Whites-Blacks relations The relationship between the two races is practically the basis of the civil rights movement. From their rhetoric, it is clear that Martin Luther King and Malcom X held quite different views on the current and future relationship of Blacks and Whites in the United States. Martin Luther King knew that Blacks are the minority in the US and that they “cannot walk alone”. They need allies in the white majority to be able to achieve any changes. He warns therefore the threat of gaining distrust of all white people. His vision for Blacks and White in the future was to live in peace as neighbors and friends. He assured not only Blacks and White allies, but also the opponents of desegregation that they will not stop fighting …show more content…
However, there are several notions and ideas they both used in their speeches. Both of them talk about the end of injustice and they create the sense of urgency. They claim that there is nothing to wait for and the right time is now. Malcolm X took it even further by claiming that the year 1964 will be critical. He says that there could be explosions because a lot of them are not willing to “turn the other cheek any longer”. He is demanding the civil rights when he says: "Give it to us now. Don't wait for next year. Give it to us yesterday, and that's not fast enough." In connection to that, they also used the notion of investment and to “cash a check of the past”. The years of slavery and suffering means that they are entitled of all the civil rights and justice. Again, Malcom X is adding more radical thoughts of how US became rich thanks to slavery and now is time to pay the Blacks back. Both of them also give the message of hope for better future. They believe that there will be change in the society, that they will achieve their goals, that there will be freedom and justice for Black
The white politicians would come into black neighborhoods and push, press, and force it upon blacks to put them in office. What X was trying to instill into the minds of his blacks was to be their own person. He wanted them to vote for who they felt was the right choice to benefit blacks. “ The
He enforces this idea in his speech by icing it an aggressive tone. On page 5 Malcolm X says “The Russian revolution was bloody, the Chinese revolution was bloody… and there was nothing more bloody than the American Revolution.” (Malcolm X). He shows in this quote that when people have wanted freedom throughout history the have had to fight for it and this revolution won’t be any different. He also gives his speech an aggressive tone, as shown in this quote, by calling America a hypocrite.
In the book, “Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and the Civil Rights Struggle of the 1950s and 1960s: A brief History with Documents” by David Howard-Pitney. The book portrays the two main figures during the Civil Rights Movement in the early to-mid 20th century. During this time, Malcolm X and MLK had different strategies in trying to achieve rights for African Americans. However, it would have been harder to achieve the Civil Rights movement without Malcolm X with his troubled childhood, his impactful speeches, and Islam religion.
Malcolm X is more adversarial towards the white community through his vivid descriptions of the brutal history of oppression black Americans face, in order to empower his audience to follow
Thesis statement: The two great leaders in the black community debating about the issues that face the Negro race and Du Bois gave a compelling argument by using pathos, logos and ethos to create an essay that will appear to all readers. Outline: This essay will showcase the contradicting philosophies between W.E.B Du Bois and Booker T. Washington. Also, paying close attention to the different types of leadership between the two historic leaders in the black community. Both W.E.B Du Bois and Booker T. Washington contributed to and helped shape the future of African Americans.
The element of time is referenced by X as justification for the violence, this is evident when he says, “Civil Rights, for those of us whose philosophy is Black nationalism means: 'Give it to us now. Don’t wait for next year. Give it to us yesterday, and that’s not fast enough. '” (Malcolm, 439). Already his tone is more aggressive than the early integrationists who birthed the movement.
Martin Luther King Jr., a minister and social activist, led the Civil Rights Movement in the United States from the mid-1950s until his death by assassination in 1968. He was an advocate for equality between all races and a civil and economic rights Activist. Because of his leadership, bravery and sacrifice to make the world a better place, Martin Luther King was awarded with the Nobel Peace Prize. His incredible public speaking skills and ability to properly get his message across can clearly be scene throughout the speech. Tone: Dr. King delivered his speech at the university of Oslo in Oslo Norway in front of a large group of people.
In “Learning to Read”, Malcolm X uses rhetorical analysis to argue how African Americans continued to struggle in gaining education due to racism. He informs people that through our history books, there have been modifications that restrain the truth about the struggles black people faced. Malcolm X encouraged his audience to strive to get the rights that they deserved. He demonstrates that knowledge is very important because the truth empowers us. In his interview he persuades his audience with diction, tone, pathos, ethos, and appeal to emotion to make his point.
Martin Luther King also wanted African Americans to stop putting their money into the economy for the boycott along with them quitting their jobs and boycotting them. Malcolm on the other hand wanted for African Americans to start their own business and start from scratch that way no one could tell them what to do nor could they take it away from them they would be starting fresh. Malcolm wanted it done a certain way and if that certain way led to a little violent he didn't care he was just trying to get them to where they could run their own business and start new and fresh. Malcom wanted us to spend more money in your own community instead of someone else that way the money we spent would go towards our own community and not another one. Martin Luther King Jr said "There is nothing quite as effective as a refusal to cooperate economically with the forces and institutions which perpetuate evil in our communities.
His aim was for blacks to be completely separated from the other races so that they could develop their own homeland. His ideas proved to be controversial. Although his leadership was helpful in terms of spreading black nationalism, his ideas of “complete segregation’ wasn’t prefered by many. Why did civil rights
Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most influential leaders of his time and played a crucial role in the African-American Civil Rights movement. Luther was a charismatic leader who took a firm stand against the oppressive and racist regime of the United States (US), devoting much of his life towards uniting the segregated African-American community of the US. His efforts to consolidate and harmonise the US into one country for all is reflected in many of his writings and speeches spanning his career. As a leader of his people, King took the stand to take radical measures to overcome the false promises of the sovereign government that had been addressing the issues of racial segregation through unimplemented transparent laws that did nothing to change the grim realities of the society. Hence, King’s works always had the recurring theme of the unity and strength of combined willpower.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are two profound African American figures in history. They both fought for equality and to better humanity. But, the tactics they used were very different. Their different views may have been rooted from the where they were raised. Martin Luther King Jr. grew up in a middle class family and received a very solid education.
Introduction: Malcom X urges the Negro community to fight to gain the equal rights they deserve by taking action against their white oppressors. He emphasizes that blacks will gain their rights either thorough voting, with the ballot, or else through the inevitable violence with the bullet. Thesis [part a] Like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., also fighting for the civil rights of black Americans in the 1960s, but in a more peaceful manner, Malcom X takes a different approach.
Martin Luther King Jr said,“We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools”. In the late 1960s, racial tension was high, African Americans were not given the right to vote, the right to a fair education, and the right to a fair judgement. This then led to the separation of schools and the destruction of a normal livelihood. Dr.King and Malcolm X, two men in the face of oppression rose up to challenge the racial barrier, thus changing the world forever. Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X seem to have mutual respect and an equal understanding of the inequality, their philosophies were quite different from each other.
African american rights were the main concern of many people, along with government corruption and the unwillingness to help. Malcolm X was no banal man he was a extravagant civil rights speaker, he showed the truth on how coming together can put the end to African American indifference. Due to the lack of government the dichotomy between african americans and the white men was still a major problem ; as African americans needed to put and end to the separation and earn civil rights. Malcolm speaks out to all who are willing to obtain their civil rights. ”In Ballot or Bullet” Malcolm X uses Anaphora, Antithesis, Ethical Appeal, Word choice, and Rhetorical question to show the lack of support from government and how coming together can help fight back.