In the article, “The Indispensable Opposition,” author, Walter Lippmann, argues his claim that we must view the freedom of oppositions as a way to improve our decisions in a democratic society rather than just tolerating that freedom of speech. When freedom of speech is tolerated and only seen as a right to speak, Lippmann believes that the liberty of opinion becomes a luxury.
Moving forward, Lippmann then states that we must understand that the freedom of speech for our opponents are a vital necessity since it provides our own opinions to grow in improvement. Through practical experience, we realize we need the freedom of opposition and is no longer just our opponent’s right. In fact, Lippmann claims this system of free speech allows us to
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
“ ‘I wholly disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it’ ” (Lippmann 14-15). Voltaire’s statement explains that even though he disagrees with an opinion, he will defend the entitlement of freedom of speech. In Walter Lippmann’s essay “The Indispensable Opposition,” his argument on freedom of speech is that American society should value and tolerate others opinions because it is necessary in a civilized society. Utilizing rhetorical strategies such as diction, parallelism, and the use of personal pronouns; he emphasizes his stance on liberty of opinion.
It would nurture the characteristics of a democratic environment that would let everyone voice their ideals without any penalties. The society he lived in rejected having any freedom of action and freedom of expression, but he took a stand and said “I am. I think. I will. ”(94).
Hasen, R. L. (2017). Speech and democracy: A citizens united framework. Cornell Law Review, 103(6), 1203-1261.
Lippman uses one main example to support his thesis, a quote from Voltaire, an expert satirist. Voltaire criticized many people in his writing during his lifetime and therefore, certainly believed in the freedom of speech. His very famous quote, “I wholly disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it,” is the best quote that Lippman could have
Dissent in America is an extremely pressing problem that we, as a country, should address. In the excerpt from Daniel J. Boorstin’s The Decline of Radicalism, Boorstin stresses this issue in our country today- stating that dissension is the cause of all problems in the United States of America. Defined simply, disagreement means the state of being at a variance or a quarrel. When two parties agree to disagree, this can be called a disagreement. Dissent, means to withhold opinions contrary to what is acceptable and right.
By the freedom of opinion, cannot be meant the right of thinking merely; for of this right the greatest Tyrant cannot deprive his meanest slave; but it is freedom in the communication of sentiments [by] speech or through the press” (Voices of Freedom, Chapter
The tongue is a needed part to the body which has many functions. The tongue is used to taste scrumptious foods which we crave, and more importantly, is used to form words. These words however, can be used for good, or for bad. Each and every word that is whispered, uttered, spoken or yelled from a mouth, will either be accepted, or hated. The words that are hated are taught to be put on a leash, but “Wild tongues can’t be tamed, they can only be cut out.
Walter Lippmann asserts how because people have the right to speak, they also have the right to freedom. Lippmann discusses and compares how even though you have the right to speak it does not mean that it is wanted and the way a person has rights and freedom may not always be wanted. Lippmann establishes his point of the right to freedom through repetition, strong diction, and historical examples of people and time periods. Lippmann employs repetition to emphasize his view on the rights of freedom.
The theory also discusses falsehoods and their place in the marketplace of ideas. The theory places falsehoods as a very important part of the marketplace, because falsehoods contribute to the integrity of the truths. The article then goes on to discuss the importance of Intellectual Freedom and Freedom of Speech in democracy. Oltmann states that Freedom of Speech is necessary to democracy because it allows the circulation of free thought and opinions that then lead to political involvement of Americans. The source then discusses the place that the library and IF
Democracy can simultaneously be seen as one of humanity’s finest creations, and also a natural result of the individual’s innate right to equality. As a political system that is shaped by the desires and opinions of the population, the actions and effects of its implementation become a tangible part of the lives of each and every member within the system’s jurisdiction. It is unique in that, when properly executed, the wishes of a collective population directly influence the direction of a governing body. Such responsibility, therefore, must not be taken for granted and it is thus the obligation of every citizen to partake in and engage with their democracy in at least some way. The democratic political system, and the significant change it
1.0 INTRODUCTION In the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), freedom of speech falls under the Article 19 which is the freedom of opinion and expression. It protects one’s freedom ‘to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers’ (The United Nations, 1948). Article 19(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) adds that the freedom of expression could be ‘either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice’. Besides being an individual’s fundamental liberty of expression, Santa Clara University School of Law Professor Russell W. Galloway (1991) states that free speech is the ‘matrix of all other freedoms’.