Santaland Diaries David Sedaris Analysis

What does any author use allegories for in everyday life? ”Speeches”, stories, “and” even conversation”,”with. So have decided to do some research on the author Theodore Seuss Geisel ( Dr. Seuss) to explain the allegories in his stories because an allegory is when you have a moral in what you are writing or expressing. Allegories are effective to convey ideas in an essay or other expressive ways because they tell you about types of reasoning. In the second paragraph the article will be talking about Allegories are a great way to teach someone a moral of an existing problem or past conflict, “B”ut to put them in a different type of story like how Theodore Seuss Geisel did with most of his books like the book Yertle The Turtle.

Authors use certain styles of writing to make their points/stories more pleasant for the audience to read. In a nonfiction writing, it is sometimes hard to make the book interesting, so authors tend to add more comedic ways to their writing. The Ascent of Man by Jacob Bronowski is a non fictional book about the discoveries and inventions that men have created. The book mainly focuses on the history of man and how he developed mentally and physically to adapt to the new world. A topic such as that is not very interesting to read but the author put a comedic twist on parts of the book, which helps the reader understand and the author himself to make writing the non fictional book more entertaining .

On the outer shell, Grendel is a monstrous villain who hates mankind, but the reader soon realizes, in reality, he just wants to fit in. Since Grendel knows he will never fit in, he decides to destroy what he cannot have and he "[understands] that the world [is] nothing: [but] a mechanical chaos of casualties, brute enmity on which we stupidly impose our hopes and fears. I understood, finally and absolutely, I alone exist" (Gardner 22). Instead of criticizing the villain, Grendel makes the reader sympathize with him by saying " [he] alone exist[s]".

Throughout the conflicts in the book, the twins always stick together through their actions, speech, and stage of moral development. This was done when the twins carried the pig after hunting, suggested that they should paint themselves when confronting Jack’s tribe, and when they let the fire go out and helped

With Ron’s help, Harry can slowly integrate into this completely new world around him and untimely opens a path for Harry a way to win against evil. Ron provides Harry with an outlet to ask questions regarding the wizarding world. For example, when Harry and Ron are on the train to Hogwarts and they are snacking on candies and such Harry asks Ron about some of the candies, “Harry: {picks up blue and gold package} ‘These aren 't real chocolate frogs, are they?’ Ron: ‘It 's only a spell. Besides, it 's the cards you want.

(Villaseñor 21). The use of hyperbole in this statement emphasizes that he hated teachers who destroyed his self-confidence. It also affects readers emotionally because it dramatizes the intensity of his thoughts. Surely, the thoughts of killing a massive group of generalized people does not cause alarm. Those who read about hearts being ripped out and responding with extreme vengeance can see the tremendous effect that these teachers had on him.

Another example of investment is when Liesel is being told the consequences of telling anyone else about the man upstairs. “‘Liesel, if you tell anyone about the man up there, we will all be in big trouble’” He walked the line of scaring her into oblivion and soothing her enough to keep her calm. He fed her the sentences and watched with his metallic eyes. Desperation and placidity.

Even though the truth is revealed, people are already are getting executed. And as being all for perfection (which is what we will talk about next), is very bad because the sins are over the authorizes. SO in a way they are just scared to hear another outcome to the situation. Danforth especially, does not want his image to be torn over a numerous execution of innocent people over nothing. And will destroy his perfection as a Puritan.

Adultery was such a terrible sin to be committed in mid-seventeenth century, especially within the puritan community. Hester wanted to protect the father of her child because she knew that if everyone found out Dimmesdale was the other part taker in this crime then, they both would have been killed but Dimmesdale, being the minister, helped and saved her by letting her off easy, thus wearing the scarlet as her punishment. When she first realizes what the letter is capable of, she does not like it and is ashamed for herself. The townspeople would treat her very differently as well as talk rudely about her. In chapter twenty one, the narrator states, “Her face, so long familiar to the townspeople, showed the marble quietude which they were accustomed to behold there.

He is most worried that he will be destroyed because witchcraft is in his family. Luke 6:27-28 says, "But I say to you who hear, love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you," (Barker 1550). This is a perfect example of how Hale treated the people of Salem, and the exact opposite of how Parris treated the. Knowing this, it is obvious that Hale for the people in knowing the truth of morality; where as, Parris does not care about the truth but just wants what is best for

He/she went from something complicated to something more clear and clean. Also, he/she used more examples while he was talking about the rhetorical choices to make himself more understandable and persuasive. However, in his later draft, he still did not use an attention getter, which is something that for me was necessary because writers need to convince the readers that they need to read the essay. Secondly, the author kept the quotation in his conclusion, which as I previously said was not necessary because he already convinced his audience of what Jaschik was arguing about, who he was trying to persuade, and why he was trying to persuade. So, for me the author should still eliminate that

right after he attached a piece of letter from Stephen Williams to Kellogg regarding the problem between John and the visitors. At the same time, he answered the question directly saying that the

I think the whole lesson of this book was that violence was bad because every time someone fought it ended really badly. This book showed that even though violence seems easy and, you can easily sort things out with a fight it will come with worse consequences. The greasers always fought, and the Socs always jumped but in the end we saw how both of these resulted in two deaths, and a bad fire. In the end both the socs and greasers both realized that fighting was bad, and throughout the book we see ponyboy question why he fights. Johnny is proof that we shouldn’t fight because earlier in the book we learn that he was jumped by Socs, and since then he was always different.

Due to his outlandish lyrics and extreme hatred for censorship he was constantly in battle against his censors. When he was told to put warning labels on his albums, he sarcastically wrote a label that warned all his listeners about the evils of rock and roll and how its antagonists are the actual corrupted ones. Frank Zappa was an English major that loved writing lyrics and did not care what others thought of him. He was definitely hated for some of his philosophies but was also loved for his passion and opposition to censorship. He wrote music to express his ideas on society and government, among other things.

Edmundson began this essay with a confession of his awareness on teacher interpretations. He explains that he is apprehensive of what they will expect and accepts that he sometimes educates to try and buildup the good analysis from students. Then he explains the fact that he does not want to be characterized as “enjoyable.” Edmundson wants them to be disputed and changed by his course. Lol