Danyck Belanger ELA (B30) Ms. Obrigewitsch May 3, 2023 The Noble Brutus: Examining the characters virtues and flaws Brutus is known as a noble man and an honorable through sarcasm sometimes, but none the less even through history and time he is seen by a noble man. Brutus is said by many to be an honorable, but why is he labeled as a noble and honorable man after killing the most liked figured in Rome Julius Caesar. This topic was very interesting because it is the thought on how the man that helped killed Julius Caesar how virtually did not do anything was then killed because people thought if he was king, he would burn Rome to the ground. In the play Julius Caesar Shakespeare made Brutus a important person who moved the plot forward and …show more content…
This was the betrayal that Caesar felt he was not this was important because how it sets Brutus character and Caesar Brutus for going through and Caesar for being stubborn and not seeing the dangers even though the signs were in front of him. Without Brutus thing would be different a lot would change withing the play without Brutus he might have been killed himself alongside Julius Caesar and his decisions were important. The important of what he did helped moved the plot forward him not killing Mark Antony because Brutus said in act 2 scene 1 “our course will seem too bloody” (Line 163) this stated by Brutus is saying that if they killed Mark Antony, it would be to bloody it would be too much, they are only going to kill Caesar. This pushed the plot because him not killing Antony allowed him to talk at the funeral and swaying the public opinion that made the conspirators flee Rome out of fear. A different action could have possibly changed the outcome where maybe Brutus was then elected as the leader of
Mostly, Brutus being part of the conspiracy means that it will be easier to carry out the act, and convince the people of Rome that it was the best option and that it means they can start again and do better this
Brutus was an honorable, kind, and noble friend to Julius Caesar. But Brutus was also part of Caesar’s death. Brutus was a man of Rome and was loved by everyone in Rome. Everything he did was for the good of Rome. But due to his lower intellect, he fell for Cassius' sinister plan to kill Caesar.
The least honorable character of Julius Caesar is Decius because he lies to people oftentimes. According to the text, Decius tells Caesar that his wife’s nightmares mean nothing at all and that Caesar should still show up to the Senate. This is very unhonorable, as one should always tell the truth. Based on the text, Decius is the type to lie often. The evidence is showing that the more honorable characters never lie as much as Decius.
Have you ever been so caught up in yourself that you miss things that could have been useful later or saved you from a difficult situation? Well, this is an issue for the main character, Julius Caesar, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. In this play, Rome just won a war followed by a celebration, and this upsets Brutus and Cassius. Cassius makes a plan to kill Caesar and has a group with Brutus called the conspirators. There are different omens that say, Caesar will die, and these omens come true leading to Caesar's death.
Brutus William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar depicts Brutus' internal struggles, his assassination of Caesar with the other conspirators, and their subsequent downfall. In the final scene, Mark Antony describes Brutus as "the noblest Roman of them all", for he was the only conspirator who acted for the good of Rome.
The least honorable character of Julius Caesar is Brutus. The main reason Brutus is dishonorable is because he betrayed his friend Caesar. Brutus shouldn’t have made Caesar think they were friends because in the end they weren’t true friends. If Brutus wanted to be seen as an honorable friend he should have sat down and talked to him about what he was doing. Instead of doing this, Brutus killed Caesar and helped the conspirators.
At this point in the play, Brutus was making all of the decisions for the conspirators. He would not listen to Cassius when he should have. For example, if they would have killed Antony he would not have had to flee Rome, another thing he should have listened to is that Brutus should not have let Antony make a speech in act 3 scene 2 lines 73-105. Antony was able to use pathos during his speech to turn the people against the conspirators, while Brutus tried using logos. If Brutus would have used a different approach he would not have had the people turn against
Sidney Woodard McGlaughlin Honors English 2 Period 3 27 January 2023 TITLE In William Shakespeare’s play, The tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus’ soliloquy in Act 2 Scene One examines the contemplation and difficult decision that he must make in order to protect Rome from Julius Caesar. Brutus, alongside Cassius, formed to join the conspirators, a group of senators who are working together to assassinate Caesar, a Roman general who ruled himself as dictator over Rome. Therefore, Brutus and the conspirators believe that they must kill Julius Caesar because of his ambition to be crowned, which would lead to mass destruction and ruin Rome. Through Brutus’ soliloquy, Shakespeare uses imagery, tone, and figurative language to demonstrate the relationship
Near the beginning of act II, Brutus has a soliloquy in which he is trying to decide whether joining the conspiracy is the right thing to do. He discusses reasons for why killing Caesar may be appropriate for the current situation of him being crowned king. Brutus also reveals his thoughts about some of Caesar’s behavior and what could happen (based on human nature) if he is given power. In the end, he decides to join with the conspiracy and kill Caesar.
Julius was loved by so many people that his death had caused a civil war. However, by making himself dictator made a lot of people angry, for example the group of people that had assassinated Julius. “The conspiracy failed to achieve its desired goal, and rather than restoring the republic, the assassination of Caesar triggered a civil war.” It shows that Brutus really wanted to be apart of the assassination because he had wanted Rome to be restored, but instead of making things better, all he did was start a civil war that essentially was made a very significant constitutional transformation throughout Rome. Brutus and Caesar had made Caesar trust him and believe that he could be his friend but he had proved him wrong in the actions he took by siding with Cassius and betraying Caesar once again.
However, Brutus was able to outlive all the other conspirators and will be thought of as the noblest man. Antony and a few other Romans discover Brutus’s body. Antony says to the Romans that he was the “noblest Roman of them all” (5.5.74). Even after he died, he was remembered by all the Romans as an honorable man, despite what he helped do to Caesar. Brutus was the center of the plot and helped navigate the play from beginning to end.
Shakespeare tries to convey the idea of how respected and good-hearted Brutus is. These are ideals that are carried by Heroes not villains, therefore Shakespeare was trying to show that Mark Antony was a
Julius Caesar In the beginning it was all easy a new leader in in town an everything was fine. That is until the leader was killed by nobles. Brutus was a noble that was very honorable but also very gullible. Brutus’s best friend was the exact opposite of Brutus, which makes Brutus a tragedy hero.
Shakespeare acknowledges Brutus’ character as a noble man. When Caesar is offered a crown by Antony, Brutus becomes conflicted in such a way that he isolates himself
Without Brutus the conspirators would have never lasted as long as they did after killing Caesar. They would have been portrayed as murders for butchering and killing two people if Brutus did not speak. “For Antony is but a limb of Caesar/ Let us be sacrificers, but not butchers, Caius”(JC II.i.167-168). Brutus does not envy Caesar like other conspirators.