Hello Family, Yesterday I went to a training in regards to the new open carry gun law. It is a very disturbing and dangerous law. The law basically states that a license person may carry a gun openly in public. There are some exceptions to this law. The person must have the gun in a holster when carried on his body.
Yes, but as I mentioned before the psychological test is a joke and each individual can always find a way to get there hands on a gun. Do we need guns? Yes, so taking away our right to bare arms will bring more harm to individuals. So how can we prohibit shops selling to mentally ill individual? I do not have a clue; all I know is that we all have the right to own a gun.
A halt could be put on a lot of this by just tightening up loopholes in the system of buying guns and making stricter background checks when buying guns and clips to go in people’s guns; especially large round magazines or clips. Making stricter background checks will make mass shootings a lot less likely. If the criminal gets someone else to buy the gun for them, the person buying it might not do it for the criminal because he knows he is more likely to get caught now with the stricter background checks. As of now, under Federal Law, you only have to do background checks on people that buy a firearm if they buy it through a dealer. You can buy a gun offline or at a gun show or a private individual without having to get anything.
We need "common" background tests for the reason that there 's a very gigantic loophole in the existing federal regulation that enables detrimental men and women to receive possession of a gun. When the Supreme courtroom ruled that the possession of a gun for personal protection was a constitutional proper underneath the 2d modification, additionally they ruled that a few classes of people might be denied this right. Among the prohibited classes of humans are felons and the significantly mentally in poor health. Nearly everybody has the same opinion that these are confined and reasonable restrictions on the correct to possess a gun. As a way to make sure that these prohibited people can not acquire a gun, the FBI maintains the country wide
Although one has to show proper licensing to buy an automatic rifle, it does not take away the fact that these automatic weapons are available to people, who plan on using them against the citizens of the U.S. My intent in this letter is to inform you of the effects of these events. Citizens have to think twice before going into public places. Always in fear of a massacre, citizens are scared to exercise their most basic rights because of these events.
In America, the issue of gun control has become an extremely controversial topic. Ever since the formation of this great nation, guns have been key tools and restricting them any further would present incomprehensible consequences. Placing stricter gun laws on the current situation or banning assault weapons will not decrease the death or crime rate but in fact quite the opposite. The republican party believes that with fewer gun restrictions and revision of current standards, we can make America a safer place. The right to bear arms is a fundamental right of any American citizen and this right needs to be protected as the fundamental freedom it is.
In the United States, the Second Amendment protects the right to “bear arms”. The Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution. Amendment Ⅱ). This means that a strong military is a necessity for a safe country and household, so dictating the people’s right to own firearms is considered unconstitutional . Self defense and hunting are the most common reasons for owning a weapon in the U.S.
Therefore, there need to be more laws and limitations when it comes to selling a gun either through a private or public seller. Max Ehrenfreund also says that “Requiring background checks for private sales and transfers would make it harder for convicted felons to buy guns secondhand, but some would still buy guns as a favor to brothers or boyfriends who wouldn 't qualify themselves (Ehrenfreund). Whether someone is selling a gun from a private or public party there needs to be background checks. Background checks need to be more invasive to ensure public safety. Former President Barack Obama once said that “I am taking within my legal authority to protect the American people and keep guns out of the hands of criminals and dangerous people.
Assuredly, lawbreakers who carry out violent offenses should not relish “revolving door” justice. Jack Hunter, author of How Gun Control Kills, lists various examples of “undoubtedly and dangerously psychotic individuals, such as Newtown killer Adam Lanza and Aurora shooter James Holmes, who should have been institutionalized” (Hunter 2012) proving that it is not the gun’s fault for injuring an individual but the person’s mentality. But there will constantly be people who fall through the cracks. There will consistently be corrupt men among us. Truth be told, they vision gun control laws with the same disregard that they outlook laws against murder.
(hardy) (cornell) The gun control people of the United States come in every size, color and shape. It is constantly being said that violent crimes need to stop now! They are focused on taking the guns from the criminals and stop all the random acts of violence happening on our streets and small towns. I don’t think all these gun control citizens understand the true meaning of a criminals mind and how it works. I think a criminal is a criminal whether they have a gun or not.
Gun Control Essay: My view on gun control is that there should be stricter laws on the issue and harsher punishment regarding illegal gun carry. I also believe there should be a mental evaluation of all individuals, wanting to purchase handguns or military-assault rifles and gun permits because a criminal history check isn’t enough to qualify if someone is allowed to carry a deadly weapon. I’m not saying to eliminate the process of a criminal check, but to incorporate both the mental evaluation and criminal history to give someone the right to carry. I believe in the Second Amendment, the right to bear arms and self-defense but, many people abuse the power and capability of what a gun can truly do. It seems like most of violent crimes, involving
Gun control comprises of the government confining the right of American citizens to buy weapons. The diverse sorts of gun control differ from waiting periods among when you buy the firearm and when you really get it, background checks for high-risk individuals so that they can 't buy weapons through legal networks, and totally banning certain sorts of weapons. There are countless methods for crooks to maintain a strategic distance from these regulations ethat the government enforces, making them just reduce the skill of guiltless people securing their home and family 's ability to buy weapons. The waiting period strategy for gun control is essentially a two-step procedure. The initial step in the procedure is that the individual that is in need of a firearm goes
They believe guns should be outlawed except for law enforcement. These groups classify all guns in the same category. There is a difference in guns and what function they were built for. One of the argument anti-gun group’s use is the second amendment is in-valid. These groups argue the constitution needs to be rewritten.
Those who properly own guns would not be able to defend themselves if a situation came to that point. Making something illegal means that its production will spread into homes of such criminals, thus possibly making weapons less safe. New, stronger gun laws are not the answer. “The problem with such [gun control] laws is that they take away guns from law abiding citizens while would-be criminals ignore them.” (Lott) We need to work on enforcing current gun laws to ensure the safety of others. While there should be a background check, looking at criminal history, history of
This notion proves that gun violence now is more prominent than it has ever been in the past. Some people may argue that the best solution to the issue of increasing gun violence could be to eliminate weapons altogether. However, this would be imposing upon the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, which states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (US Const. II.). Along with the fact that the right to bear Arms is a part of the Constitution, there are many people who own guns and are able to use the responsibly.