Jose Molina
Class
Date
Ulysses S. Grant
Throughout history there was talk of great leaders, bloody battles, slavery, and much more. One individual that stands out, gets compared to, but also seems to be forgotten in centuries of so called “heroes” is Ulysses S. Grant. President Ulysses S. Grant rise to fame seems to be a great mystery to most giving no justice to his intellectual journey that was filled with many questions, doubts, stubbornness, achievements, failures, unfortunate detours, surprises, and insight. His personality was full of life and color. Many biographies of Ulysses S. Grant were written to describe his importance in history. Even though Ulysses S. Grant was given his rightful credit he seemed to be have always been compared
…show more content…
Although, both leaders did have many accomplishments and failures throughout their journey there should be no doubt. Ulysses S. Grant is and will always be the greatest leader, a national hero compared to Robert E. Lee.
Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee seems to have some similarities in their background, but also many differences in them as well. Ulysses S. Grant achieved greatness, but not without struggle. His life was not given to him easily. He overcame many obstacles including poverty, failure, and humiliation but with that also came riches, triumph, and glorification. Ulysses S. Grant developed both integrity and strong character in his boyhood years and at West Point Military Academy, that took him through the civil war, his years as president and throughout the rest of his life. (Smith, 13-19) Besides being a graduate of West Point he made his services known with a good record in the Mexican War. After the war, he withdrew from the military and began to work in his
…show more content…
Grant and Robert E. Lee had an astonishing similarity in their backgrounds, but going towards the civil war everything pointed to Robert E. Lee as the greatest general. Both General Grant and General Lee has attended West Point Military Academy. Robert E. Lee graduated at the top of his class while Ulysses S. Grant graduated regularly. Both General Grant and General Lee fought in the Mexican war although Ulysses S. Grant had a good record he did not seem to have a chance compared to Robert E. Lee who was given the reputation as a hero to many after. Robert E. Lee then became the head of West Point Military before the civil war came to play. Ulysses S. Grant at the beginning of the war was just a normal solider for the union until the end of the war when he became general. While Robert E. Lee had been the general for the confederate since the start and led his men throughout four years of bloody fight and many praises. No general could get in the way of General Lee and win; he was an unstoppable force to be reckon with. That was until General Grant with his stubbornness took the challenge. Although Ulysses S. Grant was not the most tackle general, in fact he had more of a mindset of going in there and fighting with no retreat, seemed to have benefited him the most in the end. He also never even looked like a general he was sloppy and dirty for the most part, but in the end, he was victorious. Robert E. Lee had always been one with strategies to take down his
I unequivocally believe that Union General, Ulysses S. Grant, was by far the more competent commander compared to General Robert E. Lee. Although the North had more manpower, industrial factories, and revenue, it is because of Grant’s leadership that the Union overall triumphed in the Civil War. Compared to General Robert E. Lee, “Grant adopted the strategy of annihilation” (Carrol 2007, 50). This approach would do him well in the future, because unlike the timid generals before him, “Grant was determined to defeat the confederate army” (Carrol 2007, 97). Therefore, after conquering Vicksburg, Mississippi, he ordered General Sherman and his soldiers to invade Georgia (Carrol 2007, 95).
Lee and Grant were both generals for their side. In the Spanish American war, they both served together and were
General Lee was far superior to Grant in almost every way. Ulysses S. Grant was an ignorant, egotistical fool that literally set his men up to die, shown in the battle of Cold Harbor. Grant knew he had more men and that's the only reason he was successful in most battles. Robert E. Lee was proclaimed the best general even before the Civil War had begun. Lee was known from the Mexican American war and only finalized that he was the best general in America through key points in the Civil War.
Ulysses S. Grant made many major contributions to the nation as a military strategist, a Civil War hero, supporting the rights of African Americans and serving as the 18th President. Grant attended military school and used his military strategies to help win the Civil War and contribute to ending slavery in the United States. As president, he supported the rights of African Americans, he passed acts to protect the freed slaves from being enslaved again, he allowed all citizens to vote in the 15th Amendment, and he guaranteed equal treatment of African Americans in public places. As the 18th president of the United States, he worked to increase trade between the United States and other countries and improve the nation’s relationships with countries
General Ulysses S. Grant had a great impact on the United States both in his time as a war general and in his time as president. His role in the Civil War was instrumental to the Union victory and the strategies he employed saved many union troops and ended the war quickly. He had many wins, but also many losses and setbacks that were devastating. He learned and adapted through those setbacks and won the war and the American public. The United States would have had a much harder time winning the war and with recovery efforts afterward were it not for General Grant.
When looking back onto the great history of American leaders and generals, many names notably stand out. These American heroes helped to shape the future of our country, from the efforts of General Dwight D. Eisenhower in the Second World War, to General Douglas Macarthur of the Korean War, to even George Washington in the Revolutionary War. Regardless, each of these brave leaders allowed for their respective forces to attain victory, yet in this caveat, the legacy of many brilliant and skillful generals is lost. Victory does not determine skill, and such a notion has never attested to a military leader as much as it applies to General Robert E. Lee, of the Confederate Forces in the American Civil War. Lee’s proficiency in battle tactics and
In “Nathan Bedford Forrest; A Biography” by Jack Hurst, there are many occurrences of literary and historical contrast. One main occurrences are the contrast of the North and South's’ beliefs of slavery. The other is the contrast of General Nathan Bedford Forrest and General William Tecumseh Sherman and how they chose to fight the war. To begin, a major contrast is obviously the beliefs of both the North and the South. In the biography, the ideas and actions of both sides is equally shown.
Ulysses S. Grant was born in Point Pleasant, Ohio in April of 1822. He graduated from West Point in 1843. He was found to be an effective soldier/leader during the Mexican War, however, once the excitement of battle was over he was no longer interested in the mundane tasks of the everyday soldier. General Grant developed a very heavy drinking habit and resigned his commission in 1854. Once the Civil War began he enlisted in the Union Army and was promoted to brigadier general.
Despite the achievements and failures of Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee both wanted the same thing, to preserve the Union. The problem is that Lee was a sectionalist, although he wanted to preserve the Union, it was state before country for him. Both generals attended West Point Military Academy. Grant was not as studious as Lee, who graduated second in his class out of thirty nine. Whereas, Grant graduated in the twenty first spot in his class of thirty nine.
Grant is a five. He had good intentions and grand goals, but accomplished very few of them. Many of his cabinet members were incompetent and corrupt, doing nothing more than tarnishing his reputation. His inaction left an economically ruined America. As the last Reconstruction president, he tried to finish what Presidents Lincoln and Johnson started.
Grant In The Civil War Ulysses S. Grant was the eighteenth president and left his mark as a great general in the Civil War. Grant quotes, “There are but two parties not, traitors and patriots, and I want hereafter to be ranked with the latter” (Houghton 16). Fearlessly leading his troops through unknown terrain, Grant strived for unity and freedom (Stickney). Grant was among many important people fighting in the Civil War and played a key role as a Northern general, such as training troops and fighting, successfully, against strong Southern leaders like Robert E. Lee. As a general, Ulysses S. Grant showed loyalty in the Civil War by, fighting in many battles, leading and training troops to fight, and becoming one of America’s greatest leaders
Comparison and Contrast Analysis “A Study in Contrasts” In his essay “A Study in Contrasts,” Bruce Catton effectively delineates the extreme contrasts between Civil War generals Ulysses S. Grand and Robert E. Lee, but also describes their surprising similarities. Cattons’s purpose in employing comparison and contrast in his essay is to describe the differences in the two Civil War generals from the North and the South and how their colossal differences reflect the sectional tensions that lead to the war, but also how they have remarkably similar fighting qualities that help pave to road to peace after war. For instance, he corroborates that Lee was an aristocrat that valued tradition and culture. Catton states that Lee believed that men were
It was described that Lee felt as if “losing men was like losing his own children, it brought tears to his eyes” (Marrin 108). Moreover, General Lee experienced success as a result of his relational leadership style in that is his men “regarded him as a higher form of humanity” (Marrin 109) and “what they did, they did for him” (Marrin 109) in their war efforts. Robert E. Lee, a born leader, shined in commanding an army of men with whom he served
General Ulysses S. Grant was a very powerful man. He was the son of a tanner on the Western frontier. He wasn’t born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He was very modern, and thought you had to work hard no matter what. Grant was a man that did not live in the past.
History has been marked with a wide variety of influential leaders. Commonly revered leaders were considered influential by standards of heroism, presence, public opinion or positions of stature. Overall most leaders have some of the same qualities in common, despite what they became to be known for. To be truly influential, a leader had to set themselves apart during times of strife and no matter the setting or time they lived in, their actions would be remembered for years to come.