ipl-logo

Analysis Of The Greatest Happiness Principle By John Stuart Mill

962 Words4 Pages

In Utilitarianism Mill delineates his teleological principle of utility. This essay wishes to examine Mill’s moral theory of Utilitarianism through the Greatest Happiness Principle and his two arguments that pleasure should qualitative instead of quantitative and endowed towards mental instead of physical pleasure. Additionally the shortcoming of his theory will be noted: The erosion of human rights and our rational choice to choose suitable pleasure being undermined.
The Greatest Happiness Principle (utility) founds Mill’s moral theory as it divides right from wrong behaviour, detonating that correct behaviour promotes happiness and incorrect creates unhappiness (Mill, 1863, p. 10). Happiness means pleasure without the presence of pain and unhappiness is the promotion of pain and deprivation of pleasure. Thus morality is based upon us striving for pleasure and averting pain or induce satisfaction and halt discomfort to achieve …show more content…

According to Mill (1863, p. 14) utility also maintains that the most amount of happiness should be centred on society writ large instead of the individual. Since, individuals can only attain happiness by the majority’s happiness being fulfilled. For example some individuals opposed Brexit because of adverse economic impacts it could have on them, however during the referendum a larger majority of voters were pleased by it and voted it into law thus the majority was satisfied at the expense to the individuals.
As Utilitarianism centres our behaviour catalysing by pain or pleasure. Understanding why Mill argues that quality (the ranking certain raptures as more meritorious than others) of pleasure is more vital than quantity (the amount of a certain pleasure) of pleasure helps for the conceptualisation of his thesis. There are three manners that quality outweighs quantity: Preferences, our high faculty

Show More
Related

  • Who Is John Stuart Mill In Defense Of Utilitarianism

    240 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Defense of Utilitarianism, J.S. Mill In the excerpt from John Stuart Mill’s book, Utilitarianism, Mill defends the utilitarian theory against three different objections. The first, and strongest opposition to utilitarianism was the accusation that the emphasis on the pursuit of pleasure makes utilitarianism “a doctrine worthy of swine.” This was my favorite argument because Mill defended it so well stating that there are varying degrees of pleasure. He refers to them as “high” and “low” pleasures, which I do agree with.

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill Principle Analysis

    1245 Words  | 5 Pages

    The object of this essay is to show a simple evaluation of john Stuart mill principle “an action is right that it does not cause harm to another person” I will be exercising both evaluations and explaining why the positive side outweighs the negative side of the principle, in a society that it’s people are emancipated to control their own opinions. Mill Stuart in his autobiography of 1873 he narrates liberty as a philosophic chronicle of indivisible accuracy. (Mill (1989.edn).p.189) rather than speaking of rights, many claim a ‘right’ not to be harmed ,mill says that only a harm or risk to harm is enough vindication for using power above someone else. John Stuart moreover he adequate his principle by reckoning that it is not good to use power

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism And The Prime Directive: Star Trek

    306 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mills explains Utilitarianism as achieving life’s goals, it is what everyone wants or seek for. He further explains that utilitarianism promotes the quality of life. Furthermore, utilitarianism is connected to happiness, because we all seek to achieve different goals in life, and those goals are what makes up happy. We all want certain things in life, or want to achieve certain things. Utilitarianism promotes happiness, happiness exclude pain, suffering, struggles, stress, and anything that makes one ‘unhappy’ or ‘sad’.

    Read More

  • The One's Who Walked Away From Omelas Analysis

    482 Words  | 2 Pages

    1. What does Mill mean by the quality of pleasure? Presumably the quality of pleasure in listening to Mozart is higher than the quality of pleasure in listening to a television commercial jingle. How would Mill show that this is so? Mill defines the quality of pleasure as high and low.

    Read More

  • Mark Kingwell In Pursuit Of Happiness Analysis

    573 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Mark Kingwell’s excerpt, “In Pursuit of Happiness,” he discusses the challenge of defining happiness. This work serves to inform the audience on a topic they may never have considered while using evidence and support from philosophers, authors, and even scientists to contribute to various viewpoints on the subject. At the end of the excerpt, Kingwell discusses happiness, even unhappiness, and concludes with his own opinions on the subject. Since the beginning of human existence, people have tried to define happiness, but no one has described it sufficiently, which means the search continues.

    Read More

  • Comparing Mill And Kant's Theories

    714 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mill and Kant have opposite idea and they support different moral philosophies. Mill exactly suppose the idea of social thinking, namely he claims that everyone attach an importance to other human beings. However, Kant considers that selfishness reflect people’s characteristics, in other words, each person should pay attention to themselves not others, because the most important thing for them is themselves. Kant also highlight that people can only behave in a good manner, if they have good will. In other words, Kant attach an importance to people’s instinct or characteristics, Mill gives weight to promoting happiness and dissolution of the pain.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Utilitarianism

    1542 Words  | 7 Pages

    This essay will reject the utilitarian claim as to always act as to maximize utility. In order to exhibit why this claim fails, this argument will be based on the most refined description of utility, namely, preference satisfaction utilitarianism, an action which is right, because it produces the most of what is intrinsically valuable, which is more than just the ultimate consequence of pleasure as suggested by the hedonistic utilitarian but instead, is the maximization of individual human preferences being satisfied in relation to the world and therefore, this action creates the maximum balance of happiness over unhappiness for all human beings concerned. This essay will present three objections against and three separate responses in defence

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Kant And Mill

    551 Words  | 3 Pages

    Two of the most well respected philosophers of their time Kant and Mill share their views as different as they might be. Kant’s basis is categorical imperative. In the writings of Grounding for the Metaphysics of morals it is described as “act only according to the maxim whereby you can… will that it should become a universal law” (Kant, 30). The other main point that Kant makes in his agreement is that we should not treat people as means but as ends themselves (36). Mill has a different stance, he states his principle in Utilitarianism “Greatest Happiness Principle”.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Character And Ecstasy: Against The Legalization Of Drugs

    550 Words  | 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism is the moral theory that says we should do what creates the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of individuals. Philosopher John Stuart Mill described the Principle of Utility as follows: “actions are right in proportion as they tend to maximize happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure” (p. 144). Utilitarian analysis shows that prohibition of hard drugs maximizes happiness or “utility”.

    Read More

  • Philippa Foot Arguments Against Utilitarianism

    1325 Words  | 6 Pages

    Caleb Stephens April 15, 2017 Introduction to Philosophy The goal of this paper is to demonstrate that Philippa Foot’s objection, raised to her own argument against utilitarianism, is correct. Her initial thesis is that benevolence, while the foundation of utilitarianism, is an internal end of morality, rather than the ultimate end of morality. The possible objection to this that there must be some overarching reason behind morality, which must imply a form of consequentialism. The response she offers is that there should be some other form of morality, which is a weak argument, as it does not provide an alternate conception of morality itself.

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill On Happiness Essay

    852 Words  | 4 Pages

    Easy enough, but then pleasure is then divided into two levels: higher and lower. Lower levels of pleasure are those that we as humans share with animals. They include things such as food, sex, and music. All of these are relatively easy to attain. Higher levels of pleasures are intellectual, such as art or chess.

    Read More

  • What Is Mill's View Of Utilitarianism

    290 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the reading, "Utilitarianism," the author argues that happiness is the main criteria for morality since people base their actions off of the overall happiness it could promote (pp. 195 and 198) and that while actions differ in the quantity and quality of pleasure, pleasurable actions that require intellect are of the higher pleasures (pp. 196-197).   One of the author’s main reasons to support his view is that morality is determined by what increases or decreases the overall amount of utility (pp. 197). Mill denounces the view of utilitarianism as a selfish, unsympathetic ideology by stating that it could only be best used if everyone could promote utility, and he uses the Greatest Happiness Principle, in which he explains that actions

    Read More

  • Essay On Divine Command Theory

    1218 Words  | 5 Pages

    The main principle of utilitarianism is happiness. People who follow this theory strive to fulfill the “ultimate good”. The “ultimate good” is defined as ultimate pleasure with out any pain. It is said that the pleasure can be of any quantity and any quality, but pleasures that are weighted more important are put at a higher level than others that are below it. This ethical theory also states that if society would fully embrace utilitarianism then people would naturally realize their moral standing in the

    Read More

  • Critical Analysis Of John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'

    1564 Words  | 7 Pages

    John Stuart Mill, at the very beginning of chapter 2 entitled “what is utilitarianism”. starts off by explaining to the readers what utility is, Utility is defined as pleasure itself, and the absence of pain. This leads us to another name for utility which is the greatest happiness principle. Mill claims that “actions are right in proportions as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” “By Happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain, by happiness, pain and the privation of pleasure”.

    Read More

  • Categorical Moral Reasoning

    1005 Words  | 5 Pages

    What Mill means by utilitarianism is giving the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people. According to Sandel's lecture Mill's utilitarianism uses consequentialist reasoning. Categorical means absolute for example, if someone asks you if you are hungry a you say,"no",

    Read More

More about Analysis Of The Greatest Happiness Principle By John Stuart Mill

Open Document