The amount of power exerted can vary, depending on the geographic situation of the country over which the power is being exercised or exerted, and the strategic importance of the country to the interest of the wielder of the external force. It can also depend on the level of development of the country, and its resources, especially natural and mineral. Other factors to consider include its importance in the concerned region, and this latter is closely linked to the economic and other resources it possesses. Yet another factor is the strength of the force that is being exerted or exercised. In the context of developing countries, the amount of “force” exerted or exercised could be a function of the resistance put up by the developing countries, …show more content…
Agencies and organizations, especially non-governmental organizations (NGOs) wield such powers. Ahmed and Potter, (2006, pp. 14, 15) stated that NGOs especially transnational/international non-governmental organizations (TNGOs/INGOs), have an impact on both international and domestic politics. From Ahmed and Potter’s discussion of the various international relations theories and their relevance to NGOs, one could infer that these NGOs have power and can influence behavior. In fact, some of these NGOs, especially T NGOs and INGOs have operating budgets that are much bigger than those of some of the developing countries in which they operate. Just taking the United States economy alone in 2012, 5.4 percent of the GDP of the United States of America was from the tax-exempt entities, that is NGOs and charities. This sector contributed $US887.3 billion to the US economy (NonProfit Times 2014). The annual budget for World Vision International in 2011 at $US2.8 billion, was greater than the budget of all UN agencies combined, with the exception of the World Food Programme (see Morton, pp. 325–352) Morton (pp. 325–352) stated that eight INGOs have a combined revenue of $US11.7 billion in 2011, which represented an increase of 40per cent over the figure for 2005. In fact, Morton (pp. 325–352) indicated that in 2011, the World Vision International Global revenue was greater than the budgets of 12 out of 23 of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Development Assistance Committee (DAC) donors and was more than the gross national income of smaller African and European
Moreover, researching and finding common data is very difficult as there are so many different agencies and fund design principles available such as private or public ones, types of financial instruments or various implementing entities (Sierra, 2011). However, the UNFCCC is said to be “the primary international, intergovernmental forum for negotiating global response” and it should therefore be its role to bring data together in order to make measurement analysis easier with more concentrated
WikiLeaks recovered an email sent by Doug Band, a former top aide to Bill Clinton, in which Band spoke of a “circle of enrichment in which he raised money for the Clinton Foundation from top-tier corporations such as Dow Chemical and Coca-Cola that were clients of his firm, Teneo, while pressing many of those same donors to provide personal income to the former president. ” There’s no question that the organization has received a lot of funding from various companies (Between $1 million and $5 million each from Microsoft, Pfizer, and Exxonmobil). From 2009 to 2012, the foundation raised over $500 million, but only a small portion of that money went to direct relief ($75 million). $75 million is a lot of money but considering that the Clinton Foundation is a charity, that’s next to nothing compared to what they receive through donations and fundraising. The tax returns from these years have shown that $290 million went to “other expenses” that remained unnamed.
The answer is disturbing. The money is going to where the donor organizations want, rather than where it would have the most benefit. “International aid is too often project-based. It tends to focus on
“An in-depth analysis on effects of Imperialism on Rwanda” Nowadays, European countries such as England, France, Germany, Belgium, and many other countries possess a colossal clout throughout the world. It is an impeccable fact that such countries, indeed, have served as a rudiment pivot and step for the world to be advanced to the point where we are since the Industrial Revolution. Such countries, because of it, without a doubt, have a crucial status globally and become the superpower and commercial hub on our planet. On the back side of their gleaming growth, however, there is an invisible part left behind their luminous development: the Imperialism. The term “Imperialism” refers to a policy of extending a country’s authority and political clout by using its military forces and diplomacy.
In 2013, the Gross-Domestic-Product for the US was 16.8 trillion USD. Out of the 16.8 trillion, 1.5% (2.52 trillion USD) was used towards foreign aid (“Foreign Assistance and
One cannot discuss international conflicts, wars, and struggles throughout pre-20th-century history without giving enormous precedence to the might of military and naval elites that were fundamentally the core catalyst in determining the outcomes of some of the most ferocious violence history has witnessed. Violence has always been engrained in the human psyche, and those who have forged the strongest alliances, the mightiest of military forces, and developed the shrewdest of tactics prevail, victors, most of the time. With regards to political relations, a countries military might will always coincide with factors such as economy, differing governing systems, land mass etc. as the foremost justifications as to why a superpower is a superpower,
The association of poverty with Africa goes together like apple pie and America. From the advertisements of malnourished, African children to our education, or rather lack of education, about African countries in the American school system, the concept of Africa as an impoverished continent has been engrained into our minds. This rhetoric of Africa has lasted over decades, with a substantial amount of aid being given to African countries to rectify this problem. And yet, sixteen of the world’s poorest countries were identified as being in sub-Saharan Africa as of 2013. This insinuates that foreign countries and organizations that provide aid, need to reevaluate why aid isn’t making a bigger impact at fixing the problem.
Kofi Annan, once the seventh Secretary-General of the United Nations, stated, “If globalization is to succeed, it must succeed for poor and rich alike. It must deliver rights no less than riches. It must provide social justice and equity no less than economic prosperity and enhanced communication” (Kofi Annan). Persistently, the world is reminded of the advantages of globalization and how history could have been shaped without its existence. In spite of the declarations that defend the international movement enhancing the ideology of an interconnected planet, the downsides of globalization cannot be ignored.
Globalization is a massive thing that affects every person on the planet in one way or another. This source raises the argument that globalization is a disease that harms people in more ways then it helps and needs to be stopped before it wipes out the human race. This raises a good point is some ways because globalization does harm humans in many way such as losing jobs due to outsourcing and the people who get the outsourced jobs are put into horrible working conditions and underpaid without benefits. But it also helps in some ways with trade and communication strengthening the relations of countries. I do agree with the source that globalization harms many people but not quite to the extent that the author goes to, I think that
The foreign aid program is created to bring an end to poverty, conflicts and other difficulties that poor-developed countries are enabled to solve it. Everything is not about money, but it is about power, political view or group society. In many well-developed countries, corruption and political control are being reviewed by the UN and other governance, because they could be penalized or have sanctions. In a less-developed country that are already being helped with foreign aid, the governance and other aid programs must have their hands tied when it comes to penalized or sanctioned, because they are already in need, therefore corruption is created in those less-developed countries and hunger follows. There is the end of hungriness that is currently trying to be solved in the world, but there are still conflicts with political control that keeps the foreign aid to cause hunger in
They rely on pennies as their main source of income. On some sort of level, anyone who wants to keep pennies or not, can agree on this statement. But, if we get rid of this irrelevant penny, our lowest value coin will be the nickel. So if a foundation such as make a wish makes 77.7 million dollars a year. Assuming that all of those donations are pennies, (Which they are not) they would make almost 400 million dollars.
In International Relations, various theoretical perspectives are employed to provide a clear framework for the analysis of complex international relationships. One key concept that scholars have strived to fully analyze is “anarchy” and its significance within the International System. Anarchy, as defined by many IR scholars, is the lack of an overarching authority that helps govern the international system. (Class Notes, January 29). Its importance and power to dictate actions between states is often debated and various theories have been used to describe its significance.
There are many issues regarding the welfare of children from all over the world. Children have been repeatedly impacted by wars and conflicts in their countries. Moreover, many children from some areas do not have access to their rights such as education and health and have to suffer from discrimination, violence, abuse and sexual and economic exploitation. After the World War II, Children from all over Europe had to suffer the aftermath of the war. This is when the United Nations stepped in and created United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund, or as today’s shorter term, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) in December 1946 with the sole purpose to lessen the suffering by providing foods, clothing and health care.
Nowadays, in the light of the development in technology, especially in transportation and media, trade and communication has increased rapidly among countries. This trend is called globalization. Generally speaking, globalization has its own advantages and disadvantages. The development in international trade and communication has created employment and opportunities for millions of people, but it has also made poor countries poorer. In my opinion, globalization has both positive and negative aspects.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BE A MECHANISM FOR EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. FORTUNATA MULEKUZI REGISTRATION NUMBER: PG201401993 A CONCEPT NOTE SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNIVERSIDADE FERNANDO PESSOA AND OPEN UNIVERSITY OF TANZANIA 2016 Background to the Problem The phenomenon international relations emerged at the beginning of the 20th century largely in the West and in particular in the United States as that country grew in power and influence. Bloomfield et al.