I’m somewhere in the middle of this whole situation. I would say some did deserve their deaths, and some did not. I’m somewhat conflicted with some characters, such as Emily Brent who did throw Beatrice Taylor out of her home, but did not know she would later take her life because of it. I’m going to focus more on the straightforward characters. Here are some examples of characters who I think should not have died. Anthony Marston: He was “guilty of the murder of John and Lucy Combes”. He explains that he was speeding and accidently ran over two kids. What he did was an accident, and was in no way intentional. He didn’t plan on killing those kids. Sure, you could argue that it was somewhat his fault for being a reckless driver, but I still …show more content…
He abandoned them, and took all of their supplies. He admit to killing them, and claimed it was all to save himself. He felt no remorse for killing these men, saying it was okay because they were just natives. This was done deliberately, but it is a different case. Instead of abandoning them and taking their supplies to kill them, he just did it to benefit himself. Either way, they would’ve died, and he would’ve deserved his death. General MacArthur: He “deliberately sent his wife’s lover, Arthur Richmond, to his death.” Here is another case where the person didn’t kill someone themselves, but caused their death intentionally. He sent Richmond because he knew that anyone who went would be killed, and therefore technically commit murder. If he believes Richmond should have died for doing something to him, then he deserves his death because he did something to someone else as well. I could go on for pages about who did and did not deserve to die and who I could not decide on. I think if the character deserved death, Justice Wargrave’s idea of having a murder-mystery gimmick is pretty smart. I think it is smart because making them feel that they were going to die soon and making them experience death makes them go through what they made others go
By saying the individual on trial shall not live because they murdered another, this reflects back on the decision makers. It deems those making the decisions hypocrites. The court members are choosing whether one lives or dies, and if they choose the death option they are performing the exact crime the individual could be on trial for. Murder. The court’s final
There had been no physical evidence to link Jason Baldwin, Damien Echols, and Jessie Misskelley with the crime. However, they were convicted after Jessie Misskelley was questioned and had then went on to admit to supposedly committing
While he claims that he's trying to help Natives against discrimination. It's obvious he was trying to use that as a cover up so he could have the land because the Supreme Court declined
1985 he dies in prison. July 1997 the FBI reopens finding new evidence. Thomas Blanton and Bobby Frank Cherry are indicted by a grand jury in Alabama. Both with 8 count each of first-degree murder, 4 counts of intentional Murder, and 4 counts of murder with universal malice. May 1, 2001 Thomas Blanton is convicted of first-degree murder and is sentence with life in prison.
Governor Danforth seems to be afraid of the consequences brought on by his beliefs and actions, so he killed everyone to make himself appear powerful in the court. By killing everyone who appeared in court, he believe others would trust in him and believe he was doing the his job well, even when he was not. He should be hung for killing the
Romeos and Juliets Death Romeo and Juliet is a tragic play about two love-struck teens that eventually falls in love. They have to face obstacles just to find a way to be together and eventually have to secrednize their marriage. The characters Friar Lawrence, Romeo and Lord, Lady Capulet are primarily responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. They all have things they did that leads to Romeo and Juliet’s departness. Also, the decisions they made and the problems they caused such as ruining true love.
I’m going to be talking about three reasons they should get the death penalty, which are: They killed the family to get money, how brutal the murder was, and how they made people feel bad for them after the murder. Perry and Dick went into the Clutter’s house one night to get their money. Someone told them there was $10,000 in the house when there really wasn’t. They started tearing the whole house up, they were taking up the floors, tearing down the walls, asking them where the money was.
The Port Arthur Massacre occurred on the 28th and 29th of April 1996 in Port Arthur, Tasmania, Australia. Martin Bryant is undoubtedly guilty for the murder of 35 people along with 20 people injured as he had the motive due to being socially inappropriate, mentally disabled, and infused with a high level of frustration and anger towards others. Similarly, witnesses report seeing him at the scene of the crime and time frames noted by those who saw him, place him at Port Arthur on the day this event took place. Further to this, though he initially denied having anything to do with it, he later confessed at the court hearing, and admitted his guilt. Martin Bryant is undoubtedly guilty for the murder of 35 people along with 20 people injured as he had the motive due to being socially inappropriate, mentally disabled, and infused with a high level of frustration and anger
Accessory Manslaughter Jack Merridew, the defendant, is accused of being responsible for brutality that played out on an island and for the death of two young boys. In Illinois, anyone who assists another in the killing of someone can be convicted for Accessory Manslaughter. Looking at what Merridew took part in on the island, he may be guilty of this crime. To begin with, there is a precise definition of the law. Accessory Manslaughter is “knowingly assisting or helping someone commit a crime.”
Should people in life or death situations be held accountable? Yes and no, it is and isn’t that person 's fault it’s they could have thought about it and realized that he could get hurt and die or live it’s like mountain climbing it’s like what if you fall off and hit your head.it depends on how you think of it, wheather you want to doecause its dangerous or you may not know if it is dangerous yet you do it anyway. Likewise it can be where you get hurt and will be held accountable even though you know that you can get hurt and die.
He wanted to have the treaty signed , but they didn’t sign. This is what forced the removal of the indians. He was forced to have officers to make sure it was enforced and the officers were not enemies as the indians thought they were. The indians brought it upon themselves by not signing the treaty that soldiers were sent in to enforce that it be
How does one live a life as a Christian that honors and glorifies God? The answer is by reflecting Christ’s image by acting as He would in every situation. Because of what Jesus has done for sinners on the cross, they desire to live by His example in order to give Him glory. However, living a Christ-like life can only happen through the work of the Holy Spirit, who comes in to sinner’s hearts when they first put their trust in Jesus and the cross, growing them and making them more like Jesus. Many characters in books, stories, and movies have Christ-like qualities and characteristics, an example of this being Harper Lee’s masterpiece.
Throughout the Elizabethan the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet there have been key people responsible for the death of two lovers. In Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, Nurse and Lord Capulet should be punished while Benvolio should be pardoned for the death of two lovers. In William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet Nurse and Lord Capulet should be punished while Benvolio should be pardoned.
Killing another seems very unjustifiable, which might be the case but when someone takes another 's life and sent to prison, death row or capital punishment is needed to put that person were they belong. People like that deserve to die because of their mistake of killing another and it deters other people to not kill others, showing them what would happen. In the case of Capital Punishment, Hunting for Sport, or George and Lennie, killing is a justifiable act. In the case of capital punishment killing is justified and needs to be done. For example, “Some crimes are so inherently evil they demand strict penalties up to and including death”(McClatchy).
Though the natives were peaceful people, he still killed off a large portion of their population, as well as entire tribes. Also, an even bigger portion of their population were forced to leave, some leaving behind their family. Andrew Jackson 's need for power turned him into a savage who doesn’t care about the well-being of those he comes