While analyzing the nature of American stimulus, Scott Russell Sanders proclaimed, “But who would pretend that a history of migration has immunized the United States against bigotry?” (Sanders 40). Sanders was a firm believer that America had transformed into a state of take-and-abandon. He made several observations and analogies that highlighted the privation of conservatism. Sanders saw that when people fished a stream, they did not fish it with concern for population of the fish, they fished it until not a fish was left, before moving on to the next stream; when a farmer utilized a field, rather than caring for the field, when the soil quality dropped, the farmer would find somewhere new to settle. Both of the prior are illustrations of …show more content…
One of his arguments parallels the pursuit for capital gain with insouciance to the toll imposed upon the land: “The Dust Bowl of the 1930s was caused not by drought but by the transfer onto the Great Plains of farming methods that were suitable to wetter regions” (Sanders 56). Here, Sanders highlights a great cost of a recklessness most don’t even consider. He shows that often times, people don’t realize how much they’re hurting the land. By bringing up the great Dust Bowl, Sanders reminds his audience of the emotional distraught, the terror, and the destruction wrought by the cost of constantly moving for personal gain. Through this quote, he leaves the thought of plausible disaster that follows their selfish desires. In another claim, Sanders strives for his audience to inquire against their own ideals: “...even though our sprawling system of interstate highways is crumbling, the president has decided that we should triple it in size, and all without raising our taxes a nickel. Only a populace drunk on driving…could hear such a proposal without hooting” (Sanders 20). Through this quote, Sanders attempts to reason with his audience’s morals. Although the audience may have not realized it initially, Sanders points out: why do they need to expand upon an already massive highway system, when most of it is already …show more content…
Sanders argues, “Lord knows we could do with less nationalism (to say nothing of its ugly siblings, racism, religious sectarianism, or class snobbery)” (Sanders 37). Here, Sanders makes claims about nationalism that likely contradicted what Americans may have thought at the time. People of the time pursued the idea of the American Dream: a nationwide concept that one should do whatever it takes to pursue happiness and success. However, what the populace was blind to were the sins orbiting the concept. Sanders makes the point that by pursuing this level of nationalism, one is treading down a dark path of racism and greed. Sanders goes on to say, “But who would pretend that a history of migration has immunized the United States against bigotry? And even if, by uprooting ourselves, we shed our chauvinism, is that all we lose?” (Sanders 40). Through this quote, Sanders proclaims how Americans abuse their multicultural descent to justify acts of racism and deceit. Once again, he illustrates a scenario where Americans mindlessly take until they must leave: the corruption of their own patriotism. Sanders shows that in reconciliation to the tarnishing of American nationalism, Americans merely broadened their horizons and moved to new places to forget their sins, just like the scenarios with the fish and the fields, and the great Dust Bowl, rather than being conservative and
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Dust Bowl, The Southern Plains in the 30’s written by Donald Worster and published in 1979, is an informative text on the Great Plains during the Great Depression. Donald Worster is a credible author because he not only earned a Ph.D. from Yale in environmental history, but he also had previously written a book on the environment and the economy. This book was written well and Worster did a good job of revealing how people and how they live have effected the areas environment. He spoke of places including, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Kansas and many more.
As the Great War raged on, people began fleeing their war torn homelands. Immigrants flooded into the United States at a breakneck pace. The way of life for all civilians was dramatically altered as their husbands and baby boys were shipped overseas to fight. Immigrants that were thrown into the fray of the developing United States faced the most drastic change to their lives during World War I.
The Dust Bowl is the worst storm in the time period of the 1930s. ¨Dirty Thirties¨ as they call it was a really dark windy sandy place. Before the Dust bowl it was a dry dusty place that people could not see when they plowed to plant crops. The people caught in the Dust Bowl were impacted greatly because the dust killed their crops and made it really dark, so laws were made to prevent this from happening again.
This passage is relevant to its historical context, due to the time the novel is taking place is corresponding with the Dust Bowl period. Furthermore, the author states, the Western States are nervous due to a tremendous amount of people are migrating over to their location in hope to find work, however what the people don 't know is that the Dust Bowl is a national crisis. Hence, the Western States don’t know how to react to such an formidable change, being that they don 't know how it 's going to impact them economically, and what are the outcomes going to be. Lastly, the excerpt contains relevant information with its historical context the Dust Bowl, creating a realistic setting, and
Dust Bowl and Economics of the 1930s The Dust Bowl was a very desperate and troublesome time for America. The southwestern territories were in turmoil due to the arid effect of the drought causing no fertile soils. As the rest of America was being dragged along with the stock market crash and higher prices of wheat and crops since the producing areas couldn't produce. This was a streak of bad luck for the Americans as they were in a deep despair for a quite some time.
The invention of the tractor appealed to farmers all over the United States, and they plowed through way more than a healthy amount of grass. The drought of the 1930’s cut off lots of potential grass growth. And the lack of grass let dirt into the air. The Dust Bowl was a terrible time that affected all of America, and it could have been stopped if we hadn’t been so careless. We can’t change the past, but let's try and learn from our mistakes to make a better
The Dust Bowl was an economic event that happened in the Great Plains during the Great Depression in the 1930’s. The causes of the Dust Bowl was the dry farming technique, the drought, and high winds. The dry farming technique helped the farmers grow more food in the Great Plains because the land was somewhat dry. The drought made the soil loose, and turn into a powdery substance. The high winds started blowing in 1934, which carried the dirt through the air.
Ever heard of the Dust Bowl? “The Dust Bowl was a period of severe dust storms that really damaged the agriculture of the US and during the 1930s. The Dust Bowl was a severe drought that has started to ruin the agriculture. When this happened the states including Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Colorado and New Mexico were affected.” ( John Steinbeck ).
The Historical Significance of the Dust Bowl In one of the most fertile places in the United States, one of the nation's worst disasters occurred, the Dust Bowl. It began when an area in the Midwest was severely affected by an intense drought throughout the 1930s or what proceeded to be called the Dirty Thirties. The drought killed crops that had kept the rich soil in place, and when the strong root system was not there the soil was not kept grounded. Due to the soil left with no crops, the high and strong winds blew the topsoil away.
Diction and Tone Kennedy and Quindlen’s tone and diction in their essays make their writing better. They both use it to Reflect their audience, purpose and message. These two authors both talk about the same topic, American voices, but they have some similarities and differences. One way that Quindlen and Kennedy have similar tone and diction is by their message.
In the essays “A Quilt in a Country” by Anna Quindlen and in “The Immigrant Contribution” by John F. Kennedy, the two authors shared their point of view on America and it’s people. Quindlen viewed America as a mongrel nation because of it’s ever changing disparate parts. Kennedy viewed America as a nation made up of immigrants. Anna Quindlen’s view Is similar to Kennedy’s by how they both see that America is not like any other nation because we are made up of different ethnic groups. Say you were in Britain you would see brits.
“With the gales came the dust. Sometimes it was so thick that it completely hid the sun. Visibility ranged from nothing to fifty feet, the former when the eyes were filled with dirt which could not be avoided, even with goggles ”( Richardson 59). The Dust Bowl was a huge dust storm in the 1930s that stretched from western Kansas to New Mexico. People that lived in that area could not step outside or they would get dust in their lungs.
His argument is that the farmers in the Southern Plains are more concerned with turning a profit than the land or what they are doing to it. According to Worster, these farmers only view the land as only having commercial value. By only seeing the land as having monetary value, the farmers of the Southern Plains continued to exploit the land and its resources. This over farming is a result of a capitalist need to cultivate the earth in order to achieve a maximum profit. Worster hints that capitalism is the root of all the problems during the Dust Bowl and is often mentioned throughout the book.
One becomes and American by forgetting ways or “prejudices” that keep them from receiving a grand position on the “lap of our great Alma Mater.” He writes that the labors performed by the countrymen aid in earning the title freeman. All of the title holders have received ample rewards and benefit from “wanting a vegetative mold.” He believes that the diversity of the freemen here will and should cause tremendous changes to the world.
America’s identity is defined differently by every individual. Ideally it was to be a place of freedom and acceptance, identified by its message of liberty and hard-work, however the question arises whether America is a melting pot in which only one culture dominates or it a mosaic of many peoples’ histories. America’s potential and true identity lies within its ability to assimilate and create a natural individualism despite race, class, and immigration standing. A country as powerful and influential as America is within industry, politics, and socioeconomics cannot be abstract in definition.