ipl-logo

The Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

607 Words3 Pages

Introduction How would you feel if you incriminated yourself because you were not advised of your rights? In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was interrogated by police for two hours before providing a written confession to kidnap and rape. The cops not only failed and tricked Miranda by never advising him of his rights, but the jury and the Supreme Court of Arizona also failed him. Miranda's case had a huge impact on law enforcement and the future of law enforcement to this day.
Stance and Verdict Miranda not being advised of his rights and his written confession led to him being tried twice. Miranda was found guilty by the jury and the Supreme Court of Arizona with them stating that “Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated because he did not specifically request counsel” (Oyez). Miranda's conviction was then …show more content…

His conviction was later overturned by the Supreme Court and after being retried without his confession as evidence, he was found guilty. Not only did Miranda's case change the way officers have to read suspects' rights now, but it also changed the way they must go about the process altogether. Miranda never deserved to go through all of this just so the cops could get a simple confession.
References
McBride, A. (2006, December). The Supreme Court . expanding civil rights . landmark cases . Miranda v. Arizona (1966): PBS. The Supreme Court . Expanding Civil Rights . Landmark Cases . Miranda v. Arizona (1966) | PBS. Retrieved January 14, 2023, from https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/supremecourt/rights/landmark_miranda.html
Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Its impact on interrogations. Kennesaw State University. (n.d.). Retrieved January 14, 2023, from https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=mscj_etd
Miranda v. Arizona. (n.d.). Oyez. Retrieved January 14, 2023, from

Show More
Related

  • Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study

    1196 Words  | 5 Pages

    The decision of The Supreme court for Miranda V. Arizona addressed 4 separate trials. In the Miranda V. Arizona trial while he was being questioned he had no contact with the outside world. In the trial he was not told all of his rights. The questioning brought about oral statements, three of which, were signed statements that were disclosed at trial. Miranda was arrested at his house where he was then taken to the police station, and identified by an witness.

    Read More

  • Missouri V. Seibert Case Study

    442 Words  | 2 Pages

    • Missouri v. Seibert- (2004) A decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that struck down the police practice of first obtaining an inadmissible confession without giving Miranda warnings, then issuing the warnings, and then obtaining a second confession. • Moran v. Burbine- (1986) the respondent was apprehended by police for murder. While in custody, but before any arraignment proceedings, the respondent waived his right to counsel and confessed to the crimes.

    Read More

  • Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study

    272 Words  | 2 Pages

    Facts: In this case, a 23-year-old man named Ernesto Miranda was arrested at his home in Phoenix, Arizona, and taken to the police station for questioning about a rape and kidnapping. The police questioned him for two hours, and were able to get a written confession out of Miranda. The confession was used in court as evidence during the trial. Miranda was found guilty of rape and kidnapping and was sentenced between twenty to thirty years in prison for each count. The Arizona Supreme Court confirmed the conviction and Miranda’s case was sent to the U.S Supreme Court.

    Read More

  • Ernesto Miranda Legal Brief

    1061 Words  | 5 Pages

    Retrieved January 20, 2023, from https://drive.google.com/file/d/16QNlgiwMeKIoD6viO74z2gVF-x64l_iu/view History.com Editors. (2009, November 9). Miranda Rights. HISTORY. https://www.history.com/topics/united-states-constitution/miranda-rights mcbride.

    Read More

  • Miranda V. Arizona Case Study

    682 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although Miranda wrote on a paper stating that he was aware of his legal rights. His lawyers are claiming that he was not in fact fully aware of his legal rights so his confession should not be deemed valid to be used against him in

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

    744 Words  | 3 Pages

    The justice system changed by this case because, the prosecution may not utilize proclamations, regardless of whether exculpatory or inculpatory, originating from custodial cross examination of the respondent unless it shows the utilization of procedural protections powerful to secure the benefit against self-implication. “The apex of the individual-rights emphasis in Supreme Court decisions was reached in the 1966 case of Miranda v. Arizona, which established the famous requirement of a police “rights advisement” of suspects” (Schmalleger, 2018, p. 198). Furthermore the miranda rights are now included in the 5th

    Read More

  • Miranda V. Arizona Supreme Court Case In Phoenix, Arizona

    1106 Words  | 5 Pages

    That is the reason why they made the Miranda rights so it would help the accused and now the police are required to inform the accused what rights he or she has. In my case in Phoenix, Arizona on March, 1963 Ernesto

    Read More

  • Case Study On Miranda Vs Arizona

    1407 Words  | 6 Pages

    In summary, the Sixth Amendment described that an individual must have personal liberties to have a fair trial after they are in custody. The decision made by the Supreme came down to a five-four vote favoring with Miranda. After the whole process of appealing and ending up on top, the reward is getting a retrial, this time, without the evidence of the confession paper. Due to the other solid evidence they had against Miranda besides the confession paper, Miranda was still found guilty. With Miranda’s case making it all the way to the Supreme Court, it still has a huge impact our legal system as of

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Miranda V. Arizona

    845 Words  | 4 Pages

    The police officers told Miranda that he was not obligated to have an attorney present. After two hours of being in custody he signed a statement admitting that he knows the full knowledge of his right and anything from the statement can be used against him. His statement went to a jury at his trial where he was found guilty and was sentenced to prison. The Arizona supreme court did not think that Miranda’s rights were

    Read More

  • Miranda V. Arizona Case Study

    893 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Miranda v. Arizona” is a case that was presented in the high court in the United States of America. The case addresses four distinct cases that may be considered identical. Each of the four cases involved defendants who were interrogated by the police officers, prosecuting attorney or detectives where they were forced to give information about various crimes committed as they were identified as the suspects. Miranda, who was a Mexican immigrant, was identified by a Phoenix woman as one of the perpetrators who kidnapped and raped her. This resulted to an arrest that was followed by a police interrogation that was carried out for two hours (Vander, & Kamisar, 2013).

    Read More

  • Alito's Attack On Miranda Warnings Is Worse Than It Seems By Mark Stern

    1486 Words  | 6 Pages

    Through the disclosure of rights and encouragement of legal counsel, Miranda warnings provide a suspect with the opportunity to have legal representation to help protect them from unintentional or involuntary confessions. Legal representatives can provide protection against deceitful interrogation and potential violations of their rights. The second reason I support the argument is that Miranda V. Arizona prevents susceptible individuals from being influenced by forceful or deceitful interrogation tactics that aim to manipulate suspects into providing information or confessions. In many situations, police officers and other law enforcement officials will attempt to lie and manipulate a detainee into providing information.

    Read More

  • Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    1588 Words  | 7 Pages

    One of the most important Supreme Court cases throughout history was that of Miranda vs. Arizona. The case was seen to prove that the confession of Ernesto Miranda in 1963 was inadmissible as evidence because Miranda was not informed of his rights. This case came at the same time as a national push for individual rights and civil liberties. The 1960’s were a decade predicated on increasing awareness of police misconduct and abuse of power. During this period, there was also a growing feeling that suspects were often treated unfairly by both law enforcement and the court system.

    Read More

  • Arizona Vs Miranda Essay

    829 Words  | 4 Pages

    The legal case of Arizona v. Miranda, which took place in 1966, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that had a profound impact on criminal procedure in the country. The case involved Ernesto Miranda, a man who had been arrested and charged with kidnapping and rape in Phoenix, Arizona. The overall issue of the case was the admissibility of the confession that Miranda had made to the police during his interrogation, which had been obtained without informing him of his constitutional rights. The court ultimately ruled that Miranda's confession could not be used as evidence against him, as the police had violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This decision led to the creation of what today is known

    Read More

  • Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    890 Words  | 4 Pages

    Arizona, Were his rights violated? It is obvious that Ernesto 's rights were not clear to him. Before his interrogation, Miranda was unaware of his rights and when he made his confession, they were entirely thrown out. In 1965, the court agreed to heir his case. Miranda 's case won 5-4 and a statement was made.

    Read More

  • The Miranda Warning

    856 Words  | 4 Pages

    If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense.” So, the Miranda ruling requires that, prior to any questioning, a person who is in police custody must be warned that: 1. They have the right to remain silent. 2.

    Read More

More about The Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

Open Document