As Anais Nin said, "We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are". As human beings, we actively process the information around us. Each one of us is unique and we interpret things in different ways according to our background, beliefs, reason, emotion and perception. Have you ever come across a situation as simple as a traffic accident. Each driver would blame the other and people around the accident would have different opinions about who is to blame. How is that different people on viewing the same accident, have different viewpoints? This is due to our different interpretations and as a result of this, disagreements may occur. Disagreements are conflicting views and opinions and are crucial in the pursuit of knowledge. They …show more content…
When an artwork is created, the artist uses a set of emotions to create it. Similarly, while an expert views an artwork, he/she will interpret it using a different set of emotions. Thus one's interpretation of an artwork could differ from the intent and the classification of an artwork. Art is subjective and open to interpretation. In the "Wheatfield with crows" that was painted by Vincent Van Gogh, many experts believe that the crows in the painting are thought to represent loneliness and isolation. However, the latter believed that the crows are a symbol of death. However, Vincent Van Gogh painted the crows as a representation of freedom. In this example, on viewing the same painting, two different groups of experts came to different conclusions and this differed from the intent of the artwork. Thus disagreements in art could occur as a result of interpreting the painting using different set of emotions. The emotions that an expert uses are thus consequently depended on his/her past experiences and subjective beliefs. However, we need to question where the disagreements exists, does it exists in the emotion used to interpret the painting or the emotion provoked by the …show more content…
In the natural sciences, disagreements occur as a result of reason. Reason is used by experts to doubt the validity of findings and delve deeper in the subject. In the arts, both our emotions and our past experiences influence our understanding of what is truth in art. Our understanding of what is the truth allow for different perspectives and interpretation of given facts. In a artwork the emotion provoked by the artwork and the emotion used to interpret the artwork coupled with our culture, beliefs and experiences contribute to conflicting opinions. Truth in art is subjective and differs from person to person this is what brings disagreements between experts. Through disagreements experts confirm finding and explore knowledge further. This helps to validate the conclusions drawn and theories formulated. In the arts, disagreements increase value of a painting. In the case of the Mona Lisa, Her smile is complicated and many experts disagree on the nature of the smile. Now the Mona Lisa is worth 100 million dollars. Thus disagreements are caused due to different subjective interpretations and this helps to acquire more reliable facts and
Art has been around for centuries, expressed in various ways through different mediums; painting, drawing, photography, music, and so many more. Each having smaller categories within them. One can create a portrait with different types of paint, chalk, pens and pencils, the lens of a camera. A musician can convey a feeling within lyrics, or notes of a song. Separate forms of art, yet if you look closely enough, you can see similarities as well.
Conflicts are challenges faced by people, which in turn helps them to succeed in their lives. In the novel The First Stone by Don Aker, Chad Kennedy faces different types of conflict that lead to positive personal growth. Chad was unable to cope with the death of his grandmother. His depression and anxiety led him to be unkind towards others.
One way paintings demonstrate this is the difference between the Mona Lisa and Madonna Enthroned Between Two Angels. The older painting, Madonna Enthroned Between Two Angles, is unrealistic and has rather depressing dark colors. While the Renaissance painting, the Mona Lisa, is not only much more realistic, but also a lot more cheerful, brighter feel, and became a true masterpiece (Doc A). In the paintings, the fact the Renaissance painting is brighter, more realistic and a famous masterpiece, shows that the Renaissance changed the art style into a unique, amazing representation that changed the entire future of art. The paintings from the Renaissance showed that people saw each other differently than before( Doc A).
Depending on the person, time, and venue every view of a situation is different. Some people tend to stick to one perspective, never daring to try and see things from another point of view. They can’t see past their nose, so to speak. Others change their perspective often. Sometimes a person's outlook relies on how that person is feeling in the moment.
Art is not nearly as well rounded nowadays as it was in the renaissance. For example the Mona Lisa by Leonardo da vinci was an exceptional painting that had tons of detail such as the the ripples in her sleeves and the curls in her hair( doc. a). This painting shows that this was a happy point in time because she is smiling in the portrait(doc. a).
Understanding different points of view is a critical element in creating a more diverse and knowledgeable society, which then enhances people’s critical thinking. Which would disappear over time without
As a result, disagreements arise since there will be different interpretations of the fact. Different cultural backgrounds and our ideologies affect our interpretation. Firstly, it is important to define what a fact is and then to specify it to a discipline: the natural sciences and
In life the mind is always playing tricks, tricks to make us believe what it wants. However is it really life that plays those tricks or is it the knowledge that we have acquired? Knowledge has and always will play a role in perception. Sometimes new knowledge will change the way that we view the same images, it’s never so clear-cut. The various amounts of information will also create differing opinions, making art never just have one right opinion.
People disagree with each other, it is a fact of life. No matter if it is about how water is or is not wet or whether you put the milk or the cereal in the bowl first, people will always disagree. Everyone has small arguments with each other, but they always have something similar in common. Everyone has different opinions depending on where they are coming from or what they believe in. In the movie High Noon and the story “The Most Dangerous Game”, there are characters who have different opinions that disagree because of what they are surrounded by.
Because Dean uses many different sources coming from people of many different professions, not just art historians, she successfully avoids any traces of biases throughout her essay. She shows how all different types of people, including archaeologists, anthropologists, and just an average person, often succumb to the use of these four different mistakes to incorrectly identify pieces as art. A bias is often formed when the argument is supported by only a small window of evidence, and in this essay, Dean successfully avoids that mistake, and there for creates an argument with no
In Document A, there are two paintings; one from the Middle Ages and one from the Renaissance. The first image by Duccio di Buoninsegna depicts Mary holding a baby Jesus in her arms. The second painting by Leonardo da Vinci displays a famous painting by the Mona Lisa, which is a woman standing in front of a fairly bland background. The Mona Lisa’s bland background makes you focus more on the person and her emotion rather than a very religious and holy background that has almost no emotion involved in it. Also, Document B presents two quotes that oppose each other in many ways.
In the excerpt The Decline of Radicalism Daniel J. Boorstin discusses the distinction between dissent and disagreement. Boorstin makes the broad claim that there is a significant difference separating the two: dissent is a poison to our society while disagreement is good. While it’s true disagreement is good it is false to claim that dissension is the “Problem of America today.” Both disagreement and dissent contribute to the functioning of a democracy as proven throughout history. The author, Boorstin, said “Disagreement is the lifeblood of democracy, dissension is it’s cancer.”
Art is like a language, ideas and thoughts that may not be able to be articulated any other way. The big debate is whether artist artwork is a waste of resources and time, or if it is good for the world with all the creativity and the beauty it has. Art is more than justifiable to enjoy it. The enjoyment of art gives modern
i. // DEFINITION OF CONFLICT // What exactly is conflict? We might often find ourselves being confused to stumble upon questions like these. Conflict has various meanings, according to Google, conflict comes in both noun and verb forms. As a noun, conflict means a serious disagreement, typically a one that lasts for quite a long period of time. However, as a verb, conflict means being incompatible, at variance and also, clash.
1.2 Statement of Significance Art can do lots of things that can create powerful and great changes in ourselves. Artist is someone that is so hard to read if we fail to understand them to interpret the underlying meaning behind their painting because it is their getaway to express their emotions and desires to the community. To accomplish this, the artists are communicating with the society by delivering their messages through their artworks.