Arguments in film and production show what points are made by what characters. Different characters are gonna have different approaches, depending on what they stand by or believe in. In the Musical Hamilton, two songs show evidence of The Cabinet Battles and how Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had different approaches to the situations at hand. To begin, in Cabinet Battle #1, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton are arguing to the cabinet members about Hamilton's new financial plan. Hamilton created a financial plan for America after the Revolutionary War, because they had become severely in debt after fighting Great Britain. Hamilton had a drawn out plan that Jefferson did not agree with, stating that assuming state debts …show more content…
France was about to go to war with England. During the American Revolution, America signed a treaty with France and King Louis, stating that they would pay for America’s war expenses, as long as America would lend a hand in the future against impending wars. King Louis was killed before this issue occurred, but Thomas believes we should still stay loyal to France, although their King is dead. He believes we should still follow the treaty. Alexander's counterargument states that going to battle is pointless and unnecessary, and would destroy America. He thinks that staying loyal to a dead King is idiotic. For example, Thomas states, “In return, they didn’t ask for land, only a promise that we’d lend a hand and stand with them if they fought against oppressors, and revolution is messy but now is the time to stand. Stand with our brothers as they fight against tyranny.” (Miranda). This shows that Thomas is eager to help France, and wants to hold his side of the agreement up. However, Alexander states, “We signed a treaty with a King whose head is now in a basket. Would you like to take it out and ask?” (Miranda). Alexander believes that going back to war after just recovering from another war is gonna further hurt America, and that they shouldn’t help them and forget about the treaty. Alexander brings his fear and sarcasm into the argument. He’s afraid of what may happen if they hold up and end the bargain that doesn’t count anymore. To conclude, in Cabinet Battle #2, Thomas believes that the nation's loyalty to France must stay as it is, and they should help them fight, while Hamilton believes that the nation itself just got over the Revolutionary War, and that going to war again would destroy
• When Adams became president, the dispute with France carried over. The French looked at Jay’s Treaty as an American attempt to help the British in the war with France. To punish the U.S., the French took American ships that carried cargo to Brittan. During the fall of 1797, Adams sent a delegation to France with the hopes to end the dispute. The French foreign master wouldn’t meet with the Americans and instead demanded a bribe and loan from the Americans.
During the debate between Hamilton and Jefferson regarding the Bank of the United States, both used the elastic clause (Article 1, Section 8, clause 18) and the tenth amendment in the preamble as justification to their positions. When Alexander Hamilton presented his Report on a National Bank to Congress, he had specific proposals in his plan for his bank, which is what caused a great rift between Hamilton and Jefferson. The main proposals Hamilton had that was refuted by Jefferson were based along the lines of the worth of the bank's stock, the shares sold at a pricing of $400 per share, how the bank would be run by its elected board, and its ability to establish offices in other cities. The reasoning as to why Jefferson was so opposed to
“Speech to the Virginia Convention” was the famous speech both written and argued by Patrick Henry in March of 1775. This statement managed to catapult the countrymen of the west, and declare war against the British forces and ultimately gain their freedom and independence. Henry’s view about the use of war to maintain freedom often has many ways of being interpreted. Why must Henry hastily look to war as a means of solving their problem with the British? As a matter of fact, in Henry’s speech, he believes that they have exercised all possible options to maintain peace and have been too passive and must take firm action.
During the war between France and Britain in 1793, the U.S. decided to remain neutral. However, the Jay’s Treaty is what infuriates the French government. After the U.S. and Britain signed the treaty and recognized Britain as the most favored nation trading status, the French became annoyed and seized U.S. merchant ships. They also refused to receive Charles Cotesworth Pinckney from George Washington as a minister to France. After John Adams became president in 1797, he sends John Marshall and Elbridge Gerry along with Charles to restore peace from France.
Two of Washington’s Cabinet: Secretary of Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, and Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton and Jefferson were quarreling over everything from having a strong government that would be wealthy, knowledgeable people, or not having a strong government at all. They had argued on the payments of national and state debts, a tariff on imported goods, manufacturing or farming, a national bank, interpretation of the Constitution, Whiskey Tax and the Whiskey Rebellion, and the whether the Support on the French Revolution. Some believe because of Jefferson and Hamilton’s differences is why that Washington had picked them both to advise him. Jefferson and Hamilton had argued over the government.
This also goes to show how Hamilton wanted to make peace with burr and stop fighting to solve the problems between them and make peace. These are two different ways of characterization but it will be explained how these two can be put together in the next
When comparing the viewpoints of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, the views of Jefferson tend to be more favorable than that of Hamilton. One can say Jefferson prevailed Hamilton because of his theories that are relative to the poor, as Hamilton’s views were supported by the wealthy. Jefferson’s beliefs were mainly supported by the working class such as small farmers and shopkeepers, as Hamilton’s supporters were wealthy farmers and merchants. The reason why one would favor Jefferson’s beliefs rather than Hamilton’s is because Jefferson’s theories were socially constructed well. Jefferson’s belief was that he “Had deep faith in the common people” and “Believed that individual liberties must be protected.”
Hamilton in 1793. Jefferson saw that upholding the treaties with France as an act of honor and diplomatic neutrality. At this point in history, the United Sates had very little room to break treaties or make political enemies. Jefferson and others believed that retracing from the treaties would only be seen as an act of favoritism towards the British. Jefferson also stated that “ to make it void would require an act of election, but to let it go on requires only that we should do nothing, and doing nothing can hardly be an infraction of peace or neutrality” (64).
Thomas revealed in this document, a somewhat relief and heroically defeated reply, he expressed that he feared that America would not become what he visioned, but next seemed to accept it. Since he was near death, he could not stand for his belief and that is was to be thrown away “by the unwise and unworthy passions of their
Hamilton interpreted it loosely while Jefferson was strict. This led to an argument about whether the creation of a national bank was constitutional; Hamilton stated it was while Jefferson claimed it wasn’t. Another issue that they clashed
After a series of “paper wars” between the political opponents, Burr challenged Hamilton to a duel, which Hamilton accepted. According to Freeman, Hamilton accepted Burr’s challenge for a number of reasons. “In his mind, the duel; was a praiseworthy attempt to serve the common good... yet it was also an intensely personal attempt to preserve his public career. To prove to the world, and to himself, that he was a man of his word, a man of courage and principle, a leader.”
This is conveyed by Washington’s correspondence with Hamilton. Hamilton began his decline when Washington died. Freed of the tempered restraining influence of Washington, Hamilton’s judgment faltered. At this point, the book became almost unbearably sad. Hamilton engaged in a number of political feuds with Adams, Jefferson, Madison, and others that clouded his perspective.
His goal was to make the ordinary man's voice be heard, and not be overshadowed by the wealthy class. He believed that class and status had no place in determining a person's leadership skills. Jefferson did not want America to become the next Great Britain. Unlike Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson wanted a stronger state government and more emphasis on the Constitution. He felt that agriculture should be the main focus of the nation.
Jefferson explains some of the King’s actions to make them submit to him. These are some of the reason why the Colonist have decided to break their bonds with Britain. Another example is: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.
Hamilton 's monetary course of action for the nation included working up a national bank like that in England to keep up open credit; cementing the states ' commitments under the focal government; and initiating guarded tolls and government enrichments to empower American makes. These measures fortified the administration 's vitality to the hindrance of the states. Jefferson and his political accomplices limited these progressions. Francophile Jefferson expected that the Bank of the United States addressed an inordinate measure of English effect, and he battled that the Constitution did not give Congress the capacity to set up a bank. He didn 't assume that propelling produces was as basic as supporting the authoritatively settled agrarian base.