Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence. MLK’s “I have a dream” speech promoted the idea of integration. He believed that the races were created equal and that blacks should be respected as American citizens. Malcolm X followed Muslim principles and believed that he would protest “by any means necessary.” He would do whatever needed in order to obtain freedom for African-Americans whether it be violence or nonviolent. Malcolm opposed integration and believed that blacks needed to fend for themselves in the fight against whites. His aim was for blacks to be completely separated from the other races so that they could develop their own homeland. His ideas proved to be controversial. Although his leadership was helpful in terms of spreading black nationalism, his ideas of “complete segregation’ wasn’t prefered by many. Why did civil rights …show more content…
It caused further segregation throughout the country. As blacks began to speak out for freedom and equality, whites pushed back. Rather than listening to the speeches of black leaders in order to understand their plight for equality, whites ignored peaceful protests and instead used police force to subdue large crowds. The Montgomery bus boycott succeeded in ending the ordinance for the segregation between blacks and whites on public buses. However, it further segregated the social interactions between the two races. The freedom riders proved a point to show the strength of the black race, but caused a divide as the white race became threatened and ---more
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Malcolm x preached for black supremacy and believed that whites and blacks should not be treated equally and that whites should not have rights. There different views are shown in these two quote “I have a dream that one day,down in alabama,with its vicious racists, with its governor having lips dripping with the words of “interposition” and “nullification”--one day right there in alabama little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sister and brothers”(martin luther king ). This shows how different their beliefs truly are and how martin luther king wants rights for alls and as he says that is his dream in his own
“For months, the buses were almost empty because most of the riders had been black.” (Doc. A) Do to the fact that there was full participation, meaning that no African Americans continued to ride the bus, it made the bus ride a successful protest. “I think it is the first time that a whole Negro community has come together this way and for so long
Not only did they use different tactics one of them wanted a more beneficial impact for the African American community and employment crisis. Malcolm X shows that he wanted to have a different approach and impact on the problem when he stated, "That will enable us to create employment for the people of our community so they don't have to be constantly be involved with boycotting and picketing...." unlike MLK, Malcolm X didn't want to be a part of boycotting and picketing businesses instead he wanted African Americans to own businesses because they could obtain more money and hire more African Americans at their desirable amount. Martin Luther King, Jr's tactic for obtaining his goal was to boycott businesses and companies to influence white business owner to hire more African Americans shown by MLK stating, "Along with the march as a weapon for change in our nonviolent arsenal must be listed the boycott." by this statement MLK means the weapon that changes society is the boycott (which is the refusal of buying goods from a business, company, store, or etc.) compared to Malcolm X's tactic for obtaining his goals MLK had a whole new approach to the problem which they
Integration would require an eventual acceptance of an outside culture which had been incredibly loathed within the existing communities. In a way Malcolm was warning the African Americans that even though the civil rights movements is optimistic in its approach of reaching equality, the outcome is unrealistic. One could even argue that the reason Martin Luther King Jr was the prefered representative of the civil rights movement over Malcolm X was due to the fact Dr. King wanted to integrate. By choosing to integrate instead of separating, that decision allowed the racist population of the United States to continue its oppressive nature again the black population which had carried on from the Eras of Slavery and Jim Crow. Instead of openly demonizing African Americans like they did before the 21st century, the oppressive bourgeoisie was now using the media to misrepresent the population and now, more than ever, people are starting to stigmatize black people with uneducated
While many people are familiar with the civil rights movement and the work of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X some are not aware of the similarities and differences between the two. I have chosen to take the time to put these two men side by side for a comparison. Both of these men where activist for the African America community. They had different lifestyles therefore taking different approaches on how they would fight for rights. Martin Luther King Jr. was a nonviolent man who believed in equality for all.
MLK argues for the need to desegregation rather reluctantly, while Malcolm X has no hesitation in calling on the African American community to address the problem. MLK also is careful to explain the reasons that he is rebelling and the process of nonviolence. Malcolm X on the other hand is less cautious and simply reasons that it is necessary to act because of the oppression of black rights. In addition, with discussing justification, MLK turns to religion in explaining what is a just and unjust law, while Malcolm X keeps his entire speech completely secular. In addition, overall the entire process of desegregation according to each man is different.
King believed in “peace, no violence, and unity between all” (www.biography.com). In contrast, Malcolm X was all for violence. Malcolm X was born into a Muslim household. He relied heavily on his faith and was extremely influential towards pushing others to join the Islamic community. During his journey Malcolm X even “grew the Islamic population in America from 4,000 to 40,000 members by 1960” (www.biography.com), proving his dedication to the Muslim faith.
Do you support almost unnecessary violence or would you rather live as a non-violent individual if they lead to the same outcome? President of the SCLC, Martin Luther King, Jr. was a famous Civil Right Leader. Before his fame, he graduated at the age of 15 and never stopped the level of perseverance he possessed. His hard work and perseverance soon led him to undertake the role of leading the world-known “Civil Rights Movement.” Born and raised in a world of cruelty, that got him thinking of ways to stop segregation from a young age.
What differences did Martin Luther King Jr and George Wallace’s have? Did they have any similarities? Though they both wanted freedom, they showed it in very different ways. King was against segregation and was nonviolent in the process of trying to get equality for everyone. Meanwhile Wallace was for segregation and although he didn’t directly use violence he had an undertone for it.
Malcolm X’s idea about working in two groups, a group of blacks and a group of whites, would lead to less violence and would work better in America in the 60s. In document B , I Have a Dream Speech by Martin Luther King, Jr, He says “With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.” Which at that time was very unrealistic for americans. This thinking caused a lot of violence because people believed that whites were better than blacks, which means that people will fight to keep things as they are so things don't change for them. While in contrast Malcolm X said I doc.
Martin Luther King and Transcendentalism Martin Luther King Jr. could be considered one of the more important historical figures in our county’s history. He was the leader of the Civil Rights Movement which took place during the 1950s and 1960s. His “I Have a Dream” speech spurred the end of segregation in our country and the beginning of equality between blacks and whites. Along with being a leader, he was also a Baptist minister, as well as a husband and a father to two sons and two daughters.
DBQ: Martin Luther King and Malcolm X: Rewrite During the 1960’s there was a greatly increased in violence in America. There were riots, bombings, racism, and discrimination. Many African American were mistreated due to the racist people who intervened the African Americans from doing anything. Two civil rights activists wanted change for African Americans and were both fighting for the same cause, civil rights.
Malcolm X didn’t agree with what King’s views, he believed that MLK’s dream was not a dream but a nightmare. Martin Luther King Jr’s approach to civil rights and equality was non-violent protesting, sit-ins, and getting as much people together as possible while not using violence. However, Malcolm X’s approach to this was almost the opposite. He was against the views of whites and he was willing to do whatever was needed to achieve
Martin Luther King Jr said,“We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools”. In the late 1960s, racial tension was high, African Americans were not given the right to vote, the right to a fair education, and the right to a fair judgement. This then led to the separation of schools and the destruction of a normal livelihood. Dr.King and Malcolm X, two men in the face of oppression rose up to challenge the racial barrier, thus changing the world forever. Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X seem to have mutual respect and an equal understanding of the inequality, their philosophies were quite different from each other.
The most important decision of a leader is the style of leading they decide to use when inspiring others, or providing a vision for the future. By looking at the past, it is proven that some leadership styles are guaranteed to be more effective than others. The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights provides significant evidence of how different styles of leading can turn out to be a major success or defeat. Malcolm X’s leadership style included using violence to protest against violence and unequal rights, as well as supporting the segregation of African Americans and the whites. Martin Luther King’s style included nonviolent marches and protests against violence, and peacefully fighting for integrating the blacks and whites.