Political conservatives in America vastly hold true the original traditions and freedoms in America and rarely compromise with change. One such prominent conservative, John W. Whitehead, in his essay, “The Schools Are Destroying Freedom of Speech,” argues that the modern day public educational system has inflicted unconstitutional restrictions of freedom on its students. Throughout his essay, Whitehead attempts to build his credibility by utilizing the Bill of Rights and different examples to appeal to the ethos, logos, and pathos aspects of his audience – the American citizens; however, Whitehead’s apparent bias, shown through his strong conservative values and passionate tone, causes him to disregard the deeper meaning of the educational …show more content…
That dream is no longer true” (Whitehead 354). Whitehead’s aggressive tone to introduce his essay not only allows his audience to immediately recognize his definitive stance on this issue, but also informs them what will be discussed throughout the essay as well. In spite of Whitehead’s early aggressiveness, he begins to transition to a softer tone by discussing the inadequate knowledge students have of the U.S. Constitution. By applying this less contentious tone, Whitehead gives his audience on the opposing side of the argument reasoning to continue interest in his essay rather than quickly rejecting it. Whitehead includes multiple statistics to support his argument on constitutional education in public …show more content…
On the other hand, given that Whitehead’s only source for this data is “a national survey of high school,” it may be deemed skeptical by Whitehead’s audience causing him to lose credibility for the lack of an authentic source; however, incorporating this data into his essay allows his audience to contemplate another aspect of his argument. Furthermore, considering that Whitehead made the lack of constitutional education clear to his audience begs the question of how this information contributes to the main idea of his essay. Through the reason that the quality of education students receive directly correlates with their teacher, Whitehead shows the significance of how poorly schools are educating students about the freedoms and liberties stated inside the U.S. Constitution by using these statistics. This information appears to contribute to Whitehead’s argument by leading his audience to believe that the educational system has become equivocal when educating students on the constitution, therefore restricting students to fully comprehend the freedoms and liberties inside the U.S. constitution. Whitehead, however, fails in one extremely important aspect of the statistics he gave: none of them are directly associated to freedom of speech in the First Amendment. While each statistic relates to a certain section in the U.S. Constitution, not one
Charles R. Lawrence III is a professor at Georgetown University that publicized an article inside “The Chronicle of Higher Education” and later on in the “Duke Law Journal” which was headlined “On Racist Speech”. Ever since Charles Lawrence was young he was quite the anarchist on the matter of the first amendment protecting racial slurs. He encourages University’s to stand up and reprimand such absurd speech with a reinforced approach without completely throwing out the first amendments rights. Charles Lawrence uses Brown v. the board of education as an example, the discrimination is causing psychological effects that are turning an educational environment into an environment of destruction. As he then goes on to explain that if racial speech
Censorship in schools concentrates on creating a non-beneficial and unhelpful learning environment for students. Americans should be aware that textbooks often only present a positive image of US history because it doesn’t tell the truth about how we came to be as a nation. In Denver, Colorado, students are protesting about a review of the AP history curriculum which
My research will be on the case law of reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools. I will discuss how the pledge was created through the constitution and changed over time, US presidency, government involvement in public school systems, and legal cases presented through the Supreme Court of Justice that’s made an impact to the recitation of the Pledge since it was founded. Francis Bellamy wrote the original “pledge” (Baer1). He wanted to conjoin together government, politics ,and religion(2). Not only wanting to change the role of things he mainly was striving for equality(2).
He offers the example that a current typical college student was born in the nineties, under the no child left behind educational model and that they came into the knowledge of politics on the internet. He also says that their first presidential election may involve Donald Trump and reminds us to lets kids be, that it is all just a part of growing up. In conclusion, Psu states that nothing was ever proven by acting as though there is nothing new to learn. There is an innocent idea at the heart of student protest, it may be desperate or even gaudy, but it is never as cynical as those who caused it.
Although civil literacy was important in America during the Civil Rights Movement, today it is in steep decline based on many factors. In most schools, classes focusing on civics or similar themes are virtually nonexistent. The reading states, "fewer and fewer schools require civic courses". Most social studies classes barely touch on the subject. Since the younger generation of America is the one that most needs to be educated in civics, this could be threatening because they can 't run a country while simultaneously knowing nothing about it.
The unconstitutional Pledge should banned. “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” These are the 31 words millions of children across the United States recite each and every morning as they face the flag and place their hand over their hearts. Most students go through this daily obligation without objection and probably without giving it much thought at all, however that is not true for all students. Many students oppose the pledge for a multitude of reasons, some on philosophical grounds, and others for religious reasons.
“Feigning Free Speech on Campus” is a 2012 op-ed article written by Greg Lukianoff, an attorney with a passion for First Amendment Rights. Lukianoff brings up points that are just as valid today as they were 4 years ago. Youth voter participation is low and it is impossible to ignore the effects of educational institutions hampering inquiry and expression of the students. The main claim to this issue is not simply that colleges engage in some degree of free speech repression, but that the methods implied on campuses are no less that any other institution that controls and influences public awareness of political issues. Lukianoff is successful and effective in his appeal to his target audience of young adults.
In my opinion, freedom of speech is one of our most sacred constitutional rights as Americans; therefore the role reversal that has taken place within the past few decades regarding freedom of speech does not phase me. As someone who considers themselves a fairly strong conservative I'm smart enough to realize that the Republican party is flawed and the constituents who make up the party are even more so. My view of the Constitution does not come from that of a conservative, but from someone who interprets the Constitution based off of how the founders viewed it. While Ronald Reagan was by far my favorite president by no means was he perfect. Even though I'm a Republican and strong supporter of Reagan if I was alive back in 1966
On the topic of the supreme court, law dictating what students have to say in school are governed by the people, granted that the students are exempt from the voting pool as they are minors. This is because the people elect representatives who then appoint court judges and these judges then determine what is and is not constitutional. This, when contrasted with the iron fist of the
While reading the novel Fahrenheit 451, i realized the author, Ray Bradbury described the role of censorship by putting together the personal freedom that one person has, to the freedom of expression that person was giving. Bradbury describes the right of the First Amendment and the rights we have as a human being. The First Amendment is about the freedom of speech that one person has for themselves. Once a man named Justice Holmes, said the meaning of the First amendment was “freedom for what we hate.” A role of censorship was played by sending a very direct or forward message that tells readers what may or may not happen if they allow the government to take control of what they do or do not read.
Freedom of Speech Across the United States, there is controversy over speech codes set in place on several college campuses for the reasons to protect student’s emotional stability and from speech they view as hateful. Speech codes do not only infringe upon our first amendment right, but are a dereliction of the Founding Father’s original purpose and intention for the country. Although the First Amendment guarantees our right to freedom of speech, there is a difference between freedom of speech and using your right to shut others down. Colleges across the US are infringing students’ rights by implementing speech codes.
When it comes to children in schools today, they are no longer required to recite the pledge of allegiance in classes, mostly due to a religious reference “In God We Trust” and how it is perceived as going against or challenging other religions. In my opinion I feel that the pledge has a number of beneficial aspects, many of the problems in schools today, like bullying, acceptance, and the overall feeling of being singled out, stems from no longer being made to understand we all are here in America for the same reason, to enjoy the freedoms and opportunity’s that are available to us. In my opinion, the main goal of the pledge of allegiance being recited in schools, is to create a bond of companionship, that is not separated by race or religion, but men and woman who bond as countrymen, in order to maintain their freedom and liberty. “The Pledge of Allegiance was written in August 1892 by the socialist minister Francis Bellamy (1855-1931).
Free Speech on College Campuses Free speech is a freedom granted under several constitutions in the world, including the American constitution. The idea of free speech is one that is placed in the law to avoid situations where the ruling government or institution is not able to curtail the freedom of those being ruled. The idea is one that serves to whistle blow on any wrong that may be done by a government or an institution. This idea of free speech extends to universities and colleges, bringing into perspective the idea of free speech onto our campuses. Moreover, I will be discussing different aspects of free speech among campus students depending on the views of different people.
As Americans, we view the Constitution as a stepping stone to making the great country we live in today. Yet, we the people of the United States failed to realize another component in order to form a perfect union. Which is to establish and promote equal opportunities for a quality education for all. However, we live in a society where social locators such as class, gender, and race are huge factors in the determination of one’s educational future.
Free speech is like the bowl of candy on your teachers desk from when you were a kid. Everyone would end up getting a piece in the end but there was always that one kid who stole a piece. Free speech has had a lot of challenges it the past and has changed since the original writing of the Bill of Rights. Free speak in school didn’t just recently become a problem.