The Death Penalty Is Still Necessary Essay

1718 Words7 Pages

The jury stares at the criminal from across the room. They are coming up with the final verdict that will change the criminal’s life forever. What if you had the power in your hands to decide whether the criminal is going to have a life that will change, or no life at all? Capital punishment has been a political debate for years because people argue whether or not the punishment is humane or if it deters crime. I believe the death penalty should be continued because it deters crime, and serves proper justice for the victims, as well as their families.
The mentality of the people who support the death penalty is, “If you take a life, you give your life in order to rightfully repent for the crime you have committed”. The article, “Why The Death Penalty is Still Necessary” by Edward Feser and Joseph M. Bessette explains that religion can play a factor in this belief due to the Catholic Church teachings saying the death penalty was a legitimate punishment for heinous crimes by saying, “Thus, punishment is fundamentally retributive, inflicting on the offender a penalty commensurate with the gravity of his crime, though it may serve other purposes as well, such as incapacitating the …show more content…

There is no evidence whether or not the criminal being put under lethal injection is going through pain or not. The article “Five Reasons to Abolish the Death Penalty” by Amnesty International speaks out about why they think the death penalty is inhumane by speaking about the execution of Angel Nieves Diaz that took thirty-four minutes, and required two doses of the lethal injection. (Amnesty International 2). This can explain why people do not support the death penalty because they expect it to be as quick and painless as possible so the victim does not have to suffer, but only give their life for which they were asked

Open Document