The importance of this war and need to reestablish the Union caused Grant to take new strategies when waging war. In this war Grant used tactics such as year long warfare, high tempo warfare and siege warfare to destroy the confederates. By doing this he not only secured many major Union victories, but also changed how wars would be fought for years to come. And furthermore, through these new strategies of war we can can see how Grant not only affected the outcome of the war and war itself, but also the people within the war both confederate and federal. Prior to this war, wars had only been waged seasonally so that men could operate their farms or not have to deal with the intense winters. But Grant completely ignored this and decided to fight year round forcing southern men to fight as …show more content…
In this type of warfare a city, fort or town is surrounded due to its defensive position. While neither side aggressively fought there is a constant ongoing the battle for survival. The end of this warfare occurred by one group starving or running out of supplies and either surrendering or dying out. This use of passive aggressive warfare allowed Grant to take a large group of southern troops without facing enormous losses on his side, and in turn saving union soldiers lives. An example of this would be the Battle or Siege of Vicksburg, in which Grant surrounded the city and forced Pemberton to surrender after 47 days of siege warfare. The affects of this specific example on the confederates were devastating with 29,491 officers and men being surrendered to the Union, but more importantly it resulted in the union gaining control of the Mississippi River. As Lincoln said, “Vicksburg is the key. The war can never be brought to a close until the key is in our pocket.” This shows how this use of warfare directly correlated to the result of the war, and therefore how Grants use of siege tactics caused the Union to
Gauge Zidlick Mollie Swayne English 102 12 February 2018 How Technology Advancements Effected the Civil War The Civil War brought about many different advancements in a variety of areas during the time period. Everything from battlefield communication to weapon technology received an upgrade, allowing both the North and the South to become more effective fighters on the battlefield. New weapon technology allowed soldiers to engage each other in ways never thought of in previous wars.
In the battle of shiloh Grant was able to fight off the confederate soldiers and hold them off while getting reinforcements and eventually being able to win the battle. On the first day of “Bloody Shiloh,” Grant saved his army, and on the second day he counterattacked and drove the enemy forces from the battlefield and back toward Corinth. General Grant Despite its disastrous start, Shiloh was a major victory for Grant. Grant led his army from the front and would stick to his plan of attack, and was able to adapt to the attacks of the Confederates.
The American Civil War proved that prolongated 19th Century wars would replace pre-1809 Napoleonic-era rapid decisive wars. The victors of 19th Century warfare were militaries that successfully exhausted their opponent and broke their opponent’s will to fight. The North’s
General Ulysses S. Grant had a great impact on the United States both in his time as a war general and in his time as president. His role in the Civil War was instrumental to the Union victory and the strategies he employed saved many union troops and ended the war quickly. He had many wins, but also many losses and setbacks that were devastating. He learned and adapted through those setbacks and won the war and the American public. The United States would have had a much harder time winning the war and with recovery efforts afterward were it not for General Grant.
They also increase the number of guard’s station on the railroads and food stock. Soon, the Union commanders would also create special counter guerrilla cavalry units. However, this does cause a few problems for Grant, who was in charge in Virginia. Some of the lost in conventional battles were due to large portions of Union’s solider pursing partisans and Sothern aggressors. This also does not lower the outrage of the soldiers against the acts against the guerrillas.
Andy Poon AP United States History Mrs. McBride September 6, 2016 Ulysses S Grant was an iconic figure in the Civil War and was well known for his astounding feats throughout the war. However, while he may have been a prodigious general who won the Civil War for the Union, Grant was a substandard president. He won the Election of 1868 by a landslide after the highly unpopular Andrew Johnson’s retirement, and served two terms before retiring absolutely broke. As a president of both the historical Reconstruction Era and the Gilded Age, Grant was in a difficult position.
The election of President Lincoln had a huge affect on the civil war. Lincoln made numerous attempts to free slaves and to end the civil war. All of his attempts had helped in ways to end the civil war. His attempts included of the 13th amendment, the Emancipation Proclamation, his hard work on keeping the United States as one, and etc. Also because of the election of president Lincoln the 14th and 15th amendment was later on made as one of the Civil War Amendments.
Grant led his legacy not only through his battles, but through his childhood. When Grant was just a child, he was never thought to have even pass his classes but he ended up becoming the lieutenant (A&E Television Network). This shows his legacy because he was thought of so lowly and then he became the lieutenant in the American Civil War. He kept pushing through and he was one of the main leaders in the American Civil War. In addition he was one of the first lieutenants since George Washington.
Grant was elected for president in 1869 and again in 1873. Grant began the civil war training new recruits and was promoted to the rank of colonel on June 1861. Major General John C. Frémont acclaimed to Grant’s “iron will to win” and promoted him to Commander of the
In order to change history so that the Confederacy wins the Civil War, I would kill two influential people to the Union cause: Joshua L. Chamberlain and Ulysses S. Grant. I would make sure that Chamberlain was killed during in combat on Little Round Top during Gettysburg before he called for the swinging gate maneuver. If Chamberlain was unable to initiate the swinging gate maneuver that led to a Confederate defeat on Little Round Top, then the Confederates would have eventually overtaken the outgunned Union troops. By securing Little Round Top, The Confederates would have the perfect vantage point to attack and fire on the Union army, and such casualties could have led to a Confederate victory at Gettysburg.
Lincoln needed someone to take control, for he could not run the war on his own. He then placed General Grant in charge of all union forces in the spring of 1864. General Grant's had a different approach, which was a strategy called "Hard War" (Hewitt, 435). This strategy was in which soldiers not only attacked military targets but also destroyed civilian crops, livestock, fields, and property of the supply chains. Soldiers were indeed bothered by his strategy however, Lincoln putting him in charge made a huge difference in the war between the Union and the
This was the culmination of one of the most brilliant military campaigns of the war. With the loss of Pemberton’s army and this vital stronghold on the Mississippi, the Confederacy was effectively split in half. Grant's successes in the West boosted his reputation, leading ultimately to his appointment as General-in-Chief of the Union armies. It is one of the more remarkable campaigns of the American Civil War. For many a hard fought month, Ulysses S. Grant and his Army of the Tennessee had been trying to wrest away the strategic Confederate river fortress of Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Grant was appointed commander of all Union forces by President Abraham Lincoln in March 1864. He was known for his aggressive tactics and was eager to end the war quickly. Grant once stated, “The art of war is simple enough. Find out where your enemy is. Get at him as soon as you can.
Union claims victory! The march that had started on November 15th, has ended. Union Gen. William T. Sherman claims the city of Savannah, on December 21st. Many Georgian hearts are broken again, after their recent defeat in Atlanta. This march has caused major damage to the Confederate economy, transportation system, and their will to win.
To a greater extent, slavery was the greatest cause of the outbreak of the civil war in 1860. Disputes of slavery caused economic and political troubles between the northern and southern states leading up to the civil war. The fact the the northern and southern states were different in almost every way caused them to turn out like completely different territories, one of their greatest differences was the fact that most southern states economy relied on hard labour, agricultural jobs like tobacco in Maryland, and cotton in Virginia; this caused their economy to be more based on the labour of slaves than the more developed territories in the north (Harrold), who after this time was starting to not need the slave labour in their territories because after early 1800’s, the industrial revolution had been spreading to America, and the country developed very quickly. But in this expansion, only the north states were getting the effect of the industrial revolution, meaning the north would not need slave