Opposition To Civil Rights Essay

Hughes used dialect of African Americans and themes that they related to. Many people at the time dislike Hughes writing style because he wrote about African Americans in an non-glamourous way. He wrote about their hardship and suffering as well as their successes. However, this embarrassed African Americans because they knew the possibility of white people reading it and they disliked the idea of white people knowing their weaknesses. Hughes, although he struggled, became the first African American to make his lively solely off his writing.

Many may question the idea that a law is unjust if it is inflicted on a mass population who had no part in enacting and devising the law. In the United States, citizens would consider that predicament as a violation of democracy. However, many minorities, particular black American were inflicted by laws that were passed without a fair consensus due to simulations that limited their rights as American citizens. As a result, many black Americans risk their lives fighting for justice for the black community. Although it is one’s moral obligation to abide by the laws for the sake of humanity and harmony amongst the nation, it is unconstitutional to not hold all accountable to the same standards of this nation’s constitution.

The NAACP impacted a lot of african american lives around the united states. They helped african americans be looked at differently in the world then what they used to be seen as in the old days. Without Civil Rights and fighting against anti-black activist america would be the same as it use to be , when whites owned slaves, and made african americans work long hours n heat for little money. The NAACP changed lives and helped african americans not be view certain way.

Some Social Darwinists believed that it was lawful and proper for all these injustices to occur because some nations had the right to command and control “lesser people”. Even some presidents of the time would not look into the issue and avoided talk about elevated levels of racism and nativism. Minorities and the inequality they saw everyday was extraordinarily jarring and still visible

Segregation was one of the key problems during most of the 1900s. Segregation is the enforced separation of different racial groups in a country, community, or establishment. Around the time when the the Civil War ended, slavery and segregation had been prohibited from the amendments of the U.S Constitution. Segregation was very wrong, because whites believed it was fair and equal. It was most definitely not.

Back in the 1930’s Jim Crow Laws were in play. Therefore it was not right for a white person to have anything to do with a black man such as defending a black man in court. But like I said many people think that odysseus has courage which he does but i think that Atticus has more courage because he represented a black man in court when that was not the right thing to do or the most popular thing to do at the time. He was also very

For Crooks, it was his whole life dealing with racial segregation and in his adulthood, he always had to be isolated from others. These life events shaped him into the person that he became angry and resentful. Today racial segregation is still an issue, many people have not yet accepted that the Civil Rights ended racial segregation. Justice Scalia is a perfect example, he is ignorant and believes that African-Americans should be put in slower passed schooling. Justice Scalia said, “There are those who contend that it does not benefit African-Americans to get them into the University of Texas, where they do not do well, as opposed to having them go to a less-advanced school, a slower track school where they do well.”

The American South took measures to make sure that African Americans still felt like the deferential society, by enforcing laws that separated blacks and whites. Many African Americans hated segregation, calling it unjust. On the other hand, some whites such as Woodrow Wilson, a former president of the United States of America felt it was necessary. He once said, “Segregation is not a humiliation but a benefit…”. The question of whether segregation was a necessity for American society or a hindrance, was the central focus of two society changing Supreme Court cases—Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of

Frederickson argues African Americans simply did not have the time or preparation to oppose racist forces. Using paramilitary forces, southern redeemers easily made threats to reconstruction forces as seen through the emergence of the violent Ku Klux Klan during the election of 1866. The opportunity for African Americans to gain a stance in society was short lived by the racist efforts of democrats in the south and impartial ideals from

For example, blacks couldn’t vote if their grandfather was a slave. They had to pass a really hard test to vote, and they were taxed when they voted. All of these laws tried to restrict the power of blacks. Not letting them vote means not letting them have free speech, which is their individual

Howard Zinn quotes the Oxford English Dictionary in order to explain how Blacks were seen just because of their skin color (31). There are many instances where African Americans fought against white supremacist ideologies on public transportation. For example, Robin D.G. Kelley explains several cases where passengers of color would refuse to give up his or her seat on public transportation or “moving theaters” (57). Another example from Kelley 's " In regards to these acts of resistance, most acts were “unorganized, clandestine, and evasive” which did not result in much positive treatment towards African Americans (Kelley 56). One challenge African Americans soon realized was that they were not progressing in their fight from oppression, so they decided to take a more organized approach which resulted in the creation of the Black Panther Party.

The Jim Crow law made it exceptionally hard for the African American community to gain Civil Rights. The law declared that in places of business, schools, churches, etc. it was acceptable to have the act of segregation. There was a group of people who were

When blacks in the North were freed, they were given the right to own property and pay taxes. However, according to the Voting and Jury Rights of Blacks in the North: 1860 chart, the were denied the right to serve on jury duty unless the black male was in Massachusetts after 1860 (Doc A). This example shows that even though slaves were free, the feeling of white superiority and power over blacks still remained. The whites felt that blacks could not represent the United States in court cases, so most states denied the right of jury duty to blacks.

Whites used literacy tests such as those similar to Alabama 's in order to keep as many blacks from registering to vote. Many of the blacks during this time weren’t well educated having the literacy tests with words that they could not understand gave the whites the upper hand. A large part that played into making literacy tests were because of fear. The Whites feared that if blacks were able to exercise their constitutional right to vote they would have the ability to change the government that the whites built. The blacks would be able to voice their own opinion and change laws and regulations such as those implemented for segregation.

Segregation led to whites and blacks not being able to marry. The state argued that they couldn 't take away the right to marry because of their race. The fact that Virginia only prohibited marriage between whites and blacks is proof that thus alone caused the discrimination. Finally, J. Stewart argued that this state law wasn 't valid, which causes the act of discrimination. Many Supreme Court cases have experienced this, and has had the biggest impact on Civil Rights and Equality: Dred Scott vs. Sanford, Plessy v. Ferguson, and Loving v. Virginia.