Breanna Blanar
Mrs. Curry-Minuni
Advanced Placement English and Composition
23 February 2023
Rhetorical Analysis Rough Draft If you learned that your family was in debt yet again, would you help them? In 1847, Eliza Stacey, a mother who is expecting a child, is writing to her father-in-law, Edward Stacey, to ask for his help a second time. The Stacey family, living in Canada, has unexpectedly entered debt yet again. Eliza Stacey is anticipating a child, her husband George is arrested, and the cold weather is upon her family. In her letter, Eliza Stacey employs rhetorical devices such as emotional appeals, rhetorical questions, and word choice to convince her father-in-law to help her family in this dire situation. To begin, Eliza Stacey extensively applies emotional appeals in her letter to her father-in-law. She writes, “You can imagine my distress and tears, and poor George was distraught at leaving me suddenly with everything to do, and my baby due in about two weeks’ time.” In this excerpt, she employs the words:
…show more content…
She states, “The fellow hired our horse about four years ago, on which he rode to Montreal so hard, and in such terrible weather, that he killed him.” When Eliza Stacey employs the words “so” and “such,” they amplify the meaning of words following them. In doing this, it allows the reader to fully understand the context and severity of her words; it draws a picture in the reader's mind. To continue, Eliza Stacey concludes with, “I remain, your deeply afflicted daughter.” Writing the word, “daughter,” serves as a reminder to Edward Stacey that they are close family, and can make him feel obligated to help her. The phrase: “deeply afflicted” continues to serve a reminder that Eliza Stacey’s family is struggling. Utilizing this phrase as a closing remark ensures that the reader will remember that the Stacey family needs help in this desperate
Mary Ann Shadd Cary uses rhetorical techniques as well as various claims to establish the necessity of her newspaper. These techniques contribute to the importance of the newspaper by emphasizing freedom for slaves and raising on the argument on slavery. One technique Mary Ann Shadd Cary uses is figurative language. Her usage of a metaphor raises the argument on freedom of speech for African Americans. “We need an organ too, for making our voice heard at home.”
To achieve this, she primarily focuses on the impact George's absence has had on the family. In this section specifically, Eliza uses repetition of the rhetorical question to appeal to her Father in Law's emotions, which is the art of pathos. Despite their debt, her family had also had to pay almost 80 extra pounds for legal fees and interest regarding the case, and without a man's income, there was no plausible way for Eliza to pay this off herself. Eliza pleads, "How can I survive?" (52), "How can I now do it?"
Celia Wright tells about her growing up in a home that had bibles, and how she would read the bible when she was litte but as she became older when she did read the bible she really wouldn 't get understand what it was saying. She says it was like the words was in a different languge, and she couldn 't decifer wheather what she was reading was a parable and what wasnt. I have always thought that i was the only one that had a hard time understand and desifering what the bible was describing but after watching Celia 's video i realized that i wasn 't alone. I also struggle with reading my bible everyday like i should and i have been trying to work on it because the word is our weapon to use against satin and it helps to understand the what
Pope Francis in September brought Good News to all of us: addressing us at our depths with respect and reminding us of the constant need to live into the spiritual and patriotic ideals we profess. For over 35 years Jubilee has been a bridge to make this possible. Daily, year round, our Kitchen doors are open to anyone in need of a hot mid-day meal, of a welcoming community, and of support in other ways. We assist the elderly and shut-ins through Jubilee Pantry and empower children from impoverished families to thrive in school through John Heinz Child Development Center.
While trying to lead her father-in-law to help her during these times, Eliza Stacey employs an abundance of emotional appeals and multiple rhetorical questions to efficiently persuade Edward Stacey. Towards the middle of her letter, Eliza Stacey pivots on using rhetorical questions to allow her father-in-law to feel sorry for her, and feel he needs to help her. Eliza Stacey writes in her letter, “I now never lay my weary body full of
and “How can I now do it?” allows Edward Stacey to put himself in her position. These questions paint Eliza as a pitiful invalid who is at the mercy of the
Margeret Thatcher, former prime minister of Great Britain in 2004, delivered a eulogy at Ronald Reagan's funeral to the American people in honor of him. Thatcher uses anaphoras as well as repetition in order to emphasize the importance of Ronald Reagan and his accolades. Thatcher uses an anaphora in the first paragraph. She states: “We have lost a great president, a great American, and a great man, and I have lost a dear friend.” The repetition of the word “great” emphasizes Reagan's great presidency and even more importantly, great character.
The power to grant pardons to federal offenses, the power to command the world’s strongest armed forces, and all the privileges of executive power are vested in one man: the President of the United States. The president’s role and influence among American citizens is highly criticized and often underappreciated due to the difficult decisions and sacrifices required in maintaining the greatest nation. However, an external presence, especially one that has led a nation before, is able to comprehend and recognize the multitude of accomplishments despite a handful of shortcomings. Thus Margaret Thatcher, a former British prime minister and close acquaintance to President Ronald Reagan, is able to accurately praise and enlighten the role of Reagan
Emma Marris uses many types of persuasive elements in her essay “Emma Marris: In Defense of Everglade Pythons”. In her writing she persuades her readers that the pythons should be allowed to be in the everglades since it is not their fault that they are there in the first place. She uses metaphors to relate to the reader and word choice to enhance her writing.
However, she is known as a coquette and is constantly forewarned to curb her charms when in the company of her hopeful suitors who might misunderstand her intentions. Nevertheless, due to certain circumstances, she falls prey to a libertine and subsequently falls to social/moral ruin that eventually leads to her death. It can be inferred that there are many characters throughout the story that played a role in her downfall, but there is but one true culprit solely responsible for Eliza’s fate. One possible candidate is the notorious Mr. Sanford (the libertine of the novel) who plays a major role in Eliza’s
The company continues to ask “will they tell your story?” whereas Eliza strays into “will they tell our story?” then finally, “will they tell my story?” As she claims Hamilton 's agency, she assumes his legacy and goals as well. After all her refusal of a legacy, she now not only accepts the burden of Hamilton’s, but makes its preservation her own.
In America’s history, child labor was fiercely criticized. Many activists of child labor laws and women’s suffrage strived to introduce their own viewpoints to the country. Florence Kelley was a reformer who successfully changed the mindset of many Americans through her powerful and persuading arguments. Florence Kelley’s carefully crafted rhetoric strategies such as pathos, repetition, and sarcasm generates an effective and thought provoking tone that was in favor of women’s suffrage and child labor laws. Florence Kelley uses pathos continuously throughout her speech.
This quote shows that even though Mairs sometimes has difficulty accepting her illness, she knows that there is a growing acceptance of people who must deal with the difficulties that she faces. This ultimately lends a hopeful and positive tone to an otherwise serious and depressing section of her essay. This contrast in tone, but general feeling of hope is key to the type of emotions that Nancy Mairs is trying to educate her readers about. Mair is successful in using multiple rhetorical strategies to connect with the reader.
Josie Appleton’s piece opens with her introducing the fact that body modification has lost its mark of being taboo. Appleton then transitions into describing the different kinds of people that modify their bodies and why they do it. The fact that people used to mostly use tattoos to identify with a group and are now using them to define themselves is heavily enforced. The rest of the piece describes in great detail the different ways people use piercings and tattoos to better understand themselves and mark important milestones. The piece concludes with Appleton claiming that body modification should only be for fashion, because bringing significance to it causes problems.
In July of 1988, Dorothy Ann Willis Richards, the Texas State Treasurer at the time, gave a speech at the Democratic National Convention in Atlanta, Georgia. The room was filled with democratic supporters to whom Richards emphasizes the need to for American politics to "do better." Her speech was intended to persuade the audience to vote for the Democratic party in the upcoming election, rather than the Republican party. Richards attempts to persuade the audience through her use of humor, repetition, and personal anecdotes. Richards kicks off her speech with the humorous statement ,"After listening to George Bush all these years, I figured you needed to know what a real Texas accent sounds like.