The Fakebook Generation Summary

Social media connects us to so much but leaves us disconnected from reality. My generation and I have played into this social media world where we worry more about how many likes, views, and interactions we get on a daily basis to make us feel connected. The author Nick Bilton, writes “Disruptions: More Connected, Yet More Alone” which was published in 2013 in the New York Times. The author argues that we as a society tend to overuse social media in a way which can be perceived as downright dystopian. Bilton starts building his main points with personal facts and credibility, factually based data and reasoning, and conveying how ethics and emotion play in our social media crazed society.

Rose does a fantastic job in building a bridge to create trust for his targeted readers, using many examples. The ethos that really stands out from the article is when rose states, “social media simultaneously draws us nearer and distances us” (174). This can be a tremendous problem, causing people to ignore the ones closest to them, since meeting in person would be an easier task than the ones far away. Today many people deal with this situation, whether it’s family or friends, causing them to distance from each other, even though they are significantly close. It gives a strong understanding to why Rose believes social media does give a negative impact to humans by building a wall between the ones closest to each other.

Not everyone that a person once associated with still lives in close proximity to said person and thus allows for people to reconnect with people from all parts of the globe that have access to internet. Jurgenson illustrates the notion that people putting photos and scribing statuses on platforms such as Facebook are engaging acts of validity, thus proving that a said someone’s online life is “real”. Furthermore, sharing something on the internet is not just for online friends or showing someone “pics or it didn’t happen”

This chapter of Reclaiming Conversation by Sherry Turkle essentially focused on the effect technology can have on the bond of a family. The writer depicts different families to prove how social media has creates a false sense of closeness in family relations, when in reality it drives us further apart. As explained in the section named “Left to their own devices”, a teenager named Alli finds herself in a situation most families are currently in. Alli is not able to rely on her family for emotional support and instead seeks comfort from thousands of strangers online. This is a common situation in which teenagers feel more comfortable going out of their way on social media to obtain advice from strangers, instead of having a conversation with

Whether it’s teens, kids, or adults, people uses electronics and social media daily. Electronic devices are a part of everyday life. From tablets to laptops, whether it’s for education or for entertainment. It can be a positive or negative thing depending on the person using it. In the article “Antisocial Networking?”, Hilary Stout argues that social media has a poor effect on kids’ fragile mind.

he asked. ‘That’s my family.’”(page 46). In contrast, the society today is accepting of various levels of social interaction and it is still justifiable to have face-to-face communication. Still, in this case we may have more in common than we do in contrast. For instance, social media ‘friends.’

Maria Konnikova first assumes that no one joins Facebook to be sad and lonely. However, she found a study by Ethan Cross (2013), a psychologist from the University of Michigan and his colleagues which argue that people who used Facebook will become unhappy. They wanted to find out how the use of Facebook can affect them. The support is objective because the author presents facts and clear evidence, for example research done by Robert Kraut (1998) found that more people used the Web, the lonelier and more depressed they felt. In addition, after people went online for the first time, their sense of happiness and social connectedness dropped.

Throughout the speech, Jonathan Franzen highlights the fact that is unhealthy to live in a world of lies. ” This is why a world of liking is ultimately a lie”. Jonathan Franzen cannot stand the fact that people are too afraid to show their own personality, their own look, even their own identity. Additionally, Jonathan Franzen emphasizes that the world of social medias is a world of narcissism, and it is not a stable world. People might hide behind their screens with the illusion of a perfect life, but at some point in life, one has to walk out the cave and experience the real world.

Social media has created the popularity of many meaningless relationships diminishing the number of true connections among people. The author used the point-by-point organizational style for her essay. This can be seen the clearest in paragraphs

“A recent Pew Research survey of adults in the U.S. found that 71% use Facebook at least occasionally, and 45% of Facebook users check the site several times a day.” (WSJ, 2015). This essay will discuss how technology can make people more sociable and less sociable. How technology makes is more sociable: Firstly I will discuss how technology can make us more sociable.

Brooks’ position is seemingly critical of the modern day moral virtues; however, he does admit that there has been improvement in the treatment of women, or more accurately, the idea that “girls were expected to be quiet” (p 248), is one which is diminishing as “self-actualization and self-esteem” have functioned as a means for women to “articulate and cultivate self-assertion, strength, and identity” (ibid). In opposition to this, Brooks identifies three effects “on the moral ecology that have inflated the Big Me Adam I side of our natures and diminished the humbler Adam II” (p 25). These three effects are communication, in that it has become “faster and busier,” social media for it has become concentrated on “more self-referential information,” and lastly, social media’s encouragement of a “broadcasting personality” (ibid). Brooks continues to speak about social media by repeatedly labelling this age as a “more individualistic society,” one which has a steady decline in “intimacy, social trust, and empathy.” In the end, Brooks states that “it is okay to be flawed” (p 268), which can be confirmed by the previous chapters and the exceptional individuals who certainly had

In her essay, “I Had a Nice Time with you Tonight, on the app,” Jenna Wortham believes that social media apps are a helpful way to connect. Wortham swears by apps and is grateful that she can communicate with her boyfriend who is three thousand miles away. Yet some may challenge the view that Social Media apps are a reliable and effective method of communicating, Sherry Turkle stresses people are substituting online communication for face-to-face interaction. Although Turkle may only seem of concern to only a small group of people, it should in fact concern anyone who cares about the negative effects social media can have on people. In her eyes, nothing can replace person-to-person communication.

In the chapter, Growing up Tethered, from Alone Together, Sherry Turkle, focuses on how adolescents of this technological era are tethered and consistently feel the need to want to connect via cellphones and other electronics no matter the risks (430). She continues to discuss how we portray ourselves differently online because online we have time to create, edit, and delete biographical information (437). Turkle mentions the stress and pressure that is associated with creating and shaping one 's online image or identity and that most, if not all online profiles contain some sort of truth bending; Turkel hints that life without these online characters is beneficial or better

So many people having sharing personal views through social media. Definitely, our decision to tell and when to reveal our thoughts can be delicate, and there are also things which we wish to keep private but then again, social media are now helping you to create better personal trying to understand. They said, you are now indirectly allowing people to intruder and have a look into your private live, wanting them to invade your privacy. It is related to having them looking at you through your front window. This seemed to be accepted by everyone nowadays as it is now a part of our life, just as what McLuhan had said about global village, how by the means of these mediums, especially World Wide Web, that it is now easy to accept and pass message thereby making the world become like a small single village where people can easily contact one another; "the whole world considered as being closely connected by modern telecommunications and as being interdependent economically, socially and politically" -

This results into " a dramatic increase in sociability, but a different kind of sociability, facilitated and dynamized by permanent connectivity and social networking on the web."(Castells, 2010) Therefore, the social network sites became the preferred platforms of all kinds of activities, both business and personal. Hence, this gave way to a virtual life, where people can be present every minute. In consequence, it makes them feel connected to each other, as part of a community. Obviously, this is not replacement of the physical world, instead it is a facilitation of real daily living; that influence our behavior immensely.