How Junk Food Can End Obesity David Freedman In the article, “How Junk Food Can End Obesity,” David Freedman believes that food from health food restaurants and grocery stores can have the same amount of calories and fat that is in fast food. He also states that fast food is making healthier options for those people who can’t afford the healthier food at the restaurants and grocery stores. Many of the fast food restaurants have made changes. I think that is what Freedman is trying to get across.
The article “How Junk Food Can End Obesity” by David H. Freedman makes the claim that eating junk food, or processed food, can make us all healthier. Freedman gives many examples of how some fast-food places have healthier food than a restaurant who specializes in “wholesome” food does, yet many people still think processed food is the problem. Freedman makes different claims in his article and one of his claims is a claim of policy because while he does not want everybody to just stop eating junk food completely, he does want them to make small changes in their diets that way the processed food industry will change the way they make their food. Freedman gives results of research or studies that have been done that show that processed food is not at fault for the obesity rate increasing, he uses this as his warrant, also even though people like Michael Pollan and even the media say that processed food is
In David Freedman’s essay How Junk food Can End Obesity, Freedman makes the claim to policy arguing that instead of demonizing processed foods, Americans should instead support the idea and production of healthier processed and junk foods. He calls on the public to recognize that while many products on the market these days are labeled as “wholesome” and “healthy”, consumers should learn to become aware of the fat and calorie content in these products because many times they have the same- if not more- fat and calorie contents as that of a typical Big Mac or Whopper. In his essay, Freedman primarily places blame on the media and the wholesome food movement for the condemnation of the fast and processed food industries saying, “An enormous amount of media space has been dedicated to promoting the notion that all processed food, and only processed food, us making us sickly and overweight” (Freedman), he further expresses that this portrayal of the
Fast Food Companies Can End Obesity Judging from the title of David Freedman’s “How Junk Food Can End Obesity” published in The Atlantic, Freeman's audience, the upper middle class of America, conjures up an image of Freedman throwing away every piece of scientific data that shows junk food is hazardous to your health. However, this is not the case. Freedman brings to light a more compromising approach to solving America’s obesity problem than others have proposed.
This has scientists wondering how healthy our food can be if we are mass producing by genetically and chemically altering our foods to grow faster to be then again chemically altered to be produced into something else. In the last three decades, the production and consumption of high fructose corn syrup has risen one thousand percent. This means that more sugar is in circulation in our foods which can cause type two diabetes if consumed at great amounts. Also, it has been recorded that about seventy percent of the United States’ antibiotics are consumed by the livestock which are fed with the genetically and chemically altered corn and crops produced in the nation which causes them to have more grams of saturated fat than normal grass fed livestock. This simply adds to the list of undermined health concerns about the production of
Obesity in America has been a problem for many years. The rise in the obesity rate amongst the middle and lower-class population is becoming alarming. Is the problem in the accessibility of the food, the convenience of purchasing and preparation, or the busyness of people’s schedules? In his article, “How Junk Food Can End Obesity,” David Freedman addresses the debate on how fast food restaurants could lead the change to encourage healthier eating choices.
“Today in the United States, by the simple acts of feeding ourselves, we are unwittingly participating in the largest experiment ever conducted on human beings.” Jeremy Seifert certainly knows how to get viewers’ attention, as exemplified by the film blurb describing his 2013 documentary, GMO OMG. The frightening depiction of the food industry is one of many efforts to expose consumers of the twenty-first century to the powerful organizations that profit from national ignorance and lack of critical inquiry and involvement. Seifert effectively harnesses the elements of rhetoric throughout his phenomenal argument against remaining complacent about the food industry’s act of withholding of information about genetically modified organisms from
For years, the health and safety of genetically modified foods have been debated and researched by scientists, but the question still stands: should genetically modified foods be allowed for consumption? The process of genetic modification involves inserting a gene from bacteria or a virus into an organism where it would normally not be found. The purpose is to alter the genetic code in plants and animals to make them more productive or resistant to pests or farming techniques. Genetically modified organisms, more commonly known as GMOs, have been a controversial topic of debate for a number of reasons. The ethics behind genetically modified foods come into question due to an abundance of short and long-term effects from the process, many of which are still unknown today.
The labelling of genetically modified foods is seen as wholesome common sense, and it should be required to have the information on the back of every product. People have been manipulating the genetic makeup of plants for numerous generations using the process of traditional cross breeding. Genetically modified crops have been traded, grown and consumed around the world, including Australia since 1996. The progress and advancement in this field has impacted the way we view the deeper issues of this technology. While genetic engineering crop property has been gradually increasing, so have concerns, in that producing and eating genetically modified foods may pose unexpected environmental and health hazards.
Junk food is responsible for the growing rate of obesity. This is outlined by David freedman in his article of “How junk food can end obesity.” David Freedman has credited the “health-food” motion, and followers of it along with Michel Pollan. Freedman claims that if the America desires to stop the obesity epidemic, or at least reduce its effects, they must shift to the fast meals and processed meals enterprise for assist, now not the “health-food” movement.
In a world where there is a new diet or weight loss regime around every corner, it has become difficult to navigate through the claims as to what’s healthy and what’s not. Walking into a grocery store today, one wouldn’t have to look far to find items labelled “low fat”, “no sugar added”, “reduced calories”, and the same goes for menu items found at many popular fast food restaurants. Is this what we should be eating in order to overcome this obesity epidemic that we live in today? David Freedman seems to think so. In his article “How Junk Food Can End Obesity”, he claims that using modern food processing to make unhealthy foods more nutritious is the answer, however he fails to recognize that people need to know how to make their own healthy
However, nowadays, further studies and inventions created GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms), “where genes from the DNA of one species are extracted and artificially forced into the genes of an unrelated plant or animal” (“Seeds of Deception”). Kara Posso, an environmental science junior, expressively identified some of the benefits of GMO by claiming that “GMO foods, if put to use, could turn out to be more sustainable by allowing us to feed a lot of people. It would also mean using fewer pesticides, which are damaging to water resources” (“Nobel Laureate Praises Benefits of GMOs - The Daily Texan”). The effects of GMO will be
In the 1980’s, the first genetically modified tobacco and tomato crops were introduced and sold in China and have been, controversially, around ever since. Genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, according to the World Health Organization, are foods derived from organisms whose genetic material has been modified through genetic engineering. Since the first time genetically modified foods were introduced in the 1980's, there has been a debate on whether or not these alien foods are harmful to our health. According to Jeffrey Smith, author of the book Seeds of Deception, in Another Reason for Schools to Ban Genetically Engineered Foods, he states, “Gene insertion creates unpredicted, irreversible changes” (486). Clearly, the uncertainty for
Many have concerns about future birth defects due to genetically modified foods. Information from many of the experiments give reasons to fear harmful side-effects, such as the test of Roundup Ready’s soy product when given to mice before conception. Over “56% died within three weeks compared to 9% from non-GM soy controls”(Smith). Additionally, the researchers tested two mice who were both fed genetically modified food trying to conceive and were unable to. The main ideas for the Ital diet is to “eat natural foods that are good for you”(Myers).
Do those people who consume organic foods considered to be higher up than those who don’t purchase it? Scientists are motivated to study the GM food safety issue because they can raise the awareness and persuade people to accept GM crops and foods since no scientific reports proven that they bring harms to human. It may then change people’s views to understand
