It is quite common in our life that when people are admiring a movie star, when would try their best to mimic his actions. For example, people would imitate his ways of walking or his accents when he is talking. Or, when we are talking to somebody, if his ways of talking or some of actions are really similar to us, we would feel affection from him or her. Why would this kind of situation happen? An experiment which perfectly showed this phenomenon was done by Chartrand and Bargh in 1999, who showed there is a natural tendency for people to mimic other people’s behaviors which is known as Chameleon Effect.[ Bernard Carl Rosen 2001 Masks and Mirrors: Generation X and the Chameleon Personality p13-14] In 1999, two psychologists in New York University decided to research the question that whether people would automatically copy other people’s actions even they are strangers? Whether doing such actions would enhance their affection between each other and whether people who tend to open to others will display such kind of actions more than others? The first experiment they did is they found 78 people and each person who have a talk face to face with the confederate. The confederate would employ different kinds of actions during the talking, such as smiling, touching their face, shaking the leg, foot waggling etc. Confederate would observe tester’s behavior, to see whether they would imitate his behaviors. Then they did the second experiment, in order to know whether imitating
Adriana Umana Psych 356 13 December 2015 Final Exam Much of what we know about human behavior has been known thanks to many psychology theories. Some of these theories have been developed by very well known psychologists such as Carl Rogers, B.F Skinner, Bandura, and Raymond Cattell. Although, some theories have changed over time there are others we still apply today. Carl Rogers was a humanistic psychologist. He was non directed, client centered, and person centered.
Such as Staples’ anecdotes, however; we ourselves originate personalities for others just as quickly as them. Strangers maneuver the first impression of the individual, give off and vice-versa. Toni Morrison’s “Strangers” also presents a valid point, “The resources available to us for benign access to each other, for vaulting the mere blue air that separates us, are a few but powerful: language, image, and experience, which may involve both, one, or neither of the first two… Provoking language or eclipsing it, an image can determine not only what we know and feel but also what we believe.” (Morrison 78).
The immediate community around people is the important reason that people act in the certain ways. Usually, what people being like at society is not what they are actually being like as themselves. From their immediate communities, people gain the impressions society gives to them. Some people may misunderstand themselves through being at the society; some people may become selfish by seeing other people act selfishly. Overall, people are changing when context is changing.
The book Bridges Not Walls: A book about interpersonal communication Stewart identifies how communication shape and define who we are. In this reflective journal entry, I will use the quote “Identities are multidimensional and changing” (Stewart, 2012). Over the course of our life, we grow physically and mentally however some people like to believe the infamous quote “that’s just how I am” when someone is trying to assist them in growing their personal identity. That is a dangerous statement because it is proven that our identities are constantly changing with society.
In Lisa Ko's article, “An American Woman Quits Smiling,” Ko discusses her frustration at being told to smile, even when she didn’t feel like it, which leads her into deciding to stop smiling at people for a day and evaluating people’s reactions. She would only smile if it’s by her own will. The demands to follow a certain practice from the majority connects with the topic of conformity that’s within the field of social psychology. Conformity is the idea that an individual will change in order to fit the norms of a group. It’s consistent with that being obligated to smile sheds light on how cultural expectations will pressure people to follow just a simple act because it’s a good thing and that everyone else is doing it.
From the outward appearance of others to their internal
He saw that the more personal, or close, the real participant had to be to the fake one, while they were being shocked, affected the obedience as well. He also noticed that if there were two other fake participants teaching that refused to shock their learners that the real participant would not comply. Finally, he tested the experimenter telling the real patient to shock the learner by telephone, instead of actually being there in person, reduced obedience as well (McLead). The Milgram experiment and the Nuremburg trials can relate extensively to explain how the Holocaust happened the way it did.
In the novel I’d Tell You I Love you, But Then I’d Have To Kill You, the central character and narrator Cammie Morgan, “The Chameleon”, is a student at the Gallagher Academy for Exceptional Young Women in Roseville, Virginia, where her mom is the headmistress and Cammie and her friends are trained to be spies, whereas everyone in Roseville thinks the school is just for rich, haughty girls who have no other place to go. Cammie and her friends are sophomores who have to take a class called Covert Operations, taught by Cammie’s late father’s friend Joe Solomon, whom everyone is swooning over; Mr. Solomon teaches them to be real spies, instead of just memorizing facts and knowing 14 languages. Cammie and her friend Bex introduce the famous McHenrys to Gallagher Academy;
Then, the participants were fully debriefed about the situation and how no physical harm was inflicted. Generally, “the obedience experiments produced a disturbing view of human behavior” (Blass, Print). The procedure heavily relied on the experimenter because the participant, upon instinct, chose to turn to them when in doubt or when showing nervousness. They were always commanded to continue the
Firstly, in order for Milgram’s experiment to work the people had to obey and do what the researchers told them to do. The definition of obedience defined in the book is, “...a compliance with higher authorities in a hierarchical structure. ”(Schaefer, 103) This is exactly what happened in the experiment.
The Milgram experiment was conducted to analyze obedience to authority figures. The experiment was conducted on men from varying ages and varying levels of education. The participants were told that they would be teaching other participants to memorize a pair of words. They believed that this was an experiment that was being conducted to measure the effect that punishment has on learning, because of this they were told they had to electric shock the learner every time that they answered a question wrong. The experiment then sought out to measure with what willingness the participants obeyed the authority figure, even when they were instructed to commit actions which they seemed uncomfortable with.
Stanley Milgram wants to know how people would go in obeying an instruction. For his experiment he stand a procedure it is different from others. His experiment taken at human beings. 40 males aged between 20 and 50 were selected for the experiment, These 40 males were professionals who is unskilled. There is a teacher and learner in his experiment.
There had been experimentation on obedience but none had been done like Milgram’s. The experimenter warns, “In this experiment, one of you will be the learner and receive shocks when you make a mistake in word pairs read to you, and the other one will be the teacher and administer the shocks when the word pair repetition is wrong.” (Slater 33). He wanted to see if people would shock a person continuously because someone had told them to. Milgram wanted to know how far people would go.
What this theory engages with is the assumption that the engagement of behavior begins after the observation of similar behaviors in others. (Wong,
How do relationships with others show our true personality? The way we communicate with others, views how people see us. In the story “ What of this Goldfish do you wish?” by Etgar Keret’s. Shirley Jackson’s “ The Lottery” and Diane Glancy’s “ Without Title”.