The OJ Simpson case is a case that involves a lot of controversy. On June 13 1994, there were two murders that involved Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman. The trial lasted for eleven months. OJ Simpson was accused of killing his ex-wife and her friend. There was a lot of evidence presented to prove that OJ Simpson committed the crime, however OJ Simpson was found “not guilty”. Although there was a lot of evidence to prove he was guilty, a lot of the evidence was contaminated because it wasn’t secured properly. The detectives that were in charge of the OJ Simpson case were Mark Fuhrman and Philip L. Vannatter. While they were investing the crime scene and collecting evidence, they made a lot of mistakes with packing the evidence. For example, …show more content…
Also as said in the article, “the blood samples were collected improperly” (USA Today). Since the blood samples were collected improperly, the dna evidence for the case became invalid. Moreover, during the investigation, the police found a shoe print at the crime scene. The article states that, “a bloody shoe print found….Simpson’s genetic type wasn’t present but his ex-wife’s genetic fingerprint was on it” (USA Today). The police used dna fingerprinting to find out whose blood it was. The police also used polymerase chain reaction as shown in document A. They used the pcr to find the locus of the chromosomes. As shown in document A, the police were able to find the location of a lot of chromosomes using pcr. Pcr is used to generate millions of the same dna sequence in a short amount of time. The dna sequence that contains a lot of base …show more content…
This made the jury of the trial be more cautious on their decision because the detective could have tried to put OJ Simpson in jail because of his race. Also the technology for DNA during the time was not very good, and evidence would not be packaged well as they do today. Many times, the evidence that was collected would become contaminated. Contaminated evidence played a big part in the OJ Simpson trial, therefore many of the jury began to believe that OJ Simpson was innocent. If the trial were to be held today, a lot of this OJ Simpson was able to get away with would not happen today. He wouldn’t be able to get away with it because evidence and analyzing DNA is a lot more precise and accurate. However, if I were a juror, I would have said that OJ Simpson was guilty because a lot of the evidence provided connected to OJ Simpson. Also if the trial was held in current day, I wouldn’t have to worry about the evidence being false or contaminated because it would have been checked a lot before being presented in
The case of O.J SimpsonTopic: The case of O.J Simpson Question: was he guilty Thesis: i think that he was guilty for his crime Orenthal James Simpson or also known as O.J. Simpson was accused of murdering his own wife on June 19941. He had to go to court with one of his good friends his name was Robert kardashian. Robert kardashian was his defense attorney he was the guy that saved O.J. Simpson from going to jail. Well not being guilty of murder that night. The trial happened between November 9 1994 to October 3 1995.
O.J Simpson Police Report On June 13, 1994 at 12:10 am, the police were called to 875 South Bundy Drive, Brentwood, California. At the scene there appeared to be two bodies later identified as Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. The two were thought to have died between 10:15 and 11:00 on June 12, 1994. At the scene a single bloody glove was found, thought to have been left by the murderer.
It was a calm night in the peaceful neighborhood of Brentwood on June 12, 1994. That is until neighbors reported hearing a dog barking around 10:15 pm. A man by the name of Sukru Boztepe notice the dog, and when approached to inspect it, he saw it had red spots on its paw. These spots were soon traced back to Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman. Mr. Boztepe discovered the bodies of the individuals outside Nicole’s estate on June 13, 1994, at 12:10 am.
It was all about racism, and that interfered with the law. For example In Tom's trial, there was no medical proof that he took advantage and raped Mayella Ewell but just because she was a white person, her word was automatically deemed to be the truth when it was held up to the credibility against that of someone who was black. But, at Simpson's trial, there was numerous amount of medical proof that placed him at scene. At the crime scene of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman, blood was found inside OJ Simpson’s car, his pair of socks, and a pair of his rubber gloves, among many other things that were inside the car (Barak, Leighton and Flavin 78). For the reason of social status, the jury looked past this evidence of guilt, and that was unlawful.
However, when the case reached the courtroom there seemed to be minimal focus placed on the actions of O.J. Simpson on June 12, 1994. The trial was deliberately turned into a charade for the entire country to witness; there has never been a spectacle such as the Simpson trial before, and there has not been one since. The defense turned the murder trial into a race riot portraying the lead detective at the crime scene, Mark Fuhrman, as a racist and discrediting the evidence by suggesting he planted it to frame an innocent black man (Bonesteel). The defense did a brilliant job of distracting the jury from the evidence against O.J. and bringing their attention to the racist failures of the LAPD. The spectacle the defense created in the courtroom would not have been necessary unless there was something Simpson was trying to hide regarding his actions on that infamous Sunday morning in
He had been arrested, and sentenced. As Simpson committed the action, he reportedly told himself that he would “be innocent due to what he had done”. This shows how he displayed action instead of rational
I think that there is more evidence against OJ being the murder then there is reasonable doubt against. I think that although the glove didn't fit OJ’s hand in the courtroom there are many factors that could have altered the size of the glove before he tried it on in court. Due to the prior number of 911 calls involving violence between OJ and Nicole, this kind of behaviour would follow in the same footsteps. Also they had strong evidence against OJ because the blood type found at the scene matched his and only 0.5 percent of the population has this blood type (“The Trial of O. J. Simpson: The Incriminating
The O.J. Simpson murder case was about the former professional football star and actor, O.J. Simpson. It was one of the most controversial and talked about trials during the time. The trial was held in California and spanned from 1994 to the verdict in 1995 where he was declared not guilty. He was tried on two counts of murder after the deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and waiter Ronald Lyle Goldman, in June 1994. Based on the evidence on the scene of the murder, the police department led to the conclusion that it was indeed Simpson who was the prime suspect of the horrific event.
Blood was also found on the inside of the vehicle. After testing, results showed a mixture of Simpson, Nicole, and Goldman’s DNA. The prosecution used this information to accuse Simpson of using the vehicle to drive to and from the crime scene. As before, the defense tried to challenge the DNA evidence. The DNA of
It 's circumstantial, biological, and class. It was crucially important to the case. At the crime scene, the investigators found blood. They collected it and analyzed it, by running tests. The tests came back to prove that the blood was the same type as O.J. Only 0.5% of the population would have matched.
NFL Great OJ Simpson dominated the field while bringing much attention to his love of the game, little to be known that his life came crashing down by jealousy and rage. The year 1994 proved to be the beginning of an avalanche of events causing eruption, chaos and pandemonium which brought his defense to the fact he was wanted for the Murder of his long time wife Nicole Brown , and Ron Goldman. Through the eluding of cops, national defense livestreamed throughout the world, and interruption to sports throughout the country, this is the most sought after cases and the world is out to prove his guilt after definitive evidence proving he was a murderer. With evidence, and insight I will give reasoning why in fact he is a guilty man and should remain behind bars.
The O.J. Simpson case was a different one because he was a celebrity. The celebrity status made all the difference in the case, as most people had diverse views on the case. As a famous individual, the media also had the chance to broadcast the trial and give differences of opinion on the case. The celebrity status had a significant influence in the O.J. Simpson case as the public had to struggle with an image he had created for many years. People knew O.J. Simpson as a footballer and an actor with a charming character impossible to hurt anyone.
OJ Simpson is Indeed Innocent “If it doesn’t fit, you have to acquit,” this quote said by one of OJ Simpson’s attorneys, Johnny Cochran, is widely known for its impact on the controversial case of OJ Simpson. From 1994-1995 OJ Simpson was known as one of the most controversial cases in the USA due to the verdict that OJ was innocent of the murders of his ex wife and one of her friends. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman met an untimely demise, and the only suspect the police ever reviewed was OJ Simpson. OJ was later caught in a low speed chase in a white Ford Bronco before being taken into custody and put on trial. In the sensationally controversial court case involving OJ Simpson as a suspect for murder, The innocent ruling
O.J. Simpson was a famous football player and that was accused of killing his ex-wife nicole brown , also her boyfriend Ron Goldman. They were brutally stabbed to death on June 12, 1994 at the resident of Nicole brown condo in Brentwood. Before the bodies were ever recovered Oj had packed his bags and caught a flight to Chicago, later he received a phone call saying that Nicole Brown was murder. The cops wanted to talk to him and later he had lead the cops on a hot pursuit chase and they apprehended him. OJ Simpson should be held accountable for murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman.
was able to be convicted after a series of evidence was collected against him. There was a significant amount of DNA evidence that was found both at the crime scene and Simpson’s home that suggested he was involved with the murder. Blood samples were found on a sock in Simpson’s home that matched that of Nicole. Additionally blood was found inside of O.J.’s Ford Bronco, which he had ran from the authorities in. Much of the DNA evidence was questionable, as the defence pressed that it had not been collected properly.