ipl-logo

The Framers Of The Constitution: The Federalist System

232 Words1 Page

The framers of the Constitution agreed that the central government needed greater power.. The constitution is based on important principles that help to ensure government by popular sovereignty. The Constitution set those limits so that citizen know what their government is allowed to do and what it is not allowed to do The Articles of Confederation were not working. They were faced with the needing of a strong central government. At the same time, they wanted to keep independent state governments and to preserve self-government. The federalist system created by the United States Constitution divides powers between two different levels, the national, or the federal, government and the state government. The federal government makes laws that

Show More
Related

  • The Framers Of The United States Constitutional System

    516 Words  | 3 Pages

    The framers of the United States Constitution intentionally built points of conflict and tension into the constitutional system for several reasons. First, the framers established a system of checks and balances among the three branches of government—the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This division of powers creates a dynamic where each branch has the ability to limit or counteract the actions of the other branches. This intentional separation of powers leads to inevitable conflicts and tensions as each branch seeks to assert its authority and protect its interests. Next the framers created a federal system of government, where power is divided between the national government and state governments, also known as federalism.

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

    1511 Words  | 7 Pages

    Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq

    375 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States Constitution was created to define the powers and limitations of the government. It replaced the Articles of the Confederation, and was ratified by all 13 states in 1787 (American Government, n.d.). The ratification of the Constitution was not without opposition, and the government was split into two groups: federalists, and anti-federalists. The federalist group believed that a national governing body, ruled by the elite class was necessary. Antifederalists, on the other hand, believed that state governments should have more say, and that the government should be run by ordinary people (American Government, n.d.).

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    921 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the thirteen colonies declared their independence from Britain, they no longer had a government or authority to rule. So, the Articles of Confederation was created and became the first constitution to govern the United States. This plan was created in order to organize the nation and fight the Revolutionary War for independence. The Articles of Confederation had many weaknesses such as the government only had one branch that only created laws and did not have branches to execute, interpret, or enforce the laws. As a result, the Confederation failed the nation and it was abolished then a new constitution was created entitled the U.S Constitution.

    Read More

  • The Federalist Papers: Ratification Of The US Constitution

    152 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Federalist Papers The Federalist papers consists of 85 essays written in the late 1780s by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay. The three authors published it in New York newspapers under the name “Publius” to persuade its citizens to ratify the new U.S constitution. These essays argued in support for the ratification of the new U.S constitution by __________________________________. There are 3 well known federalist papers which are no. 10, no. 45 and no. 51.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Vs Constitution Dbq

    516 Words  | 3 Pages

    The structure and powers of the federal government changed under the Constitution as compared to the Articles of Confederation. Many people, known as the anti-Federalists, opposed these changes while on the contrary, many people, known as the Federalists, supported them. The framework and function of the federal government changed drastically under the Constitution. The federal government was much stronger under the Constitution because it was given the power to run the states under more unified control.

    Read More

  • How Did The Articles Of Confederation Influence The Constitution

    1018 Words  | 5 Pages

    After the Articles of Confederation failed because they failed to give enough power to the national government and congress, our founding father’s needed to reflect on its flaws for a new system to be set in place. Their new creation, our Constitution, was then set into place, and was created from a basis of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation directly influence the Constitution by its failure by changing some of the responsibilities of the federal and state governments. The Articles of Confederation gave too much power to the states, and the Constitution changed that.

    Read More

  • Framers Of Constitution

    467 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation were created as the first official government of the United States. It was based largely on the concept of the state government having greater power than the national congress. What started out being a good thing ended up having a lot of weaknesses. One general weakness is no executive branch to enforce the acts of congress.

    Read More

  • Revolutionary War: The Weakness Of Democracy

    587 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation maintained the principle that the national government would not hold more power than the states, which they saw as sovereign. This did satisfy the fears and questions

    Read More

  • Effects Of The Articles Of Confederation

    242 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation were put into effect to form some semblance of a central government, to keep peace between the states and to keep individual states from conducting foreign diplomacy on their own. Unfortunately the articles were flawed and gave the existing government little to no power. Federalism was the number one weakness of the Articles of Confederation. Without a separation of powers this type of government was bound to fail. Levying taxes was a much needed change to the Articles of Confederation.

    Read More

  • Problems Under The Articles Of Confederation

    615 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation had many problems and therefore it made the government weak. One of may problems was that under the Articles Of Confederation was that there was no executive branch, and so nobody could enforce or carry out laws made by Congress. Another problem was that each state only had one vote in Congress. When each state only had one vote states that had small populations had the same amount as a large state.

    Read More

  • Slavery In The US Constitution

    918 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation had a very weak central government so the rights of the people would be secure. The Articles of Confederation was ratified by

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Problems

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    In one hand, the Articles of Confederation had a weak central government, differing form the strong central government in the Constitution. The Constitution’s government had a structure of three different branches; the legislative, executive, and judicial branch; unlike the Articles of Confederation that had no structure whatsoever. The Articles of Confederation had many problems like, the poor international trade, poor foreign relations and a weak economy in contrast to the Constitution that only had one problem, the struggle over the ratification. the Articles of Confederation achieved the Northwest Ordinance and the Northwest Territory and according to a history website, the Constitution achieved that we had a system of checks and balances, that we had a bill of rights, and, eventually, the survival of a bloody civil war intact. Lastly, the Constitution had three compromises: the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise and the Slave Trade compromise.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    148 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation was structured to give the majority power to the States while limiting the involvement of Government. The federal government was bestowed with the responsibility of mutual defense for the states and to “secure the blessings of liberty.” Government was supposed to be able to pass acts, however, each state was only permitted one representative regardless of that state’s population and votes needed to be unanimous for an act to pass. The power of the central government was vague and nearly unenforceable. Without a judicial system the federal government was unable to enforce penalties or consequences and without the ability to collect tax they could not finance the government meetings let alone the military to defend

    Read More

More about The Framers Of The Constitution: The Federalist System

Open Document