Critical race theory is an organized framework for the exact purpose of critical argument and racism theory that is based on the idea that race is not a characteristic of physically distinct groups, but instead a culturally defined category that is used to oppress minority groups. In “The Trials of Critical Race Theory”, this documentary shares the different points of view based on the citizens' personal beliefs and experiences about teaching race at school. Critical race theory critics are expressing their concerns regarding the systematic racism that is occurring in schools due to its implementation. The documentary is showing the different perspectives on how critical race theory should be taught in schools, whether race and …show more content…
Through interviews and reactions from Adam Yamaguchi, from the CBSN Originals, this documentary shares interviews from a varying number of teachers, students, and parents and ask their different points of view and how do they interpret the critical race theory. Activists and parents oppose the critical race theory and point out. Their claims on how schools teach their children “too young and too far” when teachers are teaching students the history of the United States and the effects of ethnicity and race in a minority’s daily lives (The Critical Race Theory, 5:21). Then, John adds on how the “critical race theory is wrong by implying that black people are in a permanently down condition or that it could change by some revolution in the way people think that deep we know is never going to happen” (The Critical Race Theory, 8:34). Although this may be true on the other hand, in an online critic meeting held by Moms for Liberty, an organization against the critical race theory, they are opposing the school district’s efforts to combat the critical race theory. They state that teachers are not trained for the job they are doing and that the critical race theory is causing a negative impact on racism in lessons. “Critical race theory isn’t so much about rooting out systemic racism is about dividing a culture” agreeing with the idea of not learning or talking about racism that parents even demanded and fired a teacher, Matthew Hawn. When Matthew was charged of dismissal he talks how in his class they discuss the daily news, how” students want to learn about this, they see the news, they saw what happened to George Floyd [and others citizens], so its not like they don’t know what the concept of racism is, people have an idea of what it means (The Trials of Critical Race Theory, 12:39). But the fact that got the
Using The Shifting Grounds of Race by Scott Kurashige focuses on the role of African Americans and Japanese Americans played in the social and political struggle that re-formed twentieth-century Los Angeles. By linking important historical events, such as Black Civil rights movement, NAACP, and Japanese Alien Land Law, internment camps, Kurashige also explains the classical black & white separation to then explore the multiethnic magnitudes of segregation and integration. Understanding how segregation, oppression, and racism shaped the area of Los Angeles became a shared interest between African American and Japanese Americans living together within diverse urban communities. Using this newly profound empowered a mental state that prepared
This connects to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 2 & 7 because it discriminates against people and also makes the law unfair to people of color. Critical Race Theory is a set of ideas holding racial bias in inherent parts of western society, especially in the social and legal institutions. This idea is strongly believed because white people designed and created social and legal institutions. " CRT (Critical Race Theory) challenges white privilege and exposes deficit-informed research that ignores, and often omits, the scholarship of people of color" (George 9). The idea of Critical Race Theory is a national issue throughout the United States.
Noliwe Rooks argues “Because of that discomfort and because we haven’t learned the skills necessary to engage in deep discussions on the topic, we avoid them at all costs. And when we look for excuses to close off those discussions, we allow misperceptions to spread”. Students are taught not to discuss race because they are taught not to see race when they interact with people; sadly, that is not the case. When people are not taught what racism is and what racism is not, then misunderstandings start to spread. If teachers properly taught students how to discuss race and racism in class, then students would know how to address it when they come across it.
They make decisions about where the direction the school is heading without consulting or collaborating with the existing families. Finally, the behavior of the white parents reflects a lack of awareness of their privilege and the ways in which it can be harmful. They assume that their desires and priorities should take precedence over those of the Black and Latino families, reflecting a lack willingness to listen and learn from
Patel immediately starts off speaking about non-white races in America and how many of them are stigmatized in a way that would portray them as terrorists. They do not appear like your stereotypical American and therefore must prove “[they] belong”. It’s worth noting that Patel herself is fair skinned and would appear like your stereotypical American despite her mixed heritage. While this may actually skew some of her opinion in the matter, Patel is also a lawyer who focuses on racial justice litigation, making her likely apt to continue. She hones in on the the Arab, Muslin, and Asian populations that are prescribed the negative label of terrorist, especially in our post-9/11 society.
CRT supporters use facts and evidence, such as statistics from the workplace and schools, to explain why CRT is needed in school systems today. CRT opposition believes that it can be harmful and divisive; the truth of CRT is that it is an essential tool for understanding and addressing systemic racism in American society. When reviewing the data regarding fundamental aspects of life such as education, healthcare, and employment, it is clear that people of color are severely worse off than white people. As unfortunate as it is, even an ethnic-sounding name, as opposed to a white-sounding name, can cause an employer to hire one over another. One of the sources I dove into was David Bell’s, “Who’s Afraid of Critical Race Theory”.
Critical Race Theory (CRT) is an interdisciplinary framework that emerged in the United States during the late 1970s and seeks to understand how race and racism intersect with other forms of social identity and power relations within society. Proponents of CRT posit that race is not biologically determined but is a social construct created to maintain power and privilege for dominant groups. One of the central tenets of CRT is the recognition that racism is not only an individual problem, but rather an institutionalized and systemic phenomenon that permeates society at all levels. CRT allows individuals to examine how the legal, social, and political systems perpetuate racial inequalities, leading to systemic racism and oppression. Despite its importance as an academic framework, CRT has recently come under attack from conservative pundits who use it as a talking point to promote their fascist ideology.
Ultimately, ethnic studies promote American ideals, create identity, and only create contempt when being constrained from these courses. Ethnic studies should be implemented in schools, because they promote American ideals of diversity, inclusion, and freedom. In a place like America, where diversity is supposed to be the building block of our nation, one would think that different ethnic groups would have the right to study their own identity. Students question this in the film and make claims such as, “Education is so against me that they don’t want me.” Evidently, with the threat of abolishing ethnic studies courses, students feel a lack of inclusion, which defies American values.
Sawchuk (2021), an associate editor who writes on curriculum states, “The theory says that racism is part of everyday life, so people—white or nonwhite—who don’t intend to be racist can nevertheless make choices that fuel racism. CRT puts an emphasis on outcomes, not merely on individuals’ own beliefs, and it calls on these outcomes to be examined and rectified” (para. 14). Teh existence of white privilege and systematic racism is not a matter of opinion; it is a clear and undeniable fact that has been showcased by lived experience and cannot be denied. The point of CRT is to expose the racial injustices within America’s system and to help amend these perceptions on people of
Critical race theory (or CRT) should not be taught to anyone from the grades of K-12. Many would have the citizens of America believing that the US is “systemically racist” and that we are, as a people, irredeemable in our ways, but that just isn’t true. The other side of this argument would like to tell every non-minority student that they are a part of the problem, but hardly seem to back up their claims with any factual evidence. Critical race theory, once called “critical theory”, was the Marxist doctrine that formed the basis of communism that would have even me, a white person, believe I’m a victim. Critical race theory is not the path towards a better and more equitable future, but really a means to a divided and hostile country that
There are five main theories we have discussed in class. The theories are social- conflict, structural-functional, symbolic interaction, gender-conflict, and race conflict. The Social-conflict theory emphasizes the role of conflict and power in society and that social inequality will inevitably occur because of differing interests and values between groups, particularly the competition for scarce resources. An example of social conflict is that private schools follow different teaching methods and provide better opportunities for the overall growth of the students than most public schools. Students who belong to a high socioeconomic background can easily afford to get admission to well-advanced schools.
The critical pedagogy movement aims to challenge the status quo of deculturalization by empowering the powerless and encompassing various viewpoints whilst pushing back on the dominant culture. Critical pedagogy has been becoming more prevalent throughout the educational system however in recent times has begun to spark political backlash and debate over the educational system in the United States. As the ideology of the old view of American oppressor and oppressed becomes challenged many citizens in the oppressor group find themselves vulnerable and have begun lashing out politically and socially. Although this fight has been going on for over one hundred years
In this book, author Tara J. Yosso demonstrates how institutional power and racism affect the Chicano/a educational pipeline by weaving together critical race theory and counterstories. Critical race theory is a framework used to discover the ways race as well as racism implicitly and explicitly shape social structures, practices, and discourses(Yosso, pg.4). Counterstories refer to any narrative that goes against majoritarian stories, in which only the experiences and views of those with racial and social privilege are told. The counterstory methodology humanizes the need to change our educational system and critical race theory provides a structure for Yosso to base her research. This results in a beautiful hybrid of empirical data, theory, and fascinating narratives that works to analyze how forms of subordination shape the Chicana/o pipeline, while also exposing how institutions, structures, and discourses of education maintain discrimination based on gender, race, class and their intersections.
Delgado and Stefancic (2011) stated that Critical Race Theory explores how “race, racism, and power intersect to create different circumstances for people of color within society [...] and in postsecondary institutions” (as cited in Quaye, 2013, p. 172). Within the field of higher education, it is important for student affairs professionals to recognize how race permeates all aspects of an individual’s life to fully understand their students’ experiences. Unlike other student development theories, such as Baxter-Magolda’s (2008) self-authorship and Abes, Jones, and McEwen’s (2007) Model of Multiple Identities, CRT places race at the “center of the analysis and assumes that race is omnipresent” in an individual’s life (Quaye, 2013, p. 167).
Race has always been a problem in America and other countries. But developments such as Critical Race Theory (CRT) has helped challenge race and racial power and its representation in American society. Articles such as Critical Race Theory: An Introduction by Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic; White Privilege, Color, and Crime: A Personal Account by Peggy McIntosh have helped CRT develop further. Along with the documentary White Like Me by filmmaker Tim Wise. These articles and film explore the race and racism in the United States, along with critical race theory.