ipl-logo

What Was The Impact Of Slavery On Politics Between 1840 And 1860

483 Words2 Pages

Slavery was the dominating reality of all Southern life, especially aspects of life relating to the economy and politics. From the years 1840 to 1860 slavery had a great impact on economics and politics because it played such a critical role. Slaveholders only included a very small amount of the population in the South. About one-fourth of the population in the South owned slaves. Yet, there was an undeniable impact of slavery on the economy of the South. In the 1840’s and 1850’s the South had become mostly a cash crop agricultural economy. Without slaves, people were only able to keep small farms that barely made enough money. Crops like cotton were produced in the South and were in high demand. The increase in demand for these products …show more content…

The South wanted to add more slave states that would upset the balance of the Missouri Compromise. Previously, there was a balance between equal number of slave states and free states. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slave states north of the latitude 36’30’. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed on May 30, 1854 and was created to repeal the Missouri Act. This act allowed territories to decide if they wanted to be a free or slave state based on popular sovereignty. Kansas entering the union as a slave state would upset the balance the Missouri Compromise had set. This act was a temporary fix to a problem that would exist for years to come. This act proves that slavery dominated political life of the South. The Compromise of 1850 was a series of five bills passed by Congress regarding confrontation about free and slave states over territories acquired by America after the Mexican-American war. The compromise created stronger fugitive slave laws. In the Dred Scott decision Supreme Court Justice Robert Taney declared slaves as property. In 1857, Taney declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and it should not be illegal to have slaves anywhere. He believed slaves were property therefore, Dred Scott had no right to sue his master for taking him to a free state. This infuriated many abolitionists Political issues of the South centered on slavery. The South fought every chance they could to keep their

Show More
Related

The Missouri Compromise: The Fire Of War

139 Words | 1 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was definite attempt by the government to shove the issue out of view. By the time the Missouri Compromise was introduced, a few northern states were already in the process of abolishing slavery, as was England. The government was finally recognizing the cruelties of slavery but did not want to anger the southern plantation owners. Thus, they created the Missouri Compromise in order to ease their guilt and face the least contempt. The Missouri Compromise was only able to increase the brewing conflict of slavery between northern states and southern states.

Read More

Osage Tribe Would Have Never Been In Favor Of The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act

532 Words | 3 Pages

The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act was an act, which allowed new territories to decide if they were a free or slave state by popular sovereignty (Civilwar.org, Kansas-Nebraska Act). Kansas-Nebraska Act negated the Missouri Compromise. Missouri Compromise was an effort by the congress to diffuse the political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri in 1819 for admission as a state in which supported slavery (Garraty and Foner). This was done to restore the balance of slave and free states at the time. Kansas-Nebraska Act violated the compromise that was made in the Missouri Compromise, it reignited the disagreement between the anti and pro-slavery factions, which lead to violent events.

Read More

Compromise Of 1850 Dbq Essay

1309 Words | 6 Pages

Before the passing of the Compromise of 1850, Congress needed to keep the power balanced between slave states and non-slave states in the government. To keep the balance, they passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. This Compromise allowed Missouri into the union as a slave state and allowed Maine into the union as a non-slave state. As a result, the balance between slave states and non-slave states stayed equal. This resulted in neither the North nor the South having an advantage in passing laws.

Read More

Why Was The Kansas Nebraska Act Important To American History

881 Words | 4 Pages

”There are only two sides to this question. Every man must be for the United States or against it. There can be no neutrals in this war; only patriots and traitors” once said by Stephen Douglas of Illinois. He was a man known for creating an act that could be the most significant thing leading up to the civil war. He wrote The Kansas-Nebraska Act which let the people of the territory vote for or against slavery.

Read More

How Did Henry Clay Came Up With A Compromise

604 Words | 3 Pages

It forced them to travel all the way to Canada instead of closer free states to find freedom. Even though it was part of a compromise between the North and the South act favored the South. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise was created to help resolve the debate over the border of slave and free state. It only lasted for about thirty years before the South and North started to debate over what was a free state and slave state over the new territory on the West Coast.

Read More

How Did The Government Policies Affect The Economy Of The United States

774 Words | 4 Pages

The economy in the United States was very different throughout the regions of the United States between 1800 to 1848. Government policies and laws about slavery, taxes, and transportation greatly affected the economies in the North, the South, and the West in different ways and led to different results. Government policies concerning slavery affected the regions of the United States differently. In the begining January 1808, the previously voted issue of the international slave trade was banned throughout the United States and this agreement altered the South the most because the South had previously been importing slaves from countries in Africa. The ban on the slave trade their South their economy by limiting the amount of slaves

Read More

Mexican-American War Dbq

1208 Words | 5 Pages

In 1820, the Missouri Compromise was passed by legislation. The compromise stated that Missouri would become an official state in America, and would come in as a slave state. To balance this, Maine was admitted as a free state. The more long term effect this compromise created was the introduction of the 36-30 line. The line essentially divided the states into north and south, and those in the North would not be permitted slavery while those in the South were.

Read More

Impact Of The Missouri Compromise

969 Words | 4 Pages

Being “the first great Congressional compromise over the slavery issue” , the Compromise was very important because it set a precedent that Congress can dictate and regulate slavery in new territories entering the Union. This might not have seemed like a very big issue at the time, but a few decades later this became a very hot topic for debate. The Missouri Compromise was always a solution that just postponed the Civil War, the war was inevitable. Without everyone being in agreement over the issue of slavery, there would always be tensions between states. The Missouri Compromise was abolished in 1854 when the Kansas-Nebraska Act was introduced.

Read More

Summary Of Water From The Rock

1906 Words | 8 Pages

Report of Sylvia Frey’s Water From the Rock: Black Resistance in a Revolutionary Age Sylvia Frey’s Water from the Rock is meant to convey the deeper meaning of the American Revolution and the determination, line of events and the opportunity for black resistance in America. Frey lays the book out by discussing the economical and geographical differences in America and the effects of this on racial segregation. The pre-Revolution south in America had a highly successful economical basis in slavery.

Read More

The Expansion Of Slavery And The Civil War

94 Words | 1 Pages

The end result of the Dred Scott decision was Chief Justice Roger Taney 's decision that Congress did not possess the jurisdiction to stop slavery from spreading into other territories, even if they were considered free. Even worse, any free Black could now be allowably forced into slavery. Being forced into slavery was also seen as being beneficial to the free Blacks. Instead of reaching a decision as President Buchanan had hoped, it had started a rapid expansion of the conflict. This rapid expansion over the issue of slavery eventually led to the Civil War.

Read More

What Was The Impact Of Slavery On The Old South

766 Words | 4 Pages

No matter your stance at the time, one thing became clear: socially, politically and economically, slavery was the fabric of American success and gave birth to the Old South as we know it today. At the center of the entire institution of slavery, and central to its defense, was the economic domination it provided a young country in international markets. In the early 19th century, cotton was a popular commodity and overtook sugar as the main crop produced by slave labor. The production of cotton became the nation’s top priority; America supplied ¾ of the cotton supply to the entire world.

Read More

The Secessionist Movement

556 Words | 3 Pages

Southern Slave States feared an increase in Free States in the North, so with the implementation of the Missouri Compromise, they felt slightly more secure in their position in the Union. Henry Clay’s compromise forbade slavery north of the 36th parallel, which added security to the North as well, yet it was eventually deemed unconstitutional in the Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sandford. It was replaced by the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act with the execution of a policy known as popular sovereignty, which essentially allows the citizens of an area to determine whether they would allow slavery in that specific area. Nevertheless, neither the Missouri Compromise nor the Kansas-Nebraska Act impacted the South’s decision to secede like the Compromise of 1850. Though it was meant to benefit the South through strengthening the Fugitive Slave Act,

Read More

Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

1121 Words | 5 Pages

There were many important Compromises between the years of 1820 and 1860, some that worked completely and some that didn’t. In the early nineteenth century, people were good at compromising and making things work for everyone. How long did perfect compromising actually last? Slavery began to split the nation apart, causing compromising to become hard to do.

Read More

Why Did The South Grow Essay

828 Words | 4 Pages

“The South grew, but it did not develop,” is the way one historian described the South during the beginning of the nineteenth century because it failed to move from an agrarian to an industrial economy. This was primarily due to the fact that the South’s agricultural economy was skyrocketing, which caused little incentive for ambitious capitalists to look elsewhere for profit. Slavery played a major role in the prosperity of the South’s economy, as well as impacting it politically and socially. However, despite the common assumption that the majority of whites in the South were slave owners, in actuality only a small minority of southern whites did in fact own slaves. With a population of just above 8 million, the number of slaveholders was only 383,637.

Read More

How Did Slavery Change Between 1800 And 1860

522 Words | 3 Pages

Between 1800 and 1860 two major things changed within the country. The cash crops changed from tobacco and rice to the new money maker cotton. Along with the crops changing the slave trade grew to replace the economic short fall in the Chesapeake area. These changed occurred due to the supply and demand of commonly bought goods. Another contributing factor for the crops changing was the invention of the cotton gin in 1793 and the use of cotton in textile facilities.

Read More

More about What Was The Impact Of Slavery On Politics Between 1840 And 1860

Open Document