The Roman Republic was a magnificent political system with a lifespan of more than 500 years. Its impact on the modern world cannot be overestimated, as it served as a template for numerous democratic regimes all over the world. Nevertheless, historians cannot dispute the Republic’s eventual collapse, and several possible causes have been put forth. The rise of strong military leaders who overthrew the system of checks and balances that had previously kept the government in check is, in my opinion, the most significant cause that contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic. The Roman government was established in the early Republic on a complicated system of checks and balances that were meant to prevent any one person or party from acquiring excessive power. The Senate, popular assemblies, and magistrates were all under the control of …show more content…
Caesar proclaimed himself dictator for life after defeating his adversary Pompey in a civil war, essentially ending the Republic’s period of democratic rule. His murder in 44 BCE did not bring the Republic back to its former splendor since Octavian, his successor, eventually proclaimed himself emperor and founded the Roman Empire. There were numerous approaches to lessen the harm brought on by the emergence of strong military leaders (Coats, R. M., & Pecquet, G. M. 2013). First, the Senate should have taken stronger action to stop these leaders from usurping power by using their armies. Over time, the Senate’s influence had significantly decreased, and it was now more of a ceremonial assembly than a reliable check on the executive branch. The Senate might have been able to stop military leaders from obtaining excessive authority if it had continued to play a role in the
The Legislative Branch (Congress) is similar to the Roman assemblies (like the Senate). Finally, the Judicial Branch is similar to the Praetors of Rome. The U.S. even named one house of Congress, the Senate, after the Senate of Rome. Law Roman law had a significant
The Roman Republic was often known for its lasting influence for the development of Western political governance and ideals and is often hailed as a beacon of democracy in ancient history. But an in depth look reveals it to be more complex. While the Roman Republic held democratic elements that allowed citizen participation and representation, its political structure was ultimately characterized by a significant concentration of power among the elite and few for the average person. This essay will explore the extent of democracy within the Roman Republic, analyzing key aspects such as the electoral system, legislative bodies, and social hierarchy and the democratic nature and the implications it had on the overall governance of the state.
The Senate was a group of legislators that was selected from the elite and wealthy class The Senate had two co consults to keep each other in balance There was a dictator that controlled everything when the Republic was in danger Caesar conquered several lands with the help of Pompey and Crassus By 48 BCE, Caesar was in control of all of Rome’s holdings
In this particular chapter, Polybius contributes how the Romans were able to rise to power was due to the system of government that was in place. He goes into in-depth analysis of the flaws each system of government had in the past, from kingship, aristocracy, and democracy, as well as pointing out their strong points. He stated that “For it is plain that we must regard as the best constitution that which partakes of all three elements (kingship, aristocracy, and democracy)” (Polybius, VI. 3). He concluded with the idea of a mixed government, where each part of the government will serve as a check of balance to one another.
1. Summarize Polybius’s understanding of the checks and balances in the Roman constitution. Why does he think it is one of the most stable forms of government? Which of the three aspects of the Roman constitution (monarchy, aristocracy, or democracy) does he think predominates in the Roman Constitution?
INTRODUCTION: According to (National Geographic Society, 2022). As the final Etruscan king of Rome was deposed, the Roman Republic was established in 509 BCE. With two representatives chosen by legislative assemblies to preside over the Roman Senate and lead the Roman military, the Roman government functioned as a representative democracy in the form of a republic. Nevertheless, the Roman Republic never aspired to be a direct democracy; instead, it had a fused government that combined elements of "kingship," "aristocracy," and democracy.
The Roman Republic was founded in 509 BC and lasted for nearly 500 years. During this time, Rome became a dominant power in the Mediterranean region, establishing a vast empire that lasted for centuries. However, the Republic itself was beset by internal conflicts, corruption, and a breakdown of the political system that eventually led to its downfall. One of the key factors that contributed to the Republic's decline was the breakdown of the political system. The Roman Republic was initially designed to provide a balance of power among different branches of government, including the Senate, the magistrates, and the people's assemblies.
If it weren 't for need for power and jealously/rivalry between generals ( Maricus, Sulla, Caesar, ad Pompey) the republic would have survived, thrived, and been more democratic. Rome developed into a city-state, first ruled by kings, then formed a new form of government called the Republic. For 500 years, Ancient Rome was governed by the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was not upheld by a written document. The United States government is very similar to Rome’s model of the Republic.
The senate was the advisory board to the consuls. The senate was mostly made up of Aristocrats who served for life, and they were elected by the consuls (Shiffer, 2021). The senate was un-democratic due to the fact that they typically did not allow the plebians (regular Roman population) to join their ranks, as it was only meant for the elite of Rome. The senate routinely overstepped their boundaries when it came to making decisions in Rome, due to the fac that it was made up of mostly influential individuals. This was best emphasized when the senate was able to overrule the vote of the people to go to war against the Dalmatians, as they felt it would reinvigorate the troops of Rome (Brown, 2016).
The structure of governments in Ancient Rome and the United States has experienced drastic changes over the centuries. This essay will compare and contrast the political structures of both ancient Roman and modern United
Although some groups within the legislative body of the Republic had some overlap over another group, the duties and powers were distinct enough that the citizen body had some form of representation. Additionally, because of the veto powers that each group possessed, it could be presumed that if a group vetoed some legislation or policy because ot would not benefit the state, nor the citizen body, it would be fair to assume that the veto facilitates democratic decision making. The role of the veto had significant impact on the administration of legislation and policies, but ultimately allowed for a way to ensure democratic decision making within the Roman
Unit 4 Written Assignment HIST 1421 University of the People Instructor: Christopher Stender The Struggle Towards Democracy: The Road to the Establishment of the Roman Republic Rome's road to democracy was riddled with numerous struggles against kingship, as the people sought to establish a fair and equitable government that represented their best interests. In this paper, I will identify the circumstances that led to the establishment of the Roman Republic, the elements of the republic that made it democratic, and those that called into question its democratic nature.
The Roman Republic greatly influence the many forms of government that came after it, its many contributions to government significantly impacted modern day governments of today. Yet to understand it we must first find knowledge to how the Roman Republic came to be. The answer is fairly simple, due to the harsh rule of the Etruscan they were kicked out of Rome and the Romans formed the Rome Republic. Yet, the Rome Republic developed over time, it when through refinements as time passed. Such things as the Senate, magistrates, tripartite, checks and balances are some of the examples that the Roman Republic influenced on modern U.S. government.
Introduction The Roman Republic was established in 509 BCE, after a long struggle against kingship. The Roman Republic was characterized by elements of democracy, such as the election of officials and the creation of a representative government. However, the Republic was also marked by undemocratic practices, such as the exclusion of plebeians and women from political power. This paper will discuss the circumstances that led to the establishment of the Roman Republic, the democratic elements of the Republic, and the undemocratic practices that made the Republic questionable.
From a non-subjective viewpoint, a democracy is allowing the people to have power and some control over the country. A Republic — which the Roman Republic was — on the other hand, is similar to what a democracy is except it protects the minority rights from the majorities. So, from the viewpoint of Roman Republic, a democracy is allowing the people in the Assemblies to grant office to those that deserve it, having the final say in passing or repealing laws, and making the final decision on peace or war. The Roman Republic did give evidence that they are a democracy such as allowing people the ability to vote and letting the people choose, however, there's also evidence on the Roman Republic not being democratic. Either side of the argument the claim is the Roman Republic was democratic.