More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast the Roman Empire and Han China
China and roman empire comparison
Differences between the roman empire and han china
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire. The Han dynasty Empire and the Roman empire stood large and mighty at the start of the Common Era, with the two kingdoms controlling an unprecedented mass amount of populations under their reign. Both kingdoms rose as predecessors from previous political systems that extended lands under one rule, with the Roman Republic expansion in Europe after the Punic wars and the Qin state achieving conquest over six other nearby states creating the first imperial China in east Asia. The heavy hand of the Qin dynasty and the assassination of Rome’s beloved general, Julius Caesar, by the Roman senate, threw both kingdoms into rebellion, ushering in centuries of imperialistic rule for both in their respective timelines.
Politics and social class in Classical China was quite different compared to Classical India. At this time, politics in the ancient time was mostly monarchy and created a strong bureaucracy. Monarchy in Classical China were mostly based upon of the fact of the dynasties. Some famous emperors from this time was Qin Shi Huangdi from the Qin Dynasty and Wu Ti from the Han Dynasty. Qin Shi Huangdi centralized government by putting his people and the system was based on loyalty, trust.
Attitudes towards technology in the Han and Roman empires differed greatly in terms of importance to life. The Roman Empire thought that technology was beneficial, but not necessary. The Romans were divided by social classes and concentrated more on mathematics and sciences, looking down on people who performed labor and used technologies for laboring. The Han Empire had a more positive attitude towards manufacturing and labor. The Han relied heavily on agriculture and thought that tools and water systems were necessary to reduce labor.
Technology can be innovations and inventions that help to accomplish tasks easier. Some examples of technology are agricultural tools, modern computers, electric compartments, etc. In earlier civilizations, the invention of technology itself was a massive part in growing the population and preserving business ordeals like trade. The Han dynasty and the Roman empire both believed technology was essential to their civilizations, but Han China had a positive outlook on labor and its benefits compared to a lesser enthusiasm towards it in Rome. Both the Romans and the Hans admired technology and the people that created it.
Between the 200 B.C.E - 750 B.C. Erra years there ruled two empires both alike in dignity, the great Roman Empire and the Qin and Han Empires. Both began forming their empires into a centralized dictatorship, administered by a large and effective bureaucracy. Similarly in reaching their climax of final ruling, their economics and military increased. Both empires were not only able to to expand their territory vastly, but also dividing the empires into provinces governed by officials while doing so. The empires took on competing rivals, the Romans fought against Greece triumphing into success.
Jenny Reyes Ms. Durso AP World History/ Period 9 October 20, 2015 Han China vs. Classical Athens During the ancient era of Han China and the early classical era in Athens both societies have a similar but different political system that was used to create an organized society. The systems in both societies differ, for instance the Han dynasty the emperor was chosen through Mandate of Heaven whereas in Athens they were a democracy and the citizens elected their leader. On the contrary both societies shared similarities such as both societies didn’t select government officials based on wealth. In addition, both societies had restrictions on women, women had little to no say on politics.
Other than religion, both Rome and China were discrepant in governmental intuition. While Rome had Roman Republic—where people are elected as the president, Han dynasty had a Bureaucracy—where rules are made by state officials. Their way of governing differs from each other because in the Roman Republic, the power was mostly determined by the citizens whereas the Bureaucracy in Han China was the elite classes who made the important decisions. Unlike China, Rome had written laws in the Twelve Tables that were the rules for the government and the society. Additionally, they both are correlative in receiving money of their citizens.
The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were similar because of the use of the Silk Road as a trading route and both grew and developed because of mandatory military service but were different because the Roman Empire declined because of the expansion of its borders while the Han dynasty declined because of enemy military pressure and because of the wealth and power of its aristocracy. Both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty used the Silk Road for trade. Chinese merchants returned from trading expeditions to report that Chinese silk was being purchased and traded all along a trading route named the Silk Road. This long route stretched from East Asia all the way to Italy in central Europe.
Han and Yuan Dynasties The Han Dynasty lasted from 206 BC up until 220 AD. The Han Dynasty was founded by Liu Bang. The Yuan Dynasty was about 1000 years later from 1271-1368. The Yuan Dynasty was founded by Kublai Khan, but he placed his grandfather on the imperial records as founder.
The Han dynasty and Roman empire were two of some the world's influential empires. Both of the two empires had well organized bureaucracies. These two had many great accomplishments, though they differed they were somewhat similar. The Han dynasty's rule was one of the most successful time periods in China’s history.
Han and Roman attitudes toward technology The Han Dynasty and the Roman had opposing attitudes toward technology. The Han were all for technology. They thought of technology as not only a benefit but also as a necessity to be successful. However, the Romans didn’t agree with their way of thinking.
During the Period of the Warring States, three schools of thoughts emerged. Because of the chaos and confusion of this period many individuals searched principles that would restore the political order. It is then that Confucianism, Daoism, and Legalism emerged and provided a deep influence on Political and Chinese traditions. Rulers from several region states adopted elements of the Legalist program. The Qin state in western China soon dominated its neighbors and enacted a centralized imperial rule throughout China.
The Qin and Han Dynasties were similar in that they both believed in a strong centralized government, which strengthened and unified their empires, but they differed in that the Qin followed the strict Legalism while the Han followed the more flexible Confucianism, and the way they interacted with outsiders; the Qin tended to be more defensive of outsiders while the Han were more interactive and wanted to build relationships with foreigners. First, the Qin and Han Dynasties believed in a strong centralized government. The implementation of a strong centralized government led to the success and growth of their dynasties. The centralized government creates a pyramid of power and influence, with the main leader, the emperor, on top.
Legalism was an organization of authentic virtue. Legalism reiterate rules, or a set of laws, to order the society. Confucianism was the contradictory, disturbed with practice and also fairness, though it took it for fortunate that authority contained predominance of men over women, the ancient over the adolescents and the knowledgeable over laborers and artisans. Confucianism has advanced into a complicated and expansive structure that cover China’s civilization, principles, government, and etc. Authority was utterly valuable.
One main similarity is the Roman empire, in the Mediterranean region, and the Hang dynasty, in East Asia, had an overextended population due to nomadic people which diminished the amount of available resources as well as the authority of the central government. One main difference involves the Roman empire where the nomadic people were able to create their own kingdoms first controlling the empire and then being diminished, whereas in the Hang dynasty the nomadic people assimilated to the Chinese culture at the start without altering the political systems.
