Eventually things turn for the worst when The Boston Massacre occurred where the colonist surrounded a group of British Troops stationed in Boston. The British troops fired into the crowed which killed 5 people. This did not sit well with the colonist as there was already tension between the two parties. This was considered the start of the revolution; the colonist was already not happy with the rules that the British was imposing on them. Soon after the colonist began to revolt against the government, which led to the Boston Tea party affair where a group of people led by Samuel Admas poured tea into the Boston Harbor because the colonists did not want to pay taxes for the tea.
This is a political conflict that has been composed on all of the colonists and confusion, hate, and anger started to broil. This is especially shown in the document when it states “She protected us from those who had no quarrel with us on any other account, and who will now always be our enemies on the same account----because of her!” This proves that England protected the colonies from countries they had no setback with whatsoever, and now the countries became upset because of the protection. This shows that England worsened the relationships between them and other colonies/countries. Which affects the colonists politically because they no longer had a source of trade between other countries, which unfolds to the king taking their rights away.
One loud shot was fired, leaving everyone with the question of “who fired first,” The Revolutionary War had begun. The American colonist were unquestionably right in waging war and breaking away from Britain. The colonist no longer wanted to be under Britain's strong mercantilist. Conflict had rose between the mother country and the colonist. The American colonist were justified in waging and breaking away from Britain because of taxes, treatment, and mercantilism.
The conflict quickly becoming known as “The Bloody Massacre” or “The Boston Massacre”; it fanned the flames of anger to the British, and was one of the main reasons the Revolution started. The eight British soldiers, and their captain, Thomas Preston, were all given trials, their lawyer being John Adams, future president. Adams claimed that the colonists were an angry, unorganized mob, that forced his clients to open fire on them. According to Adams, Attucks was leading the fight, though constant debate raged about how he was involved in it. Samuel Adams said that Attucks was simply “leaning on a stick” when the firing started.
And it is true that, in 1775 and 1776, the Americans had presented the king with formal appeals for reconciliation. These peaceful pleas were met with armed military force and several violations of British Common Law and the English Bill of Rights. In 1770, the British fired upon unarmed citizens in the Boston Massacre. At Lexington, the command was “Don’t fire unless fired upon.” The colonists, therefore, saw their actions as simply defending themselves after the conflict had been initiated by the
This act of violence is believed to have escalated from a dispute and fight over a bill for a wig that a British officer was accused of not paying. But tensions had been on the rise since the British had quartered two regiments in Boston in September 1768. The troops were sent because of issue with customs
The colonists believed that these laws violated their rights. All this conflict caused King George III to compromise that either Britain masters the colonies or they leave them. General Gage, military leader of the French and Indian War, became the new British commander and the new governor of Massachusetts. This all happened in
Then, the colonists started violently acting out which led to the Boston Massacre- a street fight against the colonists and the British
pennsylvania history 306 militias and Susquehannock Indians in 1675, it proceeds through severalstages: Nathaniel Bacon’s mobilization of extralegal volunteers, GovernorBerkeley’s denunciation of these rebels, and the outbreak of full-scale civilwar. Rice summarizes important background information in expositoryasides, which connect his narrative to the broader social, economic, politi-cal, and diplomatic questions of the day. He places particular emphasis onthe class conflict between wealthy planters and poor settlers, as well as theincreasingly precarious position of Native Americans in the Chesapeake. But Rice focuses on the storytelling, moving rapidly through the unfoldingevents. As might be expected from the author of Nature and History in the Potomac Country
Before the Boston massacre we had the Townshend Acts in 1768. Lord Townshend was in charge of raising revenue in a way that wouldn 't upset the colonist. Which in their eyes will be a external tax rather than an internal tax such as the stamp act. They are going to charge for imported and manufactured goods from Great Britain. Such as paper, paint, glass and led.
The colonists had every reason to resent the guard. This guard, amongst others, had been sent from England to patrol the streets. The standing army that the king has sent to protect us has done nothing except instill fear. Within a few moments more people began throwing things
There were many disagreements and because of those, many events were the cause of the American Revolution. These events included bloodshed by others, peoples rights weren’t enforced, individuals didn’t receive freedom, and our country was just not yet whole. Despite of the causes of why the road to Revolution took place there were effects afterwards. When American Revolution was over with the The Declaration of Independence came into place, treaties were signed, and the Bill of Rights. Now these effects/events were amazing, it helped our country tremendously.
The Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.
Tensions were high in Boston between the British and the Colonists. Between the Boston Massacre in 1770 and the Boston Tea Party in 1773, Britain was very upset with Boston. King George III, the Lord North- led British government and many of the British citizens were very upset and irritated when they found out that the Boston colonists had made “Tea with salt water”. Once the parliament heard of their escapade, they began thinking of a way to insure that there would be no more uprisings in the Massachusetts colony.
The colonists and England had trouble with each others as the colonists developed on their own as time went on. Great Britain and her North American colonies originally conflicted over economic issues rather than political and social controversies and differences. According to document 2, it’s stated that colonists were allowed to have all their rights and did not have to pay taxes passed by the government. This proved that the issue was not originally based on politics as they had all their freedom.
