “overt racial hostility” does not really exist in the Jim Crow era. People very easily believe in conventional information rather find out if the information is legitimate or not.
We are living in a world where the erasure and dehumanization of people of color is slowly becoming a normative. Voices silenced, struggles trivialized, deaths becoming statistics, brutality only brought up for shock factor, achievements hidden and it is all slowly becoming accepted. Through various rhetorical strategies Claudia Rankine illustrates the experience of being part of the marginalized identity in the United States and depicts how subtly and multifaceted the methods of oppression take place in the daily life are and the negative repercussions it holds on the individual. The ambiguity of her writing with the lack of punctuation and clarification of what is thought and what is aloud allows the readers to input their own interpretation of these various scenarios.
America Does Not Need to Censor Her Past I thought racism was a long-dead school of thought when we first began learning about Martin Luther King Jr. in the first grade; I remembering sharing this with my parents, and the dumbfounded look they had in response to my naïveté—or perhaps my stupidity. It took me another year to come around to the idea that racism was still alive and well in this country (after all, no one that I knew was being lynched or denied the right to vote): when I first heard “nigger” used to refer to Barack Obama by my grandmother’s neighbor in South Carolina—a place where prejudice runs deep and some believe the Civil War is still being fought nearly one hundred and fifty-five years later. Since then I must have heard “nigger” used hundreds of times as a term of endearment or as a vile insult; by my black friends or by my white classmates; in song lyrics or in everyday conversation; however, each time one thing remains the same: the immense power and history behind the most loaded word in the English language. “Nigger” is not interchangeable with the word slave; slave is not the invention of American racism and it does not
“She wanted her son to go there as well, but because of affirmative action or minority something...her son wasn’t accepted” (Rankine 13). This quote is interesting to me because it reminds of the case Grutter v. Bollinger, where a white female applicant to the University of Michigan Law School sued the school for violating her Fourteenth Amendment because they denied her admission. She lost in the end, but the ideology that minorities are more easily accepted into schools than whites is still thought and said by some white Americans today. The importance this quote serves to the poem is that the quote is another example of a microaggression that the author wants the reader to understand happens. “She says she grabbed the stranger’s arm and
While Rankine drives an academic associate home, “he tells [her] his dean is making him hire a person of color when there are so many writers out there” (10). Rankine contemplates this conversation’s purpose because she doesn’t know what she did to provoke this conversation. Her colleague’s complaint causes her extreme discomfort and shock, triggering her intentional silence. Unlike the previous microaggression, she chooses to be silent quicker. The silent response contains intent because she can’t run away from this microaggression since they are in that confined space.
Many people today seem to live life just as the instructor does, and they don't allow themselves to see people past their skin color. Others take up the traits of Mrs. Ericson as they simply watch racism and discrimination unfolding, only to do nothing to stop it. This short story is a reminder that to live a life of hatred is to live a life of blindness. The only way that racism can truly come to an end is if everyone does their part to stop it. If someone sees or hears something meant to demean a race or culture, then it is their duty to take action against it.
Racism is an issue in the book “The Hate U Give". Starr experiences the brutal realities of prejudice, sending her on an unfortunate journey. This essay talks about what kind of racism star dealt with. It is focussed on three important themes: stereotypes and prejudice, loss of identity, and systematic racism and injustices. I will show the significant impact of racism on Starr's life through these subjects.
Racism has long been present in society. Since the beginning there has always been the inferior and the superior. Marianne Williamson wrote an article call “Race and Repentance in America.” Throughout her article she took an absolutist standpoint, in which she clearly points out that racism was wrong, is wrong, and will always be wrong. She believes that something needs to be done to make up for what was done.
Rhetorical Reading Response Baldwin In James Baldwin's personal essay, "If Black English Isn't a Language, Then Tell me, What Is?" (1979), the author defines the development of language as primarily a political act through which a group of people establish a distinct identity. Baldwin shows this by giving examples of how language allows a group to define and express who they are from their own point of view, instead of having their reality expressed or misrepresented by another group. Baldwin's purpose for this essay is to defend, in an eloquent and convincing way, the idea that black English is a true language, in order to show that it meets the criteria of what defines a language as a method of expressing reality.
James and his mother are routinely denied access to resources and opportunities due to their race, a reality that shapes their experiences and prospects. When they finally make it to the dentist office, they find themselves in the middle of a conversation between a young man and a preacher. The conversation between the two serves as a powerful illustration of the impact of racism on James' growth and development. The young man and the preacher represent two very different approaches to the issue of racism. The young man is filled with anger and resentment against the injustices of the world and the white people who perpetuate them.
Based on this novel, the enforcement of racism will result in a lifetime of suffering. Rosaleen, the protagonist’s closest black friend, is negatively impacted by the experiences she encounters with three white nigger haters. As Rosaleen and Lily (main character of the novel) are entering the town of Sylvan, the three nigger haters begin judging Rosaleen due to her black appearances. Gradually, Rosaleen becomes more and more irritated with their insults.
Claudia Rankine a renown poet, uses her novel “Citizen: An American Lyric” to discuss issues of race and imagination. Claudia Rankine is an absolute master of poetry and uses her gripping accounts of racism, through poetry to share a deep message. Claudia Rankine uses poetry to correlate directly to accounts of racism making Citizen a profound experience to read. Not only is this poetic novel a vision of her world through her eyes, Rankine uses the experiences of Americans whose color has rendered them invisible to the many who are privileged enough to be blind and not note racism as a large issue in America. Claudia Rankine articulates the use of you and further emphasizes the larger meaning of the title Citizen and recognizing that word through societal issues.
It’s been 53 years since President Lyndon Johnson enforced the Civils Rights Act of 1964, but racism is still an ongoing issue to this day, whether it’s intentionally or inadvertently caused by the people in our society. Cornelius Eady evaluates the concept of racism through his poem, “The Cab Driver Who Ripped Me Off,” which focuses on the views of a prejudiced cab driver. Eady’s literary works focuses largely on the issue of racism within our society, centering on the trials that African Americans face in the United States. “The Cab Driver Who Ripped Me Off” from Autobiography of a Jukebox is an influential poem that successfully challenges the problems associated with racism, which is a touchy, yet prevalent problem that needs to be addressed.