In some of the genocides of the recent past, such as the Armenian massacres, the Holocaust, and the Rwandan genocide, a pattern of causes are shown prior to the act of ethnic annihilation. For example, the hardships and difficulties that infect the nation produces an overwhelming feeling of defeat. But many that experienced it had believed it to be just when accusing a minority to be unreasonably responsible for it. They target that specific population as it is easily done for their past had been tormented with the same discrimination. As this is seen consistently throughout the unfortunate multitude of genocides, it can be used as a means of preventing the murder of innocent lives. Additionally, when researching such a heavy topic, it was
It’s not a question that many historians try and explain the motives behind perpetrator actions in violent events. History has recurred throughout time, especially in the 20th c. when it comes to genocide, where massive groups are involved in mobilizing the same type of destruction. Why then, is it so easy for many ordinary people to commit such horrible violence? This is the question that both James Waller and Daniel Goldhagen try to answer in their books about the perpetrators in the Holocaust. Waller provides a general model, which can be applied to genocide and mass killing events, that explains the sequence of events which lead an ordinary person to perpetrate evil.
“What connects two thousand years of genocide? Too much power in too few hands.” (Simon Wiesenthal) Genocides have been going on for years and years to come, the murder, the starvation, the manipulation, and, the constant fear. During the time of the Holocaust, genocides were striking and seemed to never come to an end.
The act of genocide carried out by a group’s oppressors characterizes itself in the intimate knowledge the oppressor has of the group’s social, cultural, and political institutions. Raphael Lemkin describes genocide as an act of anti-sociology where the perpetrator destroys a group’s societal institutions to destroy them in whole or in part. This destruction is described by Lemkin as an anti-sociology because of its targeting of all aspects of a group’s societal institutions: political, social, cultural, economic, biological, physical, religious, and moral. (Lemkin, Chapter IX: Section 2). Genocide destroys a group’s social, individual, political, and cultural connections as demonstrated by the Armenian and Native American genocides where
"Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?" - Adolf Hitler Obersalzberg Speech, August 22, 1939 The Armenian Genocide and Holocaust were similar in that their main goal was to eliminate an entire religion, however there are far more differences in the cause, course, and effects. The Armenian Genocide was carried out by the Young Turks, a Turkish Nationalist reform party in the 20th century, who favored reformation of the absolute monarchy of the Ottoman Empire.[1] To do so, they believed that one particular group/religion was weighing them down: non-Muslim Armenians. With these (mostly Christian) Armenian civilians gone, the Ottoman Empire would gain the power it once had and have a say in the war. In many opinions,
Genocides, the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular group or nation, has affected various countries. Genocide not only brings a war but also problems like decreasing economic affairs and social problems. When genocide starts, society overlooks economic affairs like their agriculture since they focus on the war. In the case of Rwanda, once the genocide had begun many farmers fled or were killed. "All was
Some preconceived ideas I have of Genocide/ Holocaust is that first of all millions of Jews were persecuted and murdered of out pure hatred and racial discrimination. Along with them died other minority groups such as Gypsies, homosexuals, and the handicapped all simply because there were inferior and not pure-blood German or healthy. Hitler's reign and acts of terror were extremely horrific as well as a tragic time in history. When I think of the terms Holocaust and Genocide, I think of the concentration camps and all the people who died in there of starvation, disease, overwork, or cold-blooded murder by a Nazi.
The Holocaust was nothing short of mass genocide an entire culture just because they didn’t fit in with a government “vision”, which made them easy scapegoats for the Nazi Regime for problems that came to Germany after the First World War. So when the Holocaust started, many refuges evacuated Germany and parts of Europe for places such as Palestinian, which was once apart of their homeland. But when the new people there, the Arabians, would limit or even try and stop them from getting in, it created a heavy tension that has lasted to this day.
The extermination of the Chinese was so fast and gruesome that it’s torture methods are worst then the Jewish Holocaust. The Japanese had many different ways of exterminating the Chinese. They raped them, burned them alive, tortured by needles, torn apart by dogs, decapitated, and stabbed to death with a bayonet (Unknown). At this point in the war/genocide, only rapid and overwhelming armed intervention can stop the genocide, which also at this point, nobody has because there was no time to prepare (Brook). The Chinese stated that between 380,000 - 420,000 people were killed.
The Holocaust and Darfur genocides are both huge turning points in history and we learn a lot from them. Both the genocides left millions of people dead for no reason. The cause of the Holocaust was the rise of the Nazis hatred and anti-Semitism. One cause of the Darfur genocide was the Black Arabs being discriminated against. Also Hitler and the Nazis convinced the people the Jews were responsible for the bad economic state.
Have you ever been picked last in school or treated unfairly? I can tell you that the Tutsis people of Rwanda were. They were killed because they were thought to be different. In 1916 Belgium took over Rwanda from Germany, and they introduced ID cards naming the people by ethnicity. The Belgians thought the Tutsi were a better race, so they gave them better jobs and educational opportunities.
The Rwandan genocide vs. the Holocaust “Genocide is an attempt to exterminate a people, not to alter their behavior.” Jack Schwartz. Genocide is mass murder, it happens in all parts of the world. A common known genocide is the Holocaust. Where a group known as the“Nazis” (lead by Hitler) murdered more than six million people (many were Jewish).
Throughout the semester this class has presented information that wasn’t known to me, for example that there is a specific definition for the term genocide, there are deeper reasons into committing genocide, and that there are other genocides besides the Holocaust. With my new found knowledge I plan on discussing and answering two question that have been presented after completing this course, first, while studying the Holocaust, the Armenian Genocide, and the Rwandan Genocide, one has to notice that all three incidents take place during times of war whether from outside aggressors or internally between one another, so one must question why are genocides (these in particular) more likely to occur during wartime? The next question that must be answered deals with the first-person accounts of these acts and how the accounts reflect the events that took place? Do the recollections help explain what truly took place, are they truly accurate or do they contradict anything we’ve learned and introduce more questions than they answer. To ultimately answer the first question of why genocides tend to take place during times of war, one has to think that there is some type of advantage of committing genocide during times of war and for this question I have decided to compare two cases to help answer this question, The Holocaust and The Armenian Genocide.
The Death of The Congolese and Jews: The Holocaust Vs Congo Genocide The Congo Genocide was on par or more gruesome than The Holocaust that everyone talks about. The Holocaust used gas chambers, starvation, and overwork, but the Congo Genocide used beheadings, working conditions, and dismembering .
The Holocaust and Rwanda were both genocides. They have many similarities but their differences outweigh the things they have in common. Adolf Hitler was the main aggressor with the Holocaust, he was born on April 20th, 1889 in Austria. He committed suicide on April 30th, 1945 in Germany. Augustin Bizimungu was the one who started the genocide in Rwanda.
Globalization is a massive thing that affects every person on the planet in one way or another. This source raises the argument that globalization is a disease that harms people in more ways then it helps and needs to be stopped before it wipes out the human race. This raises a good point is some ways because globalization does harm humans in many way such as losing jobs due to outsourcing and the people who get the outsourced jobs are put into horrible working conditions and underpaid without benefits. But it also helps in some ways with trade and communication strengthening the relations of countries. I do agree with the source that globalization harms many people but not quite to the extent that the author goes to, I think that