In a well-known series of studies, a social psychologist Stanley Milgram in 1974 recruited men through local newspapers to participate in what was called a “memory experiment” at Yale University. The participants were told to only arrive at the lab to get the payment, once they were there the money was their’ s to keep. Once the participants were at the lab they were received by a man in a lab coat “the experimenter” who briefed them on the experiment. He informed them that the experiment was to observe the effects of punishment on memory. Participants were then assigned their roles at random by drawing slips of paper from a hat. Some participants were to be the “teacher,” whose job would be teaching a series of word pairs to the other participants, …show more content…
If the teacher did not do as asked the experimenter would insist, “The experiment requires that you continue.” If the teacher still did not continue, the experimenter stated, “It’s absolutely essential that you go on.” Finally, if the teacher protested further, the experimenter would demand, “You have no choice, you must go on.” Throughout the experiment, if the teacher showed any signs of not wanting to proceed with the experiment, the experimenter would command that he does. With the increasing shocks the learner’s responses also become intense. He would protest by shouting “You have no right to hold me here!” Shouting turned into screams of excruciating pain as the voltage reached severe levels. As an ultimate resort the learner decided to stop answering but the experimenter asked no response to considered as a wrong answer and to administer the shock. The experiment ultimately reached the “Danger” level and this was when the learner’s response turned into nothing but …show more content…
Answers to this can be found in the similar experiments that Milgram conducted but in different conditions. In one variation of the experiment, Milgram removed the “Yale University” label from the study and conducted the study in a rented office in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Lacking the credible nature provided by the name of Yale University, the number of participants dropped by 17 percent. Another factor contributing to obedience is the proximity of the authority. In another variation the experimenter commanded over a telephone rather than from a desk next to the teacher, and this resulted in the number of participants who administered the highest level of shock decreased drastically by 44 percent. The victim’s proximity had an effect as well. In one variation, the learner was moved right next to the teacher, and when the learner refused to receive the shocks, the teacher had to physically hold out the learner’s arm to a shock plate. Here it was observed that administration to the highest level of shock decreased by 35 percent. However, it is imperative to acknowledge the high levels of obedience participants displayed under conditions, in which the experimenter’s authority was not apparent. Over 20% of the participants followed the orders of delivering lethal “XXX” shocks to the victims even when the commands were made over the phone. It’s also important to point out the
He led his men to issue a code red on a marine who was underperforming due to health concerns. The group went along with it. They followed the leader just like the experiment has shown. Not only were the soldiers following orders from an authoritative figure, but they did it without any questions as they are trained to do so. This therefore shows the relation of obedience by respecting authority, between the Stanley Milgram shock experiment, and A Few Good
This Milgram research on respect to authority figures was a series of cultural science experiments conducted by Yale University scientist Stanley Milgram in 1961. They assessed the willingness of survey participants, men from a different variety of jobs with varying degrees of training, to obey the authority figure who taught them to do acts conflicting with their personal conscience. Participants were led to think that they were helping an unrelated research, in which they had to distribute electrical shocks to the individual. These fake electrical shocks gradually increased to grades that could have been deadly had they been true. McLeod's article about the Milgram experiment exposed the fact that a high percentage of ordinary people will
Within 24 hours of the experiment, the prison guards began to humiliate and mentally abuse the prisoners. The prison guards were given little instructions about how to treat the prisoners, except that there was not to be any physical force used on the prisoners. The lack of instructions that
Obedience is tested by how long the subject will continue to “shock the victim”. The point of this study is to determine if Americans are obedient even if they know the act is wrong. 2. What is/are the research questions and/or hypothesis/hypotheses? How obedient would subjects be to researchers when it comes to shocking a victim?
The subject of obedience has long been discussed all around the world. What is it that makes individuals follow orders or fall into line when told to by people in authority? Milgram (1963) became increasingly interested in the subject after the tragedies of the Second World War. He himself was of Jewish descent which situated him and informed his research and choices. Obedience as a determinant of behaviour can have catastrophic consequences, and through his studies of obedience Milgram was looking at the extent a participant will go with administering electric shocks to a victim in the presence of an individual in authority.
In the Milgram shock experiment, participants were told to shock a “tester” when they got a wrong answer. This was staged so that the tester would almost always get the wrong answer. The goal was to see how far a participant was willing to increase the shock strength when presented with an order. According to Khan Academy “Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work became patently clear, and they were asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority” (Khan Academy). The article also states, “When the results of the study came out, they were actually really disturbing because 65% of participants shocked all the way” (Khan Academy).
The Milgram experiment and the society Speaking of one of the most renowned psychological experiment, which even replications on TV are done, is the Milgram experiment, on obedience to authority figures. It involves the measurement of how much participants will to obey the authority, in order to explain the reason why soldiers obeyed to allow the Holocaust, the homicides of millions of Jews, happened. With the participants’ roles as a teacher to punish a learner by incrementing degrees of electric shocks, though they didn’t know it’s staged, 65% of them did it to the last under the horrendous moans and the commands of the experimenters, which surpassed the expectation of 1.2%. Milgram himself elaborated two theories, encompassing theory of
(Russell 2014) Conclusion: Despite controversy Milgram’s experiment was ground breaking. It remains relevant today and is frequently cited in demonstrating the perils of obedience.
The Milgram experiment was conducted to analyze obedience to authority figures. The experiment was conducted on men from varying ages and varying levels of education. The participants were told that they would be teaching other participants to memorize a pair of words. They believed that this was an experiment that was being conducted to measure the effect that punishment has on learning, because of this they were told they had to electric shock the learner every time that they answered a question wrong. The experiment then sought out to measure with what willingness the participants obeyed the authority figure, even when they were instructed to commit actions which they seemed uncomfortable with.
Name : Muhammed Irshad Madonna ID : 250509 Subject : Medical Ethics Due Date : 8/01/2018 Paper : 1-The Milgram Experiment The Stanley Milgram Experiment is a famous study about obedience in psychology which has been carried out by a Psychologist at the Yale University named, Stanley Milgram. He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. In July 1961 the experiment was started for researching that how long a person can harm another person by obeying an instructor.
There had been experimentation on obedience but none had been done like Milgram’s. The experimenter warns, “In this experiment, one of you will be the learner and receive shocks when you make a mistake in word pairs read to you, and the other one will be the teacher and administer the shocks when the word pair repetition is wrong.” (Slater 33). He wanted to see if people would shock a person continuously because someone had told them to. Milgram wanted to know how far people would go.
The Milgram experiment is an experiment conducted by Stanley Milgram who was a psychologist at Yale University that focus on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. He would use an electric shock generator and the generator is mark from 15 volts which is slight shock to 375 volts which danger or severe shock to 450 volts which is beyond danger. As a result, people are likely to follow orders given by authority figure. I mention the Milgram experiment because the father in The Sellout wants his son to keep answering the questions despite that the narrator have to shock himself if he does not know
"Be quiet! Write this down." We sometimes hear this or something like this quite often. We experience, witness, hear or come across commands, instructions, directions and orders daily at our workplaces, homes and schools. What are the factors that forces us or obey (or disobey) them?
The "teachers" continued, at the 180 volts mark the "learner" cried out that he cannot take it any longer. Once reaching 300 volts, the fifty-year-old "learner" yelled about his heart condition and begged to be released. At these points, a decent amount of "teachers" halted the experiment while a large percent continued until the final 450 volt question even though the "learner" had stopped responding. At the 150 volt mark those who were going to stop, did so. If I were in this position I would stop at the first sign of discomfort from the "learner."
Memory studies is the umbrella term for the theoretical approaches that will be discussed in this chapter. It is a fairly new field of studies, due to its quite recent emergence during the 1980s “as an urgent topic of debate in the humanities” (Craps, Rothberg 517). In its beginning, it was mostly concerned with the memories of individuals, or memories of groups or communities like families, cities, countries and ethnicities. Hence, “[e]arly work in memory studies focused on the way memories are shared within particular communities and constitute or reinforce group identity” (517). According to Richard Terdiman “memory is the past made present” and “is a contemporary phenomenon, […] that, while concerned with the past, happens in the present;